Embryological strategies for overcoming recurrent assisted reproductive technology treatment failure

References

• Alikani M, Calderon G, Tomkin G, Garrisi G, Kokot M, Cohen J. Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in vitro. Human Reproduction 2000; 15: 2634–2643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvero R, Miller B, Leondires M, Scott L. Differential blastocyst development of human embryos in different medium formulations. Proceedings of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, San Diego, CA, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Antczak M, Van Blerkom J. Temporal and spatial aspects of fragmentation in early human embryos: possible effects on developmental competence and association with the differential elimination of regulatory proteins from polarized domains. Human Reproduction 1999; 14: 429–447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker T, Franchi L. The structure of the chromosomes in human primordial oocytes. Chromasoma 1967; 22: 358–377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaban B, Urman B, Isklar A, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Mercan R, Mumcu A, Nunhglu A. The effects of pronuclear morphology on embryo quality parameters and blastocyst transfer outcome. Human Reproduction 2001; 16: 2357–2361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett DK, Kimura J, Bavister BD. Translocation of active mitochondria during hamster preimplantation embryo development studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Developmental Dynamics 1996; 205: 64–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bavister BD. Environmental factors important for in vitro fertilization in the hamster. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 1969; 18: 544–545
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buyalos R, Agarwal S. Endometriosis-associated infertility. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000; 12: 377–381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatot CL, Ziomek CA, Bavister BD, Lewis JL, Torres I. An improved culture medium supports the development of random-bred one-cell mouse embryos in vitro. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 1989; 86: 679–688
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen J, Alikani M, Trowbridge J, Rosenwaks Z. Implantation enhancement by selective assisted hatching using zona drilling of human embryos with poor prognosis. Human Reproduction 1992; 7: 685–691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozet N, Kanka J, Motlik J, Fulka J. Nucleolar fine structure and RNA synthesis in bovine oocytes from antral follicles. Gamete Research 1986; 14: 65–73
   Google Scholar
• Dawson KJ, Conaghan J, Ostera GR, Winston RML, Hardy K. Delaying transfer to the third day post-insemination, to select non-arrested embryos, increases development to the fetal heart stage. Human Reproduction 1995; 10: 177–182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai N, Goldstein J, Rowland D, Goldfarb J. Morphological evaluation of human embryos and derivation of an embryo quality scoring system specific for day 3 embryos: preliminary study. Human Reproduction 2000; 15: 2190–2196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dokras A, Sargent IL, Barlow DH. Human blastocyst grading: an indicator of developmental potential. Human Reproduction 1993; 8: 2119–2127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edirisinghe W, Ahnonkitpanit V, Promviengchai S, Suwajanakorn S, Pruksananonda KVC, Virutamasen P. A study failing to determine significant benefits from assisted hatching: patients selected for advanced age, zonal thickness of embryos, and previous failed attempts. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1999; 16: 294–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards RG, Beard HK. Oocyte polarity and cell determination in early mammalian embryos. Molecular Human Reproduction 1997; 3: 863–905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards RG, Steptoe PC, Purdy JM. Establishing full term human pregnancies using cleaving embryos grown in vitro. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1980; 87: 737–757
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards RG, Fischel SB, Cohen J, Fehilly CB, Purdy JM, Slater JM, Steptoe PC, Webster JM. Factors influencing the success of in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer 1984; 1: 3–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eppig JJ. The induction of oocyte maturation. Establishing a Successful Human Pregnancy. Serono Symposium Publications, RG Edwards. Raven Press, New York 1990; 66: 77–80, In
   Google Scholar
• Evanson D, Jost L, Marshall D, Zinaman M, Clegg E, Purvis K, de Angelis P, Claussen O. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Human Reproduction 1999; 14: 1039–1049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flechon J, Kopecny V. The nature of the ‘nucleolus precursor body˚s in early preimplantation embryos: a review of fine-structure cytochemical, immunochemical and autoradiographic data related to nucleolar function. Zygote 1998; 6: 183–191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemming TP, Warren PD, Chisholm TC, Johnson MH. Trophectodermal processes regulate the expression of totipotency within the inner cell mass of the mouse expanding blastocyst. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 1984; 84: 63–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garcia-Velasco J, Arici A. Is the endometrium or the oocyte/embryo affected in endometriosis?. Human Reproduction 1999; 14(Supplement 2)77–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner DK, Lane M. Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF?. Human Reproduction Update 1997; 832: 367–382
   Google Scholar
• Gardner DK, Vella P, Lane M. Culture and transfer of blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertility and Sterility 1998; 69: 84–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner RL. Can developmentally significant spatial patterning of the egg be discounted in mammals?. Human Reproduction Update 1996; 2: 3–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner RL. Polarity in early mammalian development. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 1999; 9: 417–421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner RL. Flow of cells from polar to mural trophectoderm is polarized in the mouse blastocyst. Human Reproduction 2000; 15: 694–701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianaroli L, Plachot M, Magli MC. The atlas of embryology. Human Reproduction 2000; 15: 1–79
   Google Scholar
• Goddard MJ, Pratt HPM. Control of events during early cleavage of the mouse embryo: an analysis of the two-cell block. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 1983; 73: 111–133
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goessens G. Nucleolar structure. International Reviews of Gytology 1984; 87: 107–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardarson T, Lofman C, Coull G, Sjogren A, Hamberger L, Edwards R. Internalization of cellular fragments in a human embryo: time-lapse recordings. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2002; 5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardson T, Hanson C, Sjogren A, Lundin K. Human embryos with unevenly sized blastomeres have lower pregnancy and implantation rates: indications for aneuploidy and multinucleation. Human Reproduction 2001; 16: 313–318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellebaut S, De Sutter P, Dozortsev DAO, Qian C, Dhont M. Does assisted hatching improve implantation rates after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection in all patients? A prospective randomized study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1996; 13: 19–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Hoffman D, Maxson W, Ory S. Clinical application of non-selective assisted hatching of human embryos. Fertility and Sterility 1996; 66: 991–994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyttel, P, Viuff, D, Laurincik, J, et al. Risk of in vitro production of cattle and swine embryos: aberrations in chromosome numbers, ribosomal RNA gene activation and peri-natal physiology. Human Reproduction 2000; 15(Supplement 5)87–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanzendorf S, Nehchiri F, Mayer J, Oehninger S, Muasher S. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study for the evaluation of assisted hatching in patients with advanced maternal age. Human Reproduction 1998; 13: 409–413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurincik J, Thomsen P, Hay-Schmidt A, Avery B, Greve T, Ochs R, Hyttel P. Nucleolar proteins and nuclear ultrastructure in preimplantation bovine embryos produced in vitro. Biology of Reproduction 2000; 62: 1024–1032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawitts JA, Biggers JD. Culture of preimplantation embryos. Methods in Enzymology 1993; 225: 153–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leese HJ. Energy metabolism of the blastocyst and uterus at implantation. Blastocyst Implantation, K Yoshinaga. Adams Publishing Group, Boston, MA 1989; 39–44, In
   Google Scholar
• Leese HJ. Metabolism of the preimplantation mammalian embryo. Oxford Reviews of Reproductive Biology 1991; 13: 35–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leese HJ. Metabolic control during preimplantation mammalian development. Human Reproduction Update 1995; 1: 63–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leese HJ, Conaghan J, Martin KL, Hardy K. Early human embryo metabolism. Bioessays 1993; 15: 259–264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leondires M, Escalps M, Segars J, Scott R, Miller B. Microdose follicular phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) 1999; 72: 1018–1023
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig M, Schopper B, Katalinic A, Strum R, Al-Hasani S, Diedrich K. Clinical use of a pronuclear stage score following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: impact on pregnancy rates under the conditions of the German embryo protection law. Human Reproduction 2000; 15: 325–329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus S, Brinsden P. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in women aged 40 years and over. Human Reproduction Update 1996; 2: 459–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motlik J, Crozet N, Fulka J. Meiotic competence in vitro of pig oocytes isolated from early antral follicles. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 1984a; 72: 323–328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Motlik J, Kopecny V, Pivko J. RNA synthesis in pig follicular oocytes. Autoradiographic and cytochemical study. Biology of the Cell 1984b; 50: 229–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muggleton-Harris AL, Brown JJG. Cytoplasmic factors influence mitochondrial reorganization and resumption of cleavage during culture of early mouse embryos. Human Reproduction 1988; 3: 1020–1028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munne S, Cohen J. Chromosome abnormalities in human embryos. Human Reproduction Update 1998; 4: 842–855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive D, Pritts E. Treatment of endometriosis. New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 345: 266–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne D, Flaherty SP, Barry MF, Mathews CD. Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time-lapse video cinematography. Human Reproduction 1997; 12: 532–541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellestor F, Girardet A, Andreo B, Arnal F, Humeau C. Relationship between morphology and chromosomal constitution in human preimplantation embryos. Molecular Reproduction and Development 1994; 39: 141–146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puissant F, Van Rysselberge M, Deweze J, Leroy F. Embryo score as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment. Human Reproduction 1987; 2: 705–708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn P, Moinipanah R, Steinberg JM, Weathersbee PS. Successful human in vitro fertilization using a modified human tubal fluid medium lacking glucose and phosphate ions. Fertility and Sterility 1995; 63: 922–924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racowsky C, Jackson K, Cekleniak N, Fox J, Hornstein M, Ginsburg E. The number of eight-cell embryos is a key determinant for selecting day 3 or day 5 transfer. Fertility and Sterility 2000; 73: 558–564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijnders PM, Jansen CAM. The predictive value of day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocyst formation, pregnancy and implantation rate after day 5 transfer following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Human Reproduction 1998; 13: 2869–2873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux C, Joanne C, Agnani G, Fromm M, Clavequin MC, Bresson JL. Morphometric parameters of living human in vitro fertilized embryos: importance of the asynchronous division process. Human Reproduction 1995; 10: 1201–1207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowy S, Tomkin G, Munne S. Impaired development of zygotes with uneven pronuclear size. Zygote 1998; 63: 137–141
   Google Scholar
• Sakkas D, Percival G, D'Arcy Y, Sharif K, Afnan M. Assessment of early cleaving human embryos at the 2-cell stage before transfer improves embryo selection. Fertility and Sterility 2002; 76: 1150–1156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathananthan AH, Kola I, Trounson A, Ng SC, Bongso A. Centrioles in the beginning of human development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 1991; 88: 4806–4810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatten G. The centrosome and its mode of inheritance: the reduction of he centrosome during gametogenesis and its restoration during fertilization. Developmental Biology 1994; 165: 299–335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholtes MCW, Zeilmaker GH. Blastocyst transfer in day-5 embryo transfer depends primarily on the number of oocytes retrieved and not the age. Fertility and Sterility 1998; 69: 78–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzacher H, Mosgoeller W. Ribosome biogenesis in man: current views on nucleolar structure and function. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 2000; 91: 243–252
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott LA, Smith S. The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval. Human Reproduction 1998; 13: 1003–1013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott LA, Alvero R, Leondires M, Miller BT. The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation. Human Reproduction 2000; 15: 2394–2403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoukir Y, Campana A, Farley T, Sakkas D. Early cleavage of in vitro fertilized human embryos to the 2-cell stage: a novel indicator of embryo quality and viability. Human Reproduction 1997; 12: 1531–1536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steer CV, Mills CL, Tan SL, Campbell S, Edwards RG. The cumulative embryo score: a predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme. Human Reproduction 1992; 7: 117–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein A, Rufas O, Amit S, Avrech O, Oinkas H, Ovidia J, Fisch B. Assisted hatching by partial zona dissection of human pre-embryos in patients with recurrent implantation failure after in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility 1995; 63: 838–841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan SL, Royston P, Cambell S. Cumulative conception and live birth rates after in vitro fertilization. Lancet 1992; 339: 1390–1394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesarik J, Greco E. The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Human Reproduction 1999; 14: 1318–1323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesarik J, Kopecny V. Development of human male pronucleus: ultrastructure and timing. Gamete Research 1989; 24: 135–149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tesarik J, Kopecny V. Assembly of the nuclear precursors bodies in human male pronuclei is correlated with an early RNA synthetic activity. Experimental Cell Research 1990; 191: 153–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesarik J, Mendoza C, Greco E. Paternal effects acting during the first cell cycle of human preimplantation development after ICSI. Human Reproduction 2002; 17: 184–187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Blerkom J, Davis P, Alexander S. A microscopic and biochemical study of fragmentation phenotypes in stage-appropriate human embryos. Human Reproduction 2001; 16: 719–729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, De Neubourg D, Laureys I. Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model. Human Reproduction 2001; 16: 326–332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittemer C, Bettahar-Lebugle K, Ohl J, Rongiers C, Nisand I, Gerlinger P. Zygote evaluation: an efficient tool for embryo selection. Human Reproduction 2000; 15: 2591–2597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar