Cumulative live birth rates among gestational surrogates in altruistic surrogacy arrangements

References

• Abuzeid, M. I., Bolonduro, O., Chance, J. L., Abozaid, T., Urich, M., Ullah, M., Ali, T., Ashraf, M., & Khan, I. (2014). Cumulative live birth rate and assisted reproduction: Impact of female age and transfer day. Facts, Views & Vision in Obgyn, 6(3), 145–149. https://www.fvvo.be/archive/volume-6/number-3/facts/cumulative-live-birth-rate-and-assisted-reproduction-impact-of-female-age-and-transfer-day/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson, L., Snelling, J., & Tomlins-Jahnke, H. (2012). The practice of surrogacy in New Zealand. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 52(3), 253–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01419.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armour, K. L. (2012). An overview of surrogacy around the world: Trends, questions and ethical issues. Nursing for Women's Health, 16(3), 231–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-486X.2012.01734.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2019, March). Australian demographic statistics. Australian Bureau of Statistics. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/3101.0
   Google Scholar
• Australian Capital Territory Parliamentary Counsel. (2004). Parentage Act 2004. Australian Capital Territory, The ACT Parliamentary Counsel. www.legislation.act.gov.au › current › PDF › 2004-1
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. D., Cai, T. T., & DasGupta, A. (2001). Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Statistical Science, 16(2), 101–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1009213286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, C., & Edozien, L. C. (2014). Surrogacy in modern obstetric practice. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 19(5), 272–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2014.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, G. M., Paul, R. C., Harris, K., Fitzgerald, O., Boothroyd, C. V., Rombauts, L., Chapman, M. G., & Jorm, L. (2017). Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand: Cumulative live birth rates as measures of success. Medical Journal of Australia, 207(3), 114–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.01435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clua, E., Tur, R., Coroleu, B., Boada, M., Rodríguez, I., Barri, P. N., & Veiga, A. (2012). Elective single-embryo transfer in oocyte donation programmes: Should it be the rule? Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 25(6), 642–648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, A., Bankowski, B. J., Kung, A., Griffin, D. K., & Munne, S. (2017). Differences in pregnancy outcomes in donor egg frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles following preimplantation genetic screening (PGS): A single center retrospective study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 34(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0832-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. (2014). How old is too old for surrogate motherhood? https://www.familyformation.com/how-old-is-too-old-for-surrogate-motherhood/
   Google Scholar
• De Neubourg, D., Bogaerts, K., Blockeel, C., Coetsier, T., Delvigne, A., Devreker, K., Dubois, M., Gillain, N., Gordts, S., & Wyns, C. (2016). How do cumulative live birth rates and cumulative multiple live birth rates over complete courses of assisted reproductive technology treatment per woman compare among registries? Human Reproduction, 31(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, N., Hill, M. J., Caswell, W., Lim, J., Tucker, M. J., Stratton, M. O., Graham, J., DeCherney, A. H., Devine, K., Hayes, H. L., Levy, M., & Doyle, J. (2017). Association between the number of retrieved mature donor oocytes and live birth in IVF donor recipient cycles using frozen donor eggs. Fertility and Sterility, 108(3), e228–e229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2013). Consideration of the gestational carrier: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 99(7), 1838–1841. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, O., Paul, R. C., Harris, K., & Chambers, G. M. (2018). Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand 2016. https://npesu.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/npesu/surveillances/Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technology%20in%20Australia%20and%20New%20Zealand%202016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gameiro, S., Boivin, J., Peronace, L., & Verhaak, C. M. (2012). Why do patients discontinue fertility treatment? A systematic review of reasons and predictors of discontinuation in fertility treatment. Human Reproduction Update, 18(6), 652–669. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Western Australian. (2008). Surrogacy Act 2008 No. 47 of 2008. The Parliament of Western Australia. www.legislation.wa.gov.au > statutes.nsf
   Google Scholar
• Hammarberg, K., Johnson, L., & Petrillo, T. (2011). Gamete and embryo donation and surrogacy in Australia: The social context and regulatory framework. International Journal of Fertility & Sterility, 4(4), 176–183. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24851179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibino, Y., & Shimazono, Y. (2013). Becoming a surrogate online: Message board. Asian Bioethics Review, 5(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/asb.2013.0004
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, R. G., Wang, A. Y., Li, Z., Hammarberg, K., Johnson, L., Mol, B. W., & Sullivan, E. A. (2019). Oocyte donor age has a significant impact on oocyte recipients' cumulative live-birth rate: A population-based cohort study. Fertility and Sterility, 112(4), 724–730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology, Adamson, G. D., de Mouzon, J., Lancaster, P., Nygren, K.-G., Sullivan, E., & Zegers-Hochschild, F. (2006). World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization, 2000. Fertility and Sterility, 85(6), 1586–1622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Wang, A. Y., Bowman, M., Hammarberg, K., Farquhar, C., Johnson, L., Safi, N., & Sullivan, E. A. (2018). ICSI does not increase the cumulative live birth rate in non-male factor infertility. Human Reproduction, 33(7), 1322–1330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, B., Brown, M. B., Wantman, E., Lederman, A., Gibbons, W., Schattman, G. L., Lobo, R. A., Leach, R. E., & Stern, J. E. (2012). Cumulative birth rates with linked assisted reproductive technology cycles. The New England Journal of Medicine, 366(26), 2483–2491. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1110238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari, A., McLernon, D., & Bhattacharya, S. (2015). Cumulative live birth rate: Time for a consensus? Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 30(12), 2703–2707. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malizia, B. A., Hacker, M. R., & Penzias, A. S. (2009). Cumulative live-birth rates after in vitro fertilization. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(3), 236–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0803072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLernon, D. J., Maheshwari, A., Lee, A. J., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016). Cumulative live birth rates after one or more complete cycles of IVF: A population-based study of linked cycle data from 178,898 women. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 31(3), 572–581. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New South Wales Parliament. (2010). Surrogacy Act 2010. New South Wales Parliament. https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/act/2010/102
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. E., Fitzgerald, O., Paul, R. C., & Chambers, G. M. (2019). Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand 2017. https://npesu.unsw.edu.au/data-collection/australian-new-zealand-assisted-reproduction-database-anzard
   Google Scholar
• Paulson, R. J. (2014). Does the age of the recipient influence the probability of pregnancy among recipients of oocyte donation? Fertility and Sterility, 101(5), 1248–1249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulson, R. J., Hatch, I. E., Lobo, R. A., & Sauer, M. V. (1997). Cumulative conception and live birth rates after oocyte donation: Implications regarding endometrial receptivity. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 12(4), 835–839. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.4.835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, K. M., Boulet, S. L., Jamieson, D. J., Kissin, D. M., & National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System (NASS) Group. (2016). Trends and outcomes of gestational surrogacy in the United States. Fertility and Sterility, 106(2), 435–442. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouly, J. L., Ouziel, L., Gremeau, A. S., De Mouzon, J., Janny, L., Vignancour, S., Dejou, L., & Brugnon, F. (2012). Analyse des facteurs influençant les taux cumulatifs d’accouchement en AMP sur une cohorte de 1001 couplesFactors affecting the cumulative live birth rate in IVF cycles. Retrospective analysis of a 1001 couples cohort [Factors affecting the cumulative live birth rate in IVF cycles. Retrospective analysis of a 1001 couples cohort]. Gynecologie, Obstetrique & Fertilite, 40(4), 219–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2012.01.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Queensland Government. (2012). Surrogacy Act 2010. QLD Parliamentary Counsel. https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-2010-002
   Google Scholar
• Raz, N., Shalev, A., Horowitz, E., Weissman, A., Mizrachi, Y., Herman, H. G., & Raziel, A. (2018). Cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates through assisted reproduction in women 44-45 years of age: Is there any hope? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 35(3), 441–447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1094-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reproductive Technology Accreditation Committee, Fertility Society of Australia. (2017). Code of practice for assisted reproductive technology units. www.fertilitysociety.com.au › RTAC-COP-Final-20141
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, A., Beltsos, A., Jasulaitis, S., Kaplan, B., Wagner-Coughlin, C., & Liebermann, J. (2014). Elective single versus double blastocyst transfers in gestational carriers using fresh anonymous donor oocytes. Fertility and Sterility, 102(3), e340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattaburuth, A. (2015, February 21). Surrogacy bill receives house seal of approval. Bamgkok Post. https://www.pressreader.com/thailand/bangkok-post/20150221/281517929563868
   Google Scholar
• Singha, S. (2016). ผู้หญิงอุ้มบุญ: ชาติพันธุ์วรรณนาของปฏิบัติการสร้าง " ภาพลักษณ์ " ของชีวการแพทย์ในประเทศไทย [Surrogate woman: Ethnography of biomedical imaging practices in Thailand]. Journal of Language and Culture, 35, 141–165. (Thai language). https://www.academia.edu/13102169/Surrogate_Woman_Ethnography_of_Biomedical_Imaging_practices_in_Thailand_by_Sumonmarn_Singha_%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B8%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%A2_%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%B0_
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. D. A. C., Tilling, K., Nelson, S. M., & Lawlor, D. A. (2015). Live-birth rate associated with repeat in vitro fertilisation treatment cycles. JAMA, 314(24), 2654–2662. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.17296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström-Anttila, V., Wennerholm, U., Loft, A., Pinborg, A., Aittomaki, K., Romundstad, V., & Bergh, C. (2016). Surrogacy: Outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families-a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 22(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasmania Government. (2015). Surrogacy Act 2012. Tasmania Government. https://www.legislation.tas.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-2012-034#GS10@EN
   Google Scholar
• Tigges, J., Godehardt, E., Soepenberg, T., Maxrath, B., Friol, K., & Gnoth, C. (2016). Determinants of cumulative ART live-birth rates in a single-center study: Age, fertilization modality, and first-cycle outcome. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 294(5), 1081–1089. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4162-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zyl, L., & Walker, R. (2013). Beyond altruistic and commercial contract motherhood: The professional model. Bioethics, 27(7), 373–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01962.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VARTA. (2015). Victorian assisted reproductive treatment authority annual report. VARTA. https://www.varta.org.au/
   Google Scholar
• VARTA. (2019). About VARTA. VARTA. https://www.varta.org.au/
   Google Scholar
• Victorian State Government. (2008). Assisted Reproductive Treatment Act 2008 No. 76 of 2008. The Parliament of Victoria. www.parliament.vic.gov.au› 13611-2008 ciassreproduction
   Google Scholar
• Wang, A. Y., Dill, S. K., Bowman, M., & Sullivan, E. A. (2016). Gestational surrogacy in Australia 2004-2011: Treatment, pregnancy and birth outcomes. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 56(3), 255–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. A., Farquhar, C., & Sullivan, E. A. (2012). Donor age is a major determinant of success of oocyte donation/recipient programme. Human Reproduction, 27(1), 118–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witsenburg, C., Dieben, S., Van der Westerlaken, L., Verburg, H., & Naaktgeboren, N. (2005). Cumulative live birth rates in cohorts of patients treated with in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertility and Sterility, 84(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, J. S., Steward, R. G., Dude, A. M., Shah, A., Goldfarb, J. M., & Muasher, S. J. (2014). Pregnancy rates in donor oocyte cycles compared to similar autologous in vitro fertilization cycles: An analysis of 26,457 fresh cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Fertility and Sterility, 102(2), 399–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., Dyer, S., Racowsky, C., de Mouzon, J., Sokol, R., Rienzi, L., Sunde, A., Schmidt, L., Cooke, I. D., Simpson, J. L., & van der Poel, S. (2017). The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Fertility and Sterility, 108(3), 393–406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar