Pregnancy and birth outcomes of single versus multiple embryo transfer in gestational surrogacy arrangements: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., Dyer, S., Racowsky, C., Mouzon, J., Sokol, R., Rienzi, L., Sunde, A., Schmidt, L., Cooke, I. D., Simpson, J. L., & van der Poel, S. (2017). The international Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 32(9), 1786–1801. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aittomaki, K., Eroila, H., & Kajanoja, P. (2001). A population-based study of the incidence of Mullerian aplasia in Finland. Fertility and Sterility, 76(3), 624–625. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01963-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2013). Consideration of the gestational carrier: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 99(7), 1838–1841. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., Snelling, J., & Tomlins-Jahnke, H. (2012). The practice of surrogacy in New Zealand. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 52(3), 253–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01419.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armour, K. L. (2012). An overview of surrogacy around the world: trends, questions and ethical issues. Nursing for Women’s Health, 16(3), 231–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-486X.2012.01734.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berend, Z. (2012). The romance of surrogacy. Sociological Forum, 27(4), 913–936. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2012.01362.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, D. (2013). Gay Men and Surrogacy. In A. Goldberg & K. Allen (Eds.), LGBT-Parent Families. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, K., Martindale, E. A., Rustamov, O., & Nysenbaum, A. M. (2009). Surrogate pregnancy: an essential guide for clinicians. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 11(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1576/toag.11.1.49.27468
   Google Scholar
• Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., & Montebruno, P. (2019). Incidence of surrogacy in the USA and Israel and implications on women’s health: a quantitative comparison. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 36(12), 2459–2469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01612-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinsden, P. R. (2003). Gestational surrogacy. Human Reproduction Update, 9(5), 483–491. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmg033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinsden, P. R., Appleton, T. C., Murray, E., Hussein, M., Akagbosu, F., & Marcus, S. F. (2000). Treatment by in vitro fertilisation with surrogacy: experience of one British centre. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.).), 320(7239), 924–929. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7239.924
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burrell, C., & Edozien, L. C. (2014). Surrogacy in modern obstetric practice. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 19(5), 272–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2014.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, U., Horstkamp, B., Wessel, J., Chen, F. C., & Dudenhausen, J. W. (2000). Frequency and significance of preterm delivery in twin pregnancies. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 69(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00223-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabra, R., Alduncin, A., Cabra, J. R., Ek, L. H., Briceno, M., & Mendoza, P. B. (2018). Gestational surrogacy. medical, psychological and legal aspects: 9 years of experience in Mexico. Human Reproduction Open, 2018(1), hox029. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hox029
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Canadian Fertility & Andrology Society. (2016). Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2015 results from the Canadian ART Register (CARTR), November 23, 2016 [Press release]. https://cfas.ca/public-affairs/canadian-art-register/
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Fertility & Andrology Society. (n.d.). CARTR annual reports. https://cfas.ca/cartr-annual-reports/
   Google Scholar
• Cassell, K. A., O’Connell, C. M., & Baskett, T. F. (2004). The origins and outcomes of triplet and quadruplet pregnancies in Nova Scotia: 1980 to 2001. American Journal of Perinatology, 21(8), 439–445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-835960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). ART and gestational carriers. https://www.cdc.gov/art/key-findings/gestational-carriers.html
   Google Scholar
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Single embryo transfer. https://www.cdc.gov/art/patientresources/transfer.html
   Google Scholar
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). ART success rates. https://www.cdc.gov/art/artdata/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Coates, A., Bankowski, B. J., Kung, A., Griffin, D. K., & Munne, S. (2017). Differences in pregnancy outcomes in donor egg frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles following preimplantation genetic screening (PGS): A single center retrospective study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 34(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0832-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corson, S. L., Kelly, M., Braverman, A. M., & English, M. E. (1998). Gestational carrier pregnancy. Fertility and Sterility, 69(4), 670–674. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00020-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dar, S., Lazer, T., Swanson, S., Silverman, J., Wasser, C., Moskovtsev, S. I., Sojecki, A., & Librach, C. L. (2015). Assisted reproduction involving gestational surrogacy: an analysis of the medical, psychosocial and legal issues: experience from a large surrogacy program. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 30(2), 345–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, D. A., Nulsen, J. C., Maier, D. B., Engmann, L., Schmidt, D., & Benadiva, C. A. (2005). Obstetrical complications in gestational carrier pregnancies. Fertility and Sterility, 83(3), 749–754. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. (2018). Publications and reports. https://www.eshre.eu/Data-collection-and-research/Consortia/EIM/Publications.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Expert Panel on Infertility and Adoption. (2009). Raising expectations. Toronto, ON: Ontario Government.
   Google Scholar
• Ezugwu, E., & Van der Burg, S. (2015). Debating elective single embryo transfer after in vitro fertilization: A plea for a context-sensitive approach. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.149761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farquhar, C., Bhattacharya, S., Repping, S., Mastenbroek, S., Kamath, M. S., Marjoribanks, J., & Boivin, J. (2019). Female subfertility. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers, 5(1), 7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-018-0058-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitzgerald, O., Paul, R. C., Harris, K., Chambers, G. M. (2018). Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand 2016. https://npesu.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/npesu/data_collection
   Google Scholar
• Frydman, R. (2016). Surrogacy: yes or no? Fertility and Sterility, 105(6), 1445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfarb, J. M., Austin, C., Peskin, B., Lisbona, H., Desai, N., & de Mola, J. R. (2000). Fifteen years experience with an in-vitro fertilization surrogate gestational pregnancy programme. Human Reproduction, 15(5), 1075–1078. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.5.1075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarberg, K., Stafford-Bell, M.A., & Everingham, S. G. (2015). Intended parents’ motivations and information and support needs when seeking extraterritorial compensated surrogacy. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 31(5), 689–696. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbottle, S., Hughes, C., Cutting, R., Roberts, S., & Brison, D, On Behalf Of The Association Of Clinical Embryologists, & The (ACE) British Fertility Society (BFS). (2015). Elective single embryo transfer: An update to UK best practice guidelines. Human Fertility : Journal of the British Fertility Society, 18(3), 165–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/14647273.2015.1083144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havins, W. E., & Dalessio, J. J. (2000). Reproductive surrogacy at the millennium: proposed model legislation regulating non-traditional gestational surrogacy contracts. McGeorge Law Review, 31(3), 673–702.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hibino, Y., & Shimazono, Y. (2013). Becoming a surrogate online: “message board”. Asian Bioethics Review, 5(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/asb.2013.0004
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority. (n.d.). Publications. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/about-us/publications#ar
   Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., Murray, C., Lycett, E., MacCallum, F., & Golombok, S. (2003). Surrogacy: The experiences of surrogate mothers. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 18(10), 2196–2204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkey, A. M. (2003). Redefining motherhood: Determining legal maternity in gestational surrogacy arrangements. Drake Law Review, 51(3), 605–632.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindenman, E., Shepard, M. K., & Pescovitz, O. H. (1997). Mullerian agenesis: An update. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 90(2), 307–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00256-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López Regalado, M. L., Clavero, A., Gonzalvo, M. C., Serrano, M., Martínez, L., Mozas, J., Rodríguez-Serrano, F., Fontes, J., Romero, B., & Castilla, J. A. (2014). Cumulative live birth rate after two single frozen embryo transfers (eSFET) versus a double frozen embryo transfer (DFET) with cleavage stage embryos: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 31(12), 1621–1627. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0346-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLernon, D. J., Harrild, K., Bergh, C., Davies, M. J., de Neubourg, D., Dumoulin, J. C., Gerris, J., Kremer, J. A., Martikainen, H., Mol, B. W., Norman, R. J., Thurin-Kjellberg, A., Tiitinen, A., van Montfoort, A. P., van Peperstraten, A. M., Van Royen, E., & Bhattacharya, S. (2010). Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 341, c6945. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c6945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza, R., Jáuregui, T., Diaz-Nuñez, M., de la Sota, M., Hidalgo, A., Ferrando, M., Martínez-Indart, L., Expósito, A., & Matorra, R. (2018). Infertile couples prefer twins: Analysis of their reasons and clinical characteristics related to this preference. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility, 19(3), 167–173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milliez, J. (2008). Surrogacy. FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 102(3), 312–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.04.016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Min, J. K., Hughes, E., & Young, D, Joint SOGC-CFAS Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee; Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Committee. (2010). Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada : JOGC  =  Journal D'obstetrique et Gynecologie du Canada : JOGC, 32(4), 363–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34482-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit (NPESU). (2018, March 12). Australian & New Zealand Assisted Reproduction Database (ANZARD). https://npesu.unsw.edu.au/data-collection/australian-new-zealand-assisted-reproduction-database-anzard
   Google Scholar
• Newswire.com. (2017, November 9). CFC single embryo transfer policy brings multiple pregnancy lower than national standard. Newswire.com.
   Google Scholar
• Obiechina, N. J., Okolie, V. E., Eleje, G. U., Okechukwu, Z. C., & Anemeje, O. A. (2011). Twin versus singleton pregnancies: The incidence, pregnancy complications, and obstetric outcomes in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. International Journal of Women’s Health, 3, 227–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S22059
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oultram, S. (2015). One mum too few: Maternal status in host surrogate motherhood arrangements. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(6), 470–473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., Tran, C., Tan, T., Nelson, J., Batzofin, J., & Serafini, P. (1999). Perinatal outcome after in-vitro fertilization-surrogacy. Human Reproduction, 14(3), 671–676. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.3.671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, K. M., Boulet, S. L., Jamieson, D. J., & Kissin, D. M, National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System (NASS) Group. (2016). Trends and outcomes of gestational surrogacy in the United States. Fertility and Sterility, 106(2), 435–442. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, K. M., Boulet, S. L., Levine, A. D., Jamieson, D. J., & Kissin, D. M. (2018). Differences in the utilization of gestational surrogacy between states in the U.S. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 5, 1–4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2017.08.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pingili, R., Bamigboye, V., & Jegede, K. (2007). Multiple pregnancy: A blessing or a curse? The Internet Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 9(2), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Price, F. (1989). Establishing guidelines: Regulations and the clinical management of infertility. In R. Lee & D. Morgan (Eds.), Birthrights: Law and Ethics at the Beginning of Life (pp. 42). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reproductive Technology Accreditation Committee. (2017). Code of practice for assisted reproductive technology units. Fertility Society of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, A., Beltsos, A., Jasulaitis, S., Kaplan, B., Wagner-Coughlin, C., & Liebermann, J. (2014). Elective single versus double blastocyst transfers in gestational carriers using fresh anonymous donor oocytes. Fertility and Sterility, 102(3), e340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudrappa, S., & Collins, C. (2015). Altruistic agencies and compassionate consumers. Gender & Society, 29(6), 937–959. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215602922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanan, S. (2013). An ethnomethodological approach to examine exploitation in the context of capacity, trust and experience of commercial surrogacy in India. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine : PEHM, 8(3), 10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-8-10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serafini, P. (2001). Outcome and follow-up of children born after IVF-surrogacy. Human Reproduction Update, 7(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/7.1.23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayestefar, M., & Abedi, H. (2017). Leading factors to surrogacy from pregnant surrogate on the health of reproduction mothers’ vantage point: A qualitative research. International Journal of Women’s Health and Reproduction Sciences, 5(2), 97–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2017.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenfield, F., Pennings, G., Cohen, J., Devroey, P., de Wert, G., & Tarlatzis, B., ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law (2005). ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 10: surrogacy. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 20(10), 2705–2707. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singha, S. (2016). Surrogate woman: Ethnography of biomedical imaging practices in Thailand. Journal of Language and Culture, 35, 141–165. Thai language. https://www.academia.edu/13102169/Surrogate_Woman_Ethnography_of_Biomedical_Imaging_practices_in_Thailand_by_Sumonmarn_Singha
   Google Scholar
• Siristatidis, C., & Hamilton, M. (2007). Single embryo transfer. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, 17(6), 192–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2007.04.005
   Google Scholar
• Söderström-Anttila, V., Blomqvist, T., Foudila, T., Hippelainen, M., Kurunmaki, H., Siegberg, R., Tulppala, M., Tuomi-Nikula, M., Vilska, S., & Hovatta, O. (2002). Experience of in vitro fertilization surrogacy in Finland. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 81(8), 747–752. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1600-0412.2002.810811.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström-Anttila, V., Wennerholm, U., Loft, A., Pinborg, A., Aittomaki, K., Romundstad, V., & Bergh, C. (2016). Surrogacy: Outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families – A systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 22(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford-Bell, M.A., S.G., Everingham, & Hammarberg, K. (2014). Outcomes of surrogacy undertaken by Australians overseas. The Medical Journal of Australia, 201(6), 330–333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5694/mja14.01086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taebi, M. (2014). Behind the scenes of surrogacy. Nursing and Midwifery Studies, 3(4), e23600. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17795/nmsjournal23600
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanderup, M., Reddy, S., Patel, T., & Nielsen, B. B. (2015). Informed consent in medical decision-making in commercial gestational surrogacy: A mixed methods study in New Delhi, India. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 94(5), 465–472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannus, S., Gilman, A., Younes, G., Son, W., Shavit, T., & Dahan, M. (2016). Cumulative live birth rate after fresh elective single blastocyst transfer and subsequent frozen single blastocyst transfer compared to initial fresh double blastocysts transfer in women aged 40-43. Fertility and Sterility, 106(3), e87–e88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zyl, L., & Walker, R. (2013). Beyond altruistic and commercial contract motherhood: the professional model. Bioethics, 27(7), 373–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01962.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, A. Y., Dill, S. K., Bowman, M., & Sullivan, E. A. (2016). Gestational surrogacy in Australia 2004-2011: Treatment, pregnancy and birth outcomes. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 56(3), 255–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, P. M. (2016). Hidden from view: Canadian gestational surrogacy practices and outcomes, 2001–2012. Reproductive Health Matters, 24(47), 205–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2016.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, P. M. (2017). “One for Sorrow, Two for Joy?”: American embryo transfer guideline recommendations, practices, and outcomes for gestational surrogate patients. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 34(4), 431–443. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-0885-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, P. M. (2018). Commercialization, altruism, clinical practice: seeking explanation for similarities and differences in Californian and Canadian gestational surrogacy outcomes. Women’s Health Issues : Official Publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health, 28(3), 239–250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2018.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, I., Hindoyan, R., Landay, M., Ho, J., Ingles, S. A., McGinnis, L. K., Paulson, R. J., & Chung, K. (2017). Perinatal outcomes after natural conception versus in vitro fertilization (IVF) in gestational surrogates: a model to evaluate IVF treatment versus maternal effects. Fertility and Sterility, 108(6), 993–998. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2018, February 19). Preterm birth. http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth
   Google Scholar
• www.covidence.org. (2018). Covidence systematic review management. Retrieved from https://www.covidence.org
   Google Scholar