The current status of preimplantation genetic screening: British Fertility Society Policy and Practice Guidelines

References

• Baart E. B., Martini E., van den Berg I., Macklon N. S., Galjaard R. J., Fauser B. C., Van Opstal D. Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF. Human Reproduction 2006; 21: 223–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baart E. B., Martini E., Eijkemans M. J., Van Opstal D., Beckers N. G., Verhoeff A., et al. Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: A randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction 2007a; 22: 980–988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baart E. B., van den Berg I., Martini E., Eussen H. J., Fauser B. C., Van Opstal D. FISH analysis of 15 chromosomes in human day 4 and 5 preimplantation embryos: The added value of extended aneuploidy detection. Prenatal Diagnosis 2007b; 27: 55–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J., Munné S. Comment 2 on Staessen et al. (2004). Two-cell biopsy and PGD pregnancy outcome. Human Reproduction 2005; 20: 2363–2364, author reply 2364–2365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos A., Van Steirteghem A. Aspects of biopsy procedures prior to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenatal Diagnosis 2001; 21: 767–780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delhanty J. D. Chromosome analysis by FISH in human preimplantation genetics. Human Reproduction 1997; 12: 153–155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delhanty J. D., Griffin D. K., Handyside A. H., Harper J., Atkinson G. H., Pieters M. H., Winston R. M. Detection of aneuploidy and chromosomal mosaicism in human embryos during preimplantation sex determination by fluorescent in situ hybridisation, (FISH). Human Molecular Genetics 1993; 2: 1183–1185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianaroli L., Magli M. C., Ferraretti A. P., Fiorentino A., Garrisi J., Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis increases the implantation rate in human in vitro fertilization by avoiding the transfer of chromosomally abnormal embryos. Fertility & Sterility 1997; 68: 1128–1131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianaroli L., Magli M. C., Ferraretti A. P., Munné S. Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: Identification of the categories for which it should be proposed. Fertility & Sterility 1999; 72: 837–844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy K., Martin K. L., Leese H. J., Winston R. M., Handyside A. H. Human preimplantation development in vitro is not adversely affected by biopsy at the 8-cell stage. Human Reproduction 1990; 5: 708–714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek S., Bossuyt P. M. M., Heineman M. J., Repping S., van der Veen F. Comment 1 on Staessen et al. (2004). Design and analysis of a randomized controlled trial studying preimplantation genetic screening. Human Reproduction 2005; 20: 2362–2366, author reply 2364–2365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek S., Twisk M., van Echten-Arends J., Sikkema-Raddatz B., Korevaar J. C., Verhoeve H. R., et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. New England Journal of Medicine 2007; 357: 9–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S., Alikani M., Tomkin G., Grifo J., Cohen J. Embryo morphology, developmental rates, & maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities. Fertility & Sterility 1995; 64: 382–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S., Chen S., Fischer J., Colls P., Zheng X., Stevens J., et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis reduces pregnancy loss in women aged 35 years and older with a history of recurrent miscarriages. Fertility & Sterility 2005; 84: 331–335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S., Gianaroli L., Tur-Kaspa I., Magli C., Sandalinas M., Grifo J., et al. Substandard application of preimplantation genetic screening may interfere with its clinical success. Fertility & Sterility 2007; 88: 781–784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platteau P., Staessen C., Michiels A., Van Steirteghem A., Liebaers I., Devroey P. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in patients with unexplained recurrent miscarriages. Fertility & Sterility 2005a; 83: 393–397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platteau P., Staessen C., Michiels A., Van Steirteghem A., Liebaers I., Devroey P. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in women older than 37 years. Fertility & Sterility 2005b; 84: 319–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society. The Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS) guidelines for good practice in PGD: Programme requirements and laboratory quality assurance. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 16: 134–147, 2008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sermon K. D., Michiels A., Harton G., Moutou C., Repping S., Scriven P. N., et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VI: Cycles from January to December 2003 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2004. Human Reproduction 2007; 22: 323–336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silber S., Escudero T., Lenahan K., Abdelhadi I., Kilani Z., Munné S. Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos derived from testicular sperm extraction. Fertility & Sterility 2003; 79: 30–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staessen C., Platteau P., Van Assche E., Michiels A., Tournaye H., Camus M., et al. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction 2004; 19: 2849–2858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens J., Wale P., Surrey E. S., Schoolcraft W. B. Is aneuploidy screening for patients aged 35 or over beneficial?. Fertility & Sterility 2004; 82(Suppl. 2)S249
   Google Scholar
• Tarin J. J., Handyside A. H. Embryo biopsy strategies for preimplantation diagnosis. Fertility & Sterility 1993; 59: 943–952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill A. R., deDie-Smulders C. E., Geraedts J. P., Harper J. C., Harton G. L., Lavery S. A., et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium ‘Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)’. Human Reproduction 2005; 20: 35–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twisk M., Mastenbroek S., van Wely M., Heineman M. J., Van der Veen F., Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening for abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database System Review 2006; 25: CD005291
   Google Scholar
• Twisk M., Haadsma M. L., van der Veen F., Repping S., Mastenbroek S., Heineman M. J., et al. Preimplantation genetic screening as an alternative to prenatal testing for Down syndrome: Preferences of women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment. Fertility & Sterility 2007, epub Mar 7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werlin L., Rodi I., DeCherney A., Marello E., Hill D., Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis as both a therapeutic and diagnostic tool in assisted reproductive technology. Fertility & Sterility 2003; 80: 467–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar