References
- Annotti, L. A., & Teglasi, H. (2017). Functioning in the real world: Using storytelling to improve validity in the assessment of executive functions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(3), 254–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1205075
- ASRM: Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. (2017). Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: an ASRM Practice Committee guideline. Fertility and Sterility, 107(2), e3–e10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.007
- Bellak, L. (1993). The T.A.T., C.A.T., and S.A.T. in Clinical Use, Fifth Edition. Allyn and Bacon.
- Blyth, E. (1994). I wanted to be interesting. I wanted to be able to say ‘I’ve done something interesting with my life’”: interviews with surrogate mothers in Britain. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 12(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02646839408408885
- Braverman, A. M. (2015). Mental health counseling in third-party reproduction in the United States: Evaluation, psychoeducation, or ethical gatekeeping? Fertility and Sterility, 104(3), 501–506. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.023
- Braverman, A. M., & Corson, S. L. (1992). Characteristics of participants in a gestational carrier program. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 9(4), 353–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203959
- Bruss, G. S., & Nunno, K. M., (2002). Axis I and personality profiles of gestational surrogates. Fertility and Sterility, 77(Suppl.3), S18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03045-5
- Cabra, R., Alduncin, A., Cabra, J. R., Ek, L. H., Briceno, M., & Mendoza, P. B. (2018). Gestational surrogacy. Medical, psychological and legal aspects: 9 years of experience in Mexico. Human Reproduction Open, 2018(1), hox029. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hox029
- Ciccarelli, J. C., & Beckman, L. J. (2005). Navigating rough waters: An overview of psychological aspects of surrogacy. The Journal of Social Issues, 61(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2005.00392.x
- Cramer, P. (2000). Defense mechanisms in psychology today: Further processes for adaptation. The American Psychologist, 55(6), 637–646. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.637
- Eron, L. D. (1953). Responses of women to the thematic apperception test. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 17(4), 269–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062829
- Eron, L. D., Terry, D., & Callahan, R. (1950). The use of rating scales for emotional tone of TAT stories. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 14(6), 473–478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062406
- Franks, D. (1981). Psychiatric evaluation of women in a surrogate mother program. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 138(10), 1378–1380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.138.10.1378
- Groth-Marnat, G. (2009). Handbook of psychological assessment (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
- Henry, W. E. (1956). The analysis of fantasy: The thematic apperception technique in the study of personality. Wiley.
- Hopwood, C. J., & Bornstein, R. F. (Eds.) (2014). Multimethod clinical assessment. The Guilford Press.
- Jadva, V., Murray, C., Lycett, E., MacCallum, F., & Golombok, S. (2003). Surrogacy: the experiences of surrogate mothers. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)), 18(10), 2196–2204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg397
- Jenkins, S. R. (2014). Thematic apperceptive techniques inform a science of individuality. Rorschachiana, 35(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1192-5604/a000065
- Jenkins, S. R. (2017b). Not your same old story: New rules for thematic apperceptive techniques (TATs). Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(3), 238–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1248972
- Jenkins, S. R. (2017a). The narrative arc of TATs: Introduction to the JPA special section on thematic apperceptive techniques. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(3), 225–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1244066
- Jenkins, S. R. (Ed.). (2008). A Handbook of Clinical Scoring Systems for Thematic Apperceptive Techniques. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (Taylor & Francis).
- Kleinpeter, C. H., & Hohman, M. M. (2000). Surrogate motherhood: Personality Traits and satisfaction with service providers. Psychological Reports, 87(3 Pt 1), 957–970. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2000.87.3.957
- Klock, S. C., & Covington, S. N. (2015). Results of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 among gestational surrogacy candidates. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 130(3), 257–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.03.030
- Morey, L. C. (1991). The personality assessment inventory (PAI) professional manual, 2nd Edition. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
- Morgan, C. D., & Murray, H. A. (1935). A method for investigating fantasies: The thematic apperception test. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 34(2), 289–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurpsyc.1935.02250200049005
- Ornduff, S. (2008). Scoring manual for reuben fine’s scoring scheme for the TAT and other verbal projectives. In S.R. Jenkins (Ed.), A Handbook of Clinical Scoring Systems for Thematic Apperceptive Techniques (pp. 271–292). Taylor and Francis Group.
- Parker, P. J. (1983). Motivation of surrogate mothers: initial findings. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 140(1), 117–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.140.1.117
- Purewal, S., & van den Akker, O. B. A. (2009). Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences. Human Reproduction Update, 15(5), 499–515. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmp018
- Ronan, G. F., & Gibbs, M. S. (2008). Scoring manual for personal problem-solving system – revised. In S.R. Jenkins (Ed.), A Handbook of Clinical Scoring Systems for Thematic Apperceptive Techniques (pp.209–227). Taylor and Francis Group.
- Rosenzweig, S., & Fleming, E. E. (1949). Apperceptive norms for the thematic apperception test. Journal of Personality, 17(4), 483–503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01226.x
- Siefert, C., Stein, M., Slavin-Mulford, J., Sinclair, S., Haggerty, G., & Blais, M. (2016). Estimating the effects of thematic apperception test card content on SCORS-G ratings: Replication with a nonclinical sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(6), 598–607. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1167696
- Simpson, T. H., & Hanafin, H. (2015). Counseling Surrogate Carrier Participants In S.N. Covington (Ed), Fertility Counseling: Clinical Guide and Case Studies (pp. 122–135). Cambridge University Press.
- Sims, J. A., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Chen, S. H., & Pascale, C. (2013). Psychometric properties and norms for the personality assessment Inventory in egg donors and gestational carriers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(5), 495–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.775137
- Stein, M. B., Slavin-Mulford, J., Siefert, C. J., Sinclair, S. J., Renna, M., Malone, J., Bello, I., & Blais, M. A. (2014). SCORS-G stimulus characteristics of select Thematic Apperception Test Cards. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(3), 339–349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.823440
- Teglasi, H. (2013). The scientific status of projective techniques as performance measures of personality. In D.H. Saklofske, C. R. Reynolds, & V. L. Schwean (Eds), The Oxford handbook of child psychological assessment (pp. 113–128). Oxford University Press.
- van den Akker, O. (2003). Genetic and gestational surrogate mothers’ experience of surrogacy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 21(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0264683031000124091
- van den Akker, O. (2007). Psychosocial aspects of surrogate motherhood. Human Reproduction Update, 13(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dml039