Clinical outcomes of magnetic activated sperm sorting in infertile men candidate for ICSI

References

• Agarwal, A., Durairajanayagam, D., & Du Plessis, S.S. (2014). Utility of antioxidants during assisted reproductive techniques: an evidence based review. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 12, 112. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avendaño, C., Franchi, A., Taylor, S., Morshedi, M., Bocca, S., & Oehninger, S. (2009). Fragmentation of DNA in morphologically normal human spermatozoa. Fertility and Sterility, 91, 1077–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benchaib, M., Lornage, J., Mazoyer, C., Lejeune, H., Salle, B., & François Guerin, J. (2007). Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as a prognostic indicator of assisted reproductive technology outcome. Fertility and Sterility, 87, 93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berteli, T.S., Da Broi, M.G., Martins, W.P., Ferriani, R.A., & Navarro, P.A. (2017). Magnetic activated cell sorting before double gradient centrifugation improves recovery of high quality spermatozoa. Andrology, 5, 776–782. doi: 10.1111/andr.12372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boomsma, C.M., Heineman, M.J., Cohlen, B.J., & Farquhar, C. (2007). Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD004507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004507.
   Google Scholar
• Bounartzi, T., Dafopoulos, K., Anifandis, G., Messini, C.I., Koutsonikou, C., Kouris, S., … Messinis, I.E. (2016). Pregnancy prediction by free sperm DNA and sperm DNA fragmentation in semen specimens of IVF/ICSI-ET patients. Human Fertility, 19, 56–62. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2016.1157629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G.C., Vilalta, A., & Fricker, M. (2015). Phagoptosis - cell death by phagocytosis - plays central roles in physiology, host defense and pathology. Current Molecular Medicine, 15, 842–851. doi: 10.2174/156652401509151105130628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucar, S., Gonçalves, A., Rocha, E., Barros, A., Sousa, M., & Sá, R. (2015). DNA fragmentation in human sperm after magnetic-activated cell sorting. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 32, 147–154. doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0370-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakar, Z., Cetinkaya, B., Aras, D., Koca, B., Ozkavukcu, S., Kaplanoglu, İ., … Cinar, O. (2016). Does combining magnetic-activated cell sorting with density gradient or swim-up improve sperm selection? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33, 1059–1065. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0742-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degheidy, T., Abdelfattah, H., Seif, A., Albuz, F.K., Gazi, S., & Abbas, S. (2015). Magnetic activated cell sorting: an effective method for reduction of sperm DNA fragmentation in varicocele men prior to assisted reproductive techniques. Andrologia, 47, 892–896. doi: 10.1111/and.12343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirican, E.K., Özgün, O.D., Akarsu, S., Akın, K.O., Ercan, Ö., Uğurlu, M., … Ünsal, A. (2008). Clinical outcome of magnetic activated cell sorting of non-apoptotic spermatozoa before density gradient centrifugation for assisted reproduction. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 25, 375–381. doi: 10.1007/s10815-008-9250-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves, S.C., Sánchez-Martín, F., Sánchez-Martín, P., Schneider, D.T., & Gosálvez, J. (2015). Comparison of reproductive outcome in oligozoospermic men with high sperm DNA fragmentation undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection with ejaculated and testicular sperm. Fertility and Sterility, 104, 1398–1405. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Ferreyra, J., Villegas, L., Romero, R., Zavala, P., Hilario, R., & Dueñas-Chacón, J. (2014). High pregnancy and implantation rates can be obtained using Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting (MACS) to selection Spermatozoa in patients with high levels of spermatic DNA fragmentation. Journal of Fertilization: In Vitro - IVF-Worldwide, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics & Stem Cell Biology, 3, 133. doi: 10.4172/2375-4508.1000133.
   Google Scholar
• Gil, M., Sar-Shalom, V., Melendez Sivira, Y., Carreras, R., & Checa, M.A. (2013). Sperm selection using magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 30, 479–485. doi: 10.1007/s10815-013-9962-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgetti, C., Terriou, P., Auquier, P., Hans, E., Spach, J.L., Salzmann, J., & Roulier, R. (1995). Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. Human Reproduction, 10, 2427–2431. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunewald, S., & Paasch, U. (2013). Sperm selection for ICSI using annexin V. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.), 927, 257–262. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-038-0_23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henkel, R. (2012). Sperm preparation: State-of-the-art–physiological aspects and application of advanced sperm preparation methods. Asian Journal of Andrology, 14, 260–269. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrero, M.B., Delbes, G., Chung, J.T., Son, W.Y., Holzer, H., Buckett, W., & Chan, P. (2013). Case report: The use of annexin V coupled with magnetic activated cell sorting in cryopreserved spermatozoa from a male cancer survivor: Healthy twin newborns after two previous ICSI failures. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 30, 1415–1419. doi: 10.1007/s10815-013-0086-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheirollahi-Kouhestani, M., Razavi, S., Tavalaee, M., Deemeh, M.R., Mardani, M., Moshtaghian, J., & Nasr-Esfahani, M.H. (2009). Selection of sperm based on combined density gradient and Zeta method may improve ICSI outcome. Human Reproduction, 24, 2409–2416. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukaszuk, K., Wcislo, M., Liss, J., Stachowicz, A., Jakiel, G., Lukaszuk, M., … Bialobrzeska, D. (2015). First pregnancy, somatic and psychological status of a 4-year-old child born following annexin V TESA sperm separation. American Journal of Perinatology Reports, 5, e105–e108. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1548726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirroshandel, S.A., Ghasemian, F., & Monji-Azad, S. (2016). Applying data mining techniques for increasing implantation rate by selecting best sperms for intra- cytoplasmic sperm injection treatment. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 137, 215–229. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.09.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr-Esfahani, M.H., Deemeh, M.R., & Tavalaee, M. (2012). New era in sperm selection for ICSI. International Journal of Andrology, 35, 475–484. Review. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01227.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pacey, A.A., Coughlan, C., Clarke, H., Cutting, R., Saxton, J., Waite, S., … Li, T. (2015). Sperm DNA fragmentation, recurrent implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage. Asian Journal of Andrology, 17, 681–685. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.144946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo, G.D., Neri, Q.V., & Rosenwaks, Z. (2015). To ICSI or not to ICSI. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 33, 92–102. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1546825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappa, K.L., Rodriguez, H.F., Hakkarainen, G.C., Anchan, R.M., Mutter, G.L., & Asghar, W. (2016). Sperm processing for advanced reproductive technologies: Where are we today? Biotechnology Advances, 34, 578–587. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.01.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawe, V.Y., Boudri, H.U., Alvarez Sedó, C., Carro, M., Papier, S., & Nodar, F. (2010). Healthy baby born after reduction of sperm DNA fragmentation using cell sorting before ICSI. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 20, 320–323. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romany, L., Garrido, N., Motato, Y., Aparicio, B., Remohí, J., & Meseguer, M. (2014). Removal of annexin V-positive sperm cells for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in ovum donation cycles does not improve reproductive outcome: A controlled and randomized trial in unselected males. Fertility and Sterility, 102, 1567–1575. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, T.M., Agarwal, A., Zborowski, M., Grunewald, S., Glander, H.J., & Paasch, U. (2007). Utility of magnetic cell separation as a molecular sperm preparation technique. Journal of Andrology, 29, 134–142. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.107.003632.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Said, T.M., & Land, J.A. (2011). Effects of advanced selection methods on sperm quality and ART outcome: A systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 17, 719–733. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakkas, D., Manicardi, G.C., Tomlinson, M., Mandrioli, M., Bizzaro, D., Bianchi, P.G., & Bianchi, U. (2000). The use of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swim- up method to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies. Human Reproduction, 15, 1112–1116. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.5.1112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakkas, D. (2013). Novel technologies for selecting the best sperm for in vitro fertilization and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertility and Sterility, 99, 1023–1029. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seli, E., Gardner, D.K., Schoolcraft, W.B., Moffatt, O., & Sakkas, D. (2004). Extent of nuclear DNA damage in ejaculated spermatozoa impacts on blastocyst development after in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 82, 378–383. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.12.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikhi, A., Jalali, M., Gholamian, M., Jafarzadeh, A., Jannati, S., & Mousavifar, N. (2013). Elimination of apoptotic spermatozoa by magnetic-activated cell sorting improves the fertilization rate of couples treated with ICSI procedure. Andrology, 1, 845–849. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00140.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, L., Brunborg, G., Stevenson, M., Lutton, D., McManus, J., & Lewis, S.E. (2010). Clinical significance of sperm DNA damage in assisted reproduction outcome. Human Reproduction, 25, 1594–1608. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, L., Murphy, K., Shamsi, M.B., Liu, L., Emery, B., Aston, K.I., … Carrell, D.T. (2014). Paternal influence of sperm DNA integrity on early embryonic development. Human Reproduction, 29, 2402–2412. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, L., Zini, A., Dyachenko, A., Ciampi, A., & Carrell, D.T. (2016). A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of sperm DNA damage on in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Asian Journal of Andrology, 19, 80–90. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.182822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T.B., Cortez-Retamozo, V., Grigoryeva, L.S., Hill, E., Pittet, M.J., & Da Silva, N. (2014). Mononuclear phagocytes rapidly clear apoptotic epithelial cells in the proximal epididymis. Andrology, 2, 755–762. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2014.00251.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavalaee, M., Deemeh, M.R., Arbabian, M., & Nasr-Esfahani, M.H. (2012). Density gradient centrifugation before or after magnetic-activated cell sorting: Which technique is more useful for clinical sperm selection? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 29, 31–38. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9686-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terriou, P., Giorgetti, C., Hans, E., Salzmann, J., Charles, O., Cignetti, L., … Roulier, R. (2007). Relationship between even early cleavage and day 2 embryo score and assessment of their predictive value for pregnancy. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 14, 294–299. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60870-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torki-Boldaji, B., Tavalaee, M., Bahadorani, M., & Nasr-Esfahani, M.H. (2017). Selection of physiological spermatozoa during intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Andrologia, 49, 1–6. doi: 10.1111/and.12579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troya, J., & Zorrilla, I. (2015). Annexin V-MACS in infertile couples as method for separation of sperm without DNA fragmentation. JBRA Assisted Reproduction, 19, 66–69. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20150015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velez de la Calle, J.F., Muller, A., Walschaerts, M., Clavere, J.L., Jimenez, C., Wittemer, C., & Thonneau, P. (2008). Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as assessed by the sperm chromatin dispersion test in assisted reproductive technology programs: Results of a large prospective multicenter study. Fertility and Sterility, 90, 1792–1799. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virro, M.R., Larson-Cook, K.L., & Evenson, D.P. (2004). Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertility and Sterility, 81, 1289–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpes, A., Sammartano, F., Rizzari, S., Gullo, S., Marino, A., & Allegra, A. (2016). The pellet swim-up is the best technique for sperm preparation during in vitro fertilization procedures. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33, 765–770. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0696-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). (2010). World health organization laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization. 287 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C., Milne, S., & Leeson, H. (2014). Sperm DNA damage caused by oxidative stress: modifiable clinical, lifestyle and nutritional factors in male infertility. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 28, 684–703. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahedi, A., Tavalaee, M., Deemeh, M.R., Azadi, L., Fazilati, M., & Nasr-Esfahani, M.H. (2013). Zeta potential vs apoptotic marker: Which is more suitable for ICSI sperm selection? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 30, 1181–1186. doi: 10.1007/s10815-013-0022-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarei-Kheirabadi, M., Shayegan Nia, E., Tavalaee, M., Deemeh, M.R., Arabi, M., Forouzanfar, M., … Nasr-Esfahani, M.H. (2012). Evaluation of ubiquitin and annexin V in sperm population selected based on density gradient centrifugation and zeta potential (DGC-Zeta). Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 29, 365–371. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9689-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zini, A., Boman, J.M., Belzile, E., & Ciampi, A. (2008). Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction, 23, 2663–2668. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar