Anonymous Dutch sperm donors releasing their identity

References

• Baard, L., & Van der Mee, T. (2017). Spermadokter Karbaat verwekte 19 donorkinderen. Algemeen Dagblad, May 24, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.ad.nl/binnenland/spermadokter-karbaat-verwekte-18-donorkinderen∼af51485f/.
   Google Scholar
• Bay, B., Larsen, P.B., Kesmodel, U.S., & Ingerslev, H.J. (2014). Danish sperm donors across three decades: Motivations and attitudes. Fertility and Sterility, 101, 252–257.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., Frith, L., & van den Akker, O. (2017). Gamete donors’ reasons for, and expectations and experiences of, registration with a voluntary donor linking register. Human Fertility, 20, 268–278. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2017.1292005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M. (2018). Direct-to-consumer DNA testing: the fallout for individuals and their families unexpectedly learning of their donor conception origins. Human Fertility, 21, 225–228. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2017.1339127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., Daniels, K., Adams, D., Bourne, K., van Hooff, J.A.P., Kramer, W., & Thorn, P. (2015). Emerging models for facilitating contact between people genetically related through donor conception: A preliminary analysis and discussion. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 1, 71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2015.10.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daniels, K., Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., & Curson, R. (2005). Previous semen donors and their views regarding the sharing of information with offspring. Human Reproduction, 20, 1670–1675. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K. (2007). Anonymity and openness and the recruitment of gamete donors. Part I: Semen donors. Human Fertility, 10, 151–158. doi: 10.1080/14647270601110298.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, T., Jadva, V., & Slutsky, J. (2016). Sperm donors limited. In: S. Golombok, & S. Wilkinson (Eds.), Regulating reproductive donation (pp. 164–184). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gezondheidsraad (Health Council of the Netherlands). (2013). Het maximum aantal kinderen per spermadonor [The maximum number of donor children per donor]. Den Haag: Gezondheidsraad.
   Google Scholar
• Grotenhuis, M., & Matthijssen, A. (2005). Multiple response. In M. Grotenhuis & A. Matthijssen (Eds), Basiscursus SPSS: versie 10-14. (pp. 1–16). Van Gorcum: Assen.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, J.C., Kennett, D., & Reisel, D. (2016). The end of donor anonymity: How genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business. Human Reproduction, 31, 1135–1140. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2011). Sperm and oocyte donors' experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring. Human Reproduction, 26, 638–645. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens, P.M.W., Simons, A.H.M., Van Kooij, R.J., Blokzijl, E., & Dunselman, G.A.J. (2006). A new Dutch Law regulating provision of identifying information of donors to offspring: background, content and impact. Human Reproduction, 21, 852–856. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzen, T. (2018). Autosomal DNA testing comparison chart. International Society of Genetic Genealogy Wiki. Retrieved from https://isogg.org/wiki/Autosomal_DNA_testing_comparison_chart.
   Google Scholar
• Kreulen, E. (2017). Ook een centraal register van zaaddonoren kan misstanden niet uitsluiten. Trouw, August 22, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.trouw.nl/home/ook-een-centraal-register-van-zaaddonoren-kan-misstanden-niet-uitsluiten∼ad3a98e9/.
   Google Scholar
• Lalos, A., Daniels, K., Gottlieb, C., & Lalos, O. (2003). Recruitment and motivation of semen providers in Sweden. Human Reproduction, 18, 212–216. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagtegaal, B. (2016). Inspectie: registratie zaaddonoren moet beter. NRC, September 27, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2016/09/27/inspectie-registratie-zaaddonoren-moet-beter-a1523509.
   Google Scholar
• Pacey, A.A. (2018). No more donor secrets in the genomic age. Human Fertility, 21, 223–224. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2018.1533065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postema, D., & Maas, J. (2017). Het einde van donoranonimiteit, een diep gekoesterde wens die kan uitkomen [The end of donor anonymity, a deeply cherished wish that can come true]. Jeugdbeleid, 11, 57–63. doi: 10.1007/s12451-017-0137-y.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, D.W., & Russell, L. (2011). Characteristics of men willing to act as sperm donors in the context of identity-release legislation. Human Reproduction, 26, 266–272. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J.N., Forman, R.G., Clark, A.M., Egan, D.M., Chapman, M.G., & Barlow, D.H. (1991). Attitudes of donors and recipients to gamete donation. Human Reproduction, 6, 307–309. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheib, J.E., Ruby, A., & Benward, J. (2017). Who requests their sperm donor's identity? The first ten years of information releases to adults with open-identity donors. Fertility and Sterility, 107, 483–493. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers, E. (2017). Kamerbrief Actieplan ondersteuning donorkinderen. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport. Retrieved from https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/kamerstukken/2017/07/04/kamerbrief-over-actieplan-ondersteuning-donorkinderen.
   Google Scholar
• Sydsjö, G., Lampic, C., Brändström, S., Gudmundsson, J., Karlström, P.-O., Solensten, N.G., … Skoog Svanberg, A. (2012). Who becomes a sperm donor: personality characteristics in a national sample of identifiable donors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 119, 33–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03172.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thijssen, A., Provoost, V., Vandormael, E., Dhont, N., Pennings, G., & Ombelet, W. (2017). Motivations and attitudes of candidate sperm donors in Belgium. Fertility and Sterility, 108, 539–547. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorn, P., Katzorke, T., & Daniels, K. (2008). Semen donors in Germany: A study exploring motivations and attitudes. Human Reproduction, 23, 2415–2420. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Akker, O., Crawshaw, M., Blyth, E., & Frith, L. (2015). Expectations and experiences of gamete donors and donor-conceived adults searching for genetic relatives using DNA linking through a voluntary register. Human Reproduction, 30, 111–121. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, U., Vandermeeren, M., Vanderschueren, D., Enzlin, P., Demyttenaere, K., & D'Hooghe, T. (2013). A systematic review of sperm donors: Demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Human Reproduction Update, 19, 37–51. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wiel, C. (2017). Spermadonor verwekte veel meer kinderen dan toegestaan. NRC, August 19, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2017/08/19/spermadonor-verwekte-veel-meer-kinderen-dan-toegestaan-a1570475.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rooij, F., & Mochtar, M. (2017). Toelichting op het ZonMW eindverslag van de Badok studie. Universiteit van Amsterdam. Retrieved from https://www.zonmw.nl/fileadmin/zonmw/documenten/Geneesmiddelen/Toelichting_eindverslag_Badok_studie_20-07-2017_pdf.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, M., Mochtar, M.H., De Melker, A.A., Van Der Veen, F., Repping, S., & Gerrits, T. (2016). Psychosocial counselling of identifiable sperm donors. Human Reproduction, 31, 1066–1074. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K. (2016). Limiting offspring numbers. In: S. Golombok & S. Wilkinson (Eds.), Regulating reproductive donation (pp. 185–204). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar