Stimulus–Response Compatibility for Vertically Oriented Stimuli and Horizontally Oriented Responses: Evidence for Spatial Coding

References

• Anzola , G. P. , Bertolini , G. , Buchtel , H. A. and Rizzolatti , G. 1977 . Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction times . Neuropsychologica , 15 : 295 – 302 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer , D. W. and Miller , J. 1982 . Stimulus–response compatibility and the motor system . Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 34A : 367 – 380 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brebner , J. 1973 . S–R compatibility and changes in RT with practice . Acta Psychologica , 37 : 93 – 106 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase , W. G. and Clark , H. H. 1971 . Semantics in the perception of verticality . British Journal of Psychology , 63 : 311 – 326 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta , A. and Proctor , R. W. 1992 . Persistence of stimulus–response compatibility effects with extended practice . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 18 : 801 – 809 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenstein , W. H. , Schroeder-Heister , P. and Heister , G. 1989 . Spatial S–R compatibility with orthogonal stimulus–response relationship . Perception & Psychophysics , 45 : 215 – 220 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts , P. M. and Seeger , C. M. 1953 . S–R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes . Journal of Experimental Psychology , 46 : 199 – 210 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heister , G. , Schroeder-Heister , P. and Ehrenstein , W. H. 1990 . “ Spatial coding and spatio-anatomical mapping: Evidence for a hierarchical model of spatial stimulus–response compatibility ” . In Stimulus–response compatibility: An integrated perspective Edited by: Proctor , R. W. and Reeve , T. G. 117 – 144 . Amsterdam : North-Holland .
   Google Scholar
• Hommel , B. 1993 . The role of attention for the Simon effect . Psychological Research , 55 : 208 – 222 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornblum , S. , Hasbroucq , T. and Osman , A. 1990 . Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus–response compatibility—A model and taxonomy . Psychological Review , 97 : 253 – 270 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels , C. F. 1989 . S–R compatibilities depend on eccentricity of responding hand . Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 41A : 262 – 272 .
   Google Scholar
• Michaels , C. F. and Schilder , S. 1991 . Stimulus–response compatibilities between vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: The effects of hand position and posture . Perception & Psychophysics , 49 : 342 – 348 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoletti , R. , Umiltà , C. and Ladavas , E. 1984 . Compatibility due to the coding of the relative position of the effectors . Acta Psychologica , 57 : 133 – 143 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson , G. M. and Laxar , K. 1973 . Asymmetries in processing the terms “right” and “left” . Journal of Experimental Psychology , 100 : 284 – 290 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Proctor , R. W. and Dutta , A. 1993 . Do the same stimulus–response relations influence choice reactions initially and after practice? . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 19 : 922 – 930 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor , R. W. , Dutta , A. , Kelly , P. and Weeks , D. J. 1994 . Cross-modal compatibility effects with visuo–spatial and audio–verbal stimulus and response sets . Perception & Psychophysics , 35 : 42 – 47 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor , R. W. and Reeve , T. G. 1986 . Salient-feature coding operations in spatial precuing tasks . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. , 12 : 277 – 285 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor , R. W. and Reeve , T. G. , eds. 1990 . Stimulus–response compatibility: An integrated perspective Amsterdam : North-Holland .
   Google Scholar
• Reeve , T. G. and Proctor , R. W. 1984 . On the advance preparation of discrete finger responses . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 10 : 541 – 553 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve , T. G. and Proctor , R. W. 1990 . “ The salient-features coding principle for spatial- and symbolic-compatibility effects ” . In Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective Edited by: Proctor , R. W. and Reeve , T. G. 163 – 181 . Amsterdam : North-Holland .
   Google Scholar
• Reeve , T. G. , Proctor , R. W. , Weeks , D. J. and Dornier , L. 1992 . Salience of stimulus and response features in choice-reaction tasks . Perception & Psychophysics , 52 : 453 – 460 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umiltà , C. and Liotti , M. 1987 . Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S–R compatibility . Psychological Research , 49 : 81 – 90 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umiltà , C. and Nicoletti , R. 1990 . “ Spatial stimulus–response compatibility ” . In Stimulus–response compatibility: An integrated perspective Edited by: Proctor , R. W. and Reeve , T. G. 89 – 116 . Amsterdam : North-Holland .
   Google Scholar
• Wallace , R. J. 1971 . S–R compatibility and the idea of a response code . Journal of Experimental Psychology , 88 : 354 – 360 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weeks , D. J. and Proctor , R. W. 1990 . Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions . Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 119 : 355 – 366 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar