References
- Becker, G., Butler, A., & Nachtigall, R.D. (2005). Resemblance talk: A challenge for parents whose children were conceived with donor gametes in the US. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 1300–1309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscime.2005.01.018.
- Bokek-Cohen, Y. (2016a). How are marketing strategies of genetic material used as a mechanism for biopolitical governmentality? Consumption Markets & Culture, 19, 534–554. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2015.1137897.
- Bokek-Cohen, Y. (2016b). Jewish law, scarcity of sperm donors and the consequent private import of sperm of non-Jews by Israeli women. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 81, 105–111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000435880.
- Bokek-Cohen, Y., & Gonen, L.D. (2015). Sperm and simulacra: Emotional capitalism and sperm donation industry. New Genetics and Society, 34, 243–273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2015.1032401.
- Bokek-Cohen, Y., Peres, Y., & Kanazawa, S. (2008). Rational Choice and Evolutionary Psychology as explanations for mate selectivity. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2, 42–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099356.
- Botwin, M.D., Buss, D.M., & Shackelford, T.K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65, 107–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00531.x.
- Burr, J. (2009). Fear, fascination and the sperm donor as ‘abjection’ in interviews with heterosexual recipients of donor insemination. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31, 705–718. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01171.x.
- Buss, D.M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Buss, D. M. (2013). Mate preferences questionnaire. Measurement instrument database for the social sciences. Retrieved from http://www.midss.org/content/mate-preferences-questionnaire
- Buss, D.M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559–570. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559.
- Buss, D.M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Asherian, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., … Yang, K.-S. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates a study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022190211001.
- Catz, D.S., Green, N.S., Tobin, J.N., Lloyd-Puryear, M.A., Kyler, P., Umemoto, A., … Wolman, F. (2005). Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations. Public Health Genomics, 8, 161–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000086759.
- Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D.M. (2016). Mate Preferences. In T. K. Shackelford & V. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1–11). Austin, TX, USA: The University of Texas at Austin.
- Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D.M., Pham, M.N., & Shackelford, T.K. (2015). How sexually dimorphic are human mate preferences? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1082–1093. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215590987.
- Fales, M.R., Frederick, D.A., Garcia, J.R., Gildersleeve, K.A., Haselton, M.G., & Fisher, H.E. (2016). Mating markets and bargaining hands: Mate preferences for attractiveness and resources in two national US studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 78–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.041.
- Fisher, R.A. (1915). The evolution of sexual preference. The Eugenics Review, 7, 184–192. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2987134/[PMC]21259607]
- Fisher, R.A. (1958). The genetical theory of natural selection. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Dover.
- Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2008). Gamete donation: Parents’ experiences of searching for their child’s donor siblings and donor. Human Reproduction, 24, 505–516. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den469.
- Furnham, A., Salem, N., & Lester, D. (2014). Selecting egg and sperm donors: The role of age, social class, ethnicity, height and personality. Psychology, 5, 220–229. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.53033.
- Grace, V.M., Daniels, K.R., & Gillett, W. (2008). The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family: Parents’ constructions in the case of donor insemination. Social Science & Medicine, 66, 301–314. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.029.
- Graham, S. (2012). Choosing single motherhood? Single women negotiating the nuclear family ideal. In D. Cutas, & S. Chan (Eds.), Families: Beyond the nuclear ideal (pp. 97–110). London: Bloomsbury Academic Series.
- Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4.
- Hanson, A.F. (2001). Donor insemination: Eugenic and feminist implications. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 15, 287–311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2001.15.3.287.
- Ignovska, E. (2014). Sperm donors as assisters of reproduction in single women. Global Bioethics, 25, 226–238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2014.957951.
- Jadva, V., Badger, S., Morrissette, M., Golombok, S. (2009). 'Mom by choice, single by life's circumstance…’: Findings from a large-scale survey of the experiences of single mothers by choice. Human Fertility, 12, 175–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/14647270903373867.
- Jones, C. (2005). Looking like a family: Negotiating bio-genetic continuity in British lesbian families using licensed donor insemination. Sexualities, 8, 221–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460705050856.
- Kramer, W., & Cahn, N. (2013). Finding our families: A first-of-its-kind book for donor-conceived people and their families. New York (NY): Penguin.
- Rodino, I.S., Burton, P.J., & Sanders, K.A. (2011). Mating by proxy: A novel perspective to donor conception. Fertility and Sterility, 96, 998–1001. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1090.
- Sandberg, J.C., Rodriguez, G., Howard, T.D., Quandt, S.A., & Arcury, T.A. (2017). “He beat you in the blood”: Knowledge and beliefs about the transmission of traits among Latinos from Mexico and Central America. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 19, 170–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-015-0311-0.
- Scheib, J.E. (1994). Sperm donor selection and the psychology of female mate choice. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 113–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90035-3.
- Scheib, J.E. (1997). Female choice in the context of donor insemination. In P. A. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology (pp. 489–504). Boston, MA: Spring.
- Scheib, J.E., Kristiansen, A., & Wara, A.A. (1997). A Norwegian note on sperm donor selection and the psychology of female mate choice. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 143–149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(96)00115-8.
- Trivers, R.L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
- Whyte, S., & Torgler, B. (2015). Selection criteria in the search for a sperm donor: Behavioural traits versus physical appearance. Journal of Bioeconomics, 17, 151–171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2016.06.001.
- Whyte, S., & Torgler, B. (2016). Determinants of online sperm donor success: How women choose. Applied Economics Letters, 23, 592–596. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1090543.
- Whyte, S., Torgler, B., & Harrison, K.L. (2016). What women want in their sperm donor: A study of more than 1000 women’s sperm donor selections. Economics & Human Biology, 23, 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2016.06.001.
- Zeifman, D.M., & Ma, J.E. (2013). Experimental examination of women's selection criteria for sperm donors versus life partners. Personal Relationships, 20, 311–327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01409.x.