Publication Cover
Human Fertility
an international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice
Volume 23, 2020 - Issue 3
2,331
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Women’s experience of social egg freezing: perceptions of success, risks, and ‘going it alone’

&
Pages 186-192 | Received 20 Jun 2018, Accepted 15 Aug 2018, Published online: 01 Nov 2018

References

  • Avraham, S., Machtinger, R., Cahan, T., Sokolov, A., Racowsky, C., & Seidman, D.S. (2014). What is the quality of information on social oocyte cryopreservation provided by websites of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology member fertility clinics? Fertility and Sterility, 101, 222–226. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.008.
  • Baldwin, K. (2017). ‘I suppose I think to myself, that’s the best way to be a mother’: How ideologies of parenthood shape women’s use of social egg freezing. Sociological Research Online, 22, 1–15. doi: 10.5153/sro.4187.
  • Baldwin, K. (2018). Conceptualising women’s motivations for social egg freezing and experience of reproductive delay. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40, 859–873. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12728.
  • Baldwin, K., Culley, L., Hudson, N., & Mitchell, H. (2018). Running out of time: Exploring women’s motivations for social egg freezing. Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2018.1460352.
  • Becker, G. (1997). Disrupted lives: How people create meaning in a chaotic world. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
  • Bewley, S., Davies, M., & Braude, P. (2005). Which career first?. British Medical Journal, 331, 588–589. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7517.588.
  • Bhatia, R., & Campo-Engelstein, L. (2018). The biomedicalization of social egg freezing: A comparative analysis of European and American professional ethics opinions and US news and popular media. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43, 864–887. doi: 10.1177/0162243918754322.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Cobo, A., García-Velasco, J.A., Coello, A., Domingo, J., Pellicer, A., & Remohí, J. (2016). Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation. Fertility and Sterility, 105, 755–764. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.027.
  • Daniluk, J.C., & Koert, E. (2013). The other side of the fertility coin: a comparison of childless men’s and women’s knowledge of fertility and assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and Sterility, 99, 839–846. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.10.033.
  • Dondorp, W.J., & De Wert, G.M. (2009). Fertility preservation for healthy women: Ethical aspects. Human Reproduction, 24, 1779–1785. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep102.
  • Doyle, J.O., Richter, K.S., Lim, J., Stillman, R.J., Graham, J.R., & Tucker, M.J. (2016). Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval. Fertility and Sterility, 105, 459–466. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.026.
  • ESHRE: The ESHRE Working Group on Oocyte Cryopreservation in Europe; Shenfield, F., De Mouzon, J., Scaravelli, G., Kupka, M., Ferraretti, A.P., Prados, F.J., & Goossens, V. (2017). Oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in European countries: Statutory background, practice, storage and use. Human Reproduction Open, 2017, hox003. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hox003.
  • Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., Pritchard, N., Hickey, M., Peate, M., McBain, J., … Fisher, J. (2017). Reproductive experiences of women who cryopreserved oocytes for non-medical reasons. Human Reproduction, 32, 575–581. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew342.
  • Hodes-Wertz, B., Druckenmiller, S., Smith, M., & Noyes, N. (2013). What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility?. Fertility and Sterility, 100, 1343–1349.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.201.
  • Jackson, E. (2018). The ambiguities of ‘social’ egg freezing and the challenges of informed consent. BioSocieties, 13, 21–40. doi: 10.1057/s41292-017-0044-5.
  • Mac Dougall, K., Beyene, Y., & Nachtigall, R.D. (2012). ‘Inconvenient biology:’ advantages and disadvantages of first-time parenting after age 40 using in vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction, 27, 1058–1065. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des007.
  • Mayes, C., Williams, J., & Lipworth, W. (2018). Conflicted hope: Social egg freezing and clinical conflicts of interest. Health Sociology Review, 27, 45–59. doi: 10.1080/14461242.2017.1349545.
  • Mertes, H., & Pennings, G. (2011). Social egg freezing: For better, not for worse. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 23, 824–829. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.09.010.
  • Pritchard, N., Kirkman, M., Hammarberg, K., McBain, J., Agresta, F., Bayly, C., … Fisher, J. (2017). Characteristics and circumstances of women in Australia who cryopreserved their oocytes for non-medical indications. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 35, 108–118. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2016.1275533.
  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. (2018). RCOG suggests caution over social egg freezing. Retrieved from https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/rcog-suggests-caution-over-social-egg-freezing/ (Accessed 10 August 2018).
  • Saumet, J., Petropanagos, A., Buzaglo, K., McMahon, E., Warraich, G., & Mahutte, N. (2018). No. 356-egg freezing for age-related fertility decline. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 40, 356–368. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.08.004.
  • The Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. (2013). Mature oocyte cryopreservation: A guideline. Fertility and Sterility, 99, 37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.028.
  • Waldby, C. (2015). ‘Banking time’: Egg freezing and the negotiation of future fertility. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17, 470–482. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.951881.
  • Wilkinson, J., Vail, A., & Roberts, S.A. (2017). Direct-to-consumer advertising of success rates for medically assisted reproduction: A review of national clinic websites. BMJ Open, 7, e012218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012218.
  • Wyndham, N., Marin Figueira, P.G., & Patrizio, P. (2012). A persistent misperception: Assisted reproductive technology can reverse the “aged biological clock”. Fertility and Sterility, 97, 1044–1047. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.015.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.