Previous caesarean section is associated with lower subsequent in vitro fertilization live birth rates

References

• Akman, M.A., Erden, H.F., & Bahceci, M. (2005). Endometrial fluid visualized through ultrasonography during ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles impairs the outcome in tubal factor, but not PCOS, patients. Human Reproduction, 20, 906–909. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barau, G., Robillard, P.-Y., Hulsey, T.C., Dedecker, F., Laffite, A., Gérardin, P., & Kauffmann, E. (2006). Linear association between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of caesarean section in term deliveries. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 113, 1173–1177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01038.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, A., & Reddy, U.M. (2012). Epidemiology of cesarean delivery: the scope of the problem. Seminars in Perinatology, 36, 308–314. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Buckingham, K., Abou-Setta, A.M., & Buckett, W. (2010). Ultrasound versus “clinical touch” for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2010, CD006107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006107.pub3.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Buckingham, K., Buckett, W., & Abou-Setta, A.M. (2016). Ultrasound versus ‘clinical touch’ for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 17, CD006107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006107.pub4.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, E.C., McDermott, K.C., Blomquist, J.L., & Handa, V.L. (2014). Mode of delivery and subsequent fertility. Human Reproduction, 29, 2569–2574. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fussing-Clausen, C., Geirsson, R.T., Hansen, T., Rasmussen, S., Lidegaard, Ø., & Hedegaard, M. (2014). Mode of delivery and subsequent reproductive patterns. A national follow-up study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 93, 1034–1041. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubbini, G., Centini, G., Nascetti, D., Marra, E., Moncini, I., Bruni, L., … Florio, P. (2011). Surgical hysteroscopic treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring fertility: Prospective Study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 18, 234–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2010.10.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurol-Urganci, I., Bou-Antoun, S., Lim, C.P., Cromwell, D.A., Mahmood, T.A., Templeton, A., & van der Meulen, J.H. (2013). Impact of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction, 28, 1943–1952. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurol-Urganci, I., Cromwell, D.A., Mahmood, T.A., van der Meulen, J.H., & Templeton, A. (2014). A population-based cohort study of the effect of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility. Human Reproduction, 29, 1320–1326. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbin Consensus Conference Workshop Group. (2014). Improving the Reporting of Clinical Trials of Infertility Treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statement. Fertility and Sterility, 102, 952–959.e15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmerhorst, F.M., Perquin, D.A.M., Donker, D., & Keirse, M.J.N.C. (2004). Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. British Medical Journal, 328, 261. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.37957.560278.EE.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacques, M., Freour, T., Barriere, P., & Ploteau, S. (2016). Adverse pregnancy and neo-natal outcomes after assisted reproductive treatment in patients with pelvic endometriosis: a case-control study. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 32, 626–634. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutsaerts, M.A.Q., van Oers, A.M., Groen, H., Burggraaff, J.M., Kuchenbecker, W.K.H., Perquin, D.A.M., … Hoek, A. (2016). Randomized trial of a lifestyle program in obese infertile women. New England Journal of Medicine, 374, 1942–1953. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1505297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill, S.M., Kearney, P.M., Kenny, L.C., Khashan, A.S., Henriksen, T.B., Lutomski, J.E., & Greene, R.A. (2013). Caesarean delivery and subsequent stillbirth or miscarriage: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 8, e54588. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill, S.M., Khashan, A.S., Henriksen, T.B., Kenny, L.C., Kearney, P.M., Mortensen, P.B., … Agerbo, E. (2014). Does a Caesarean section increase the time to a second live birth? A register-based cohort study. Human Reproduction, 29, 2560–2568. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill, S.M., Khashan, A.S., Kenny, L.C., Kearney, P.M., Mortensen, P.B., Greene, R.A., … Henriksen, T.B. (2015). Time to subsequent live birth according to mode of delivery in the first birth. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 122, 1207–1215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patounakis, G., Ozcan, M.C., Chason, R.J., Norian, J.M., Payson, M., DeCherney, A.H., & Yauger, B.J. (2016). Impact of a prior cesarean delivery on embryo transfer: a prospective study. Fertility and Sterility, 106, 311–316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberge, S., Demers, S., Girard, M., Vikhareva, O., Markey, S., Chaillet, N., … Bujold, E. (2016). Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 214, 507.e1–507.e6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stylianou, C., Critchlow, D., Brison, D.R., & Roberts, S.A. (2012). Embryo morphology as a predictor of IVF success: an evaluation of the proposed UK ACE grading scheme for cleavage stage embryos. Human Fertility, 15, 11–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/14647273.2011.652251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanimura, S., Funamoto, H., Hosono, T., Shitano, Y., Nakashima, M., Ametani, Y., & Nakano, T. (2015). New diagnostic criteria and operative strategy for cesarean scar syndrome: Endoscopic repair for secondary infertility caused by cesarean scar defect. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 41, 1363–1369. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templeton, A., Morris, J.K., & Parslow, W. (1996). Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment. The Lancet, 348, 1402–1406. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05291-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vervoort, A.J.M.W., Uittenbogaard, L.B., Hehenkamp, W.J.K., Brölmann, H.A.M., Mol, B.W.J., & Huirne, J.A.F. (2015). Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Human Reproduction, 30, 2695–2702. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-Q., Yin, T.-L., Xu, W.-M., Qi, Q.-R., Wang, X.-C., & Yang, J. (2017). Reproductive outcomes in women with prior cesarean section undergoing in vitro fertilization: A retrospective case-control study. Current Medical Science, 37, 922–927. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-017-1828-3.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, N., Chen, H., Xu, Z., Wang, B., Sun, H., & Hu, Y. (2016). Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in patient with previous cesarean scar. Medical Science Monitor, 22, 3288–3295. doi: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.900581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., Hukkelhoven, C., Offerhaus, P., Zwart, J., Jonge, A. D., & Geerts, C. (2016). Modest rise in caesarean section from 2000-2010: The Dutch experience. PLoS One, 11, e0155565. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar