Oocyte yield in social, medical and donor oocyte cryopreservation cycles

References

• Al-Azemi, M., Killick, S. R., Duffy, S., Pye, C., Refaat, B., Hill, N., & Ledger, W. (2011). Multi-marker assessment of ovarian reserve predicts oocyte yield after ovulation induction. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 26(2), 414–422. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borini, A., Levi Setti, P. E., Anserini, P., De Luca, R., De Santis, L., Porcu, E., La Sala, G. B., Ferraretti, A., Bartolotti, T., Coticchio, G., & Scaravelli, G. (2010). Multicenter observational study on slow-cooling oocyte cryopreservation: clinical outcome. Fertility and Sterility, 94(5), 1662–1668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakmak, H., & Rosen, M. P. (2015). Random-start ovarian stimulation in patients with cancer. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 27(3), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cil, A. P., Bang, H., & Oktay, K. (2013). Age-specific probability of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 100(2), 492–499.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo, A., García-Velasco, J. A., Coello, A., Domingo, J., Pellicer, A., & Remohí, J. (2016). Oocyte vitrification as an efficient option for elective fertility preservation. Fertility and Sterility, 105(3), 755–764.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo, A., Garrido, N., Pellicer, A., & Remohí, J. (2015). Six years' experience in ovum donation using vitrified oocytes: report of cumulative outcomes, impact of storage time, and development of a predictive model for oocyte survival rate. Fertility and Sterility, 104(6), 1426–1434.e348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, S., Boulet, S. L., Kawwass, J. F., Jamieson, D. J., & Kissin, D. M. (2017). Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013. Fertility and Sterility, 107(1), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2015). Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Lancet (London, England), 386(10001), 1341–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61074-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürtin, Z. B., Morgan, L., O'Rourke, D., Wang, J., & Ahuja, K. (2019). For whom the egg thaws: insights from an analysis of 10 years of frozen egg thaw data from two UK clinics, 2008-2017. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 36(6), 1069–1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01429-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C., Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., & Patrizio, P. (2017). Medical egg freezing and cancer patients' hopes: Fertility preservation at the intersection of life and death. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 195, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. P., Kasaven, L., L'Heveder, A., Jalmbrant, M., Green, J., Makki, M., Odia, R., Norris, G., Bracewell Milnes, T., Saso, S., Serhal, P., & Ben Nagi, J. (2020). Perceptions, outcomes, and regret following social egg freezing in the UK; a cross-sectional survey. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 99(3), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. P., Saso, S., Mania, A., Smith, J. R., Serhal, P., & Ben Nagi, J. (2018). The dawn of a new ice age: social egg freezing. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 97(6), 641–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. P., Serhal, P., & Ben Nagi, J. (2018a). Social egg freezing: Early is not always best. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 97(12), 1531 https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. P., Serhal, P., & Ben-Nagi, J. (2018b). Social egg freezing should be offered to single women approaching their late thirties: FOR: Women should not suffer involuntary childlessness because they have not yet found a partner. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 125(12), 1579–1579. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupesic, S., Kurjak, A., Bjelos, D., & Vujisic, S. (2003). Three-dimensional ultrasonographic ovarian measurements and in vitro fertilization outcome are related to age. Fertility and Sterility, 79(1), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04567-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwayama, M. (2007). Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the Cryotop method. Theriogenology, 67(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumder, K., Gelbaya, T. A., Laing, I., & Nardo, L. G. (2010). The use of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count to predict the potential of oocytes and embryos. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 150(2), 166–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinelli, L., Busatta, L., Galvagni, L., & Piciocchi, C. (2015). Social egg freezing: a reproductive chance or smoke and mirrors? Croatian Medical Journal, 56(4), 387–391. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2015.56.387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meczekalski, B., Czyzyk, A., Kunicki, M., Podfigurna-Stopa, A., Plociennik, L., Jakiel, G., Maciejewska-Jeske, M., & Lukaszuk, K. (2016). Fertility in women of late reproductive age: the role of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in its assessment. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, 39(11), 1259–1265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-016-0497-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo, M. A., Garrido, N., Alvarez, C., Bellver, J., Meseguer, M., Pellicer, A., & Remohí, J. (2009). Antral follicle count (AFC) can be used in the prediction of ovarian response but cannot predict the oocyte/embryo quality or the in vitro fertilization outcome in an egg donation program. Fertility and Sterility, 91(1), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesen, T. B., Mersereau, J. E., Kane, J. B., & Steiner, A. Z. (2015). Optimal timing for elective egg freezing. Fertility and Sterility, 103(6), 1551–1556.e64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau, J., Gatimel, N., Simon, C., Cohade, C., Lesourd, F., Parinaud, J., & Léandri, R. (2019). Age-specific anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels poorly affects cumulative live birth rate after intra-uterine insemination. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X, 3, 100043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100043
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nardo, L. G., Christodoulou, D., Gould, D., Roberts, S. A., Fitzgerald, C. T., & Laing, I. (2007). Anti-Müllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count in women enrolled in in vitro fertilization cycles: relationship to lifestyle factors, chronological age and reproductive history. Gynecological Endocrinology, 23(8), 486–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590701532815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoletti, C., & Tanturri, M. (2008). Differences in delaying motherhood across European countries: Empirical evidence from the ECHP. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie, 24(2), 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-008-9161-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña, J. E., Chang, P. L., Chan, L. K., Zeitoun, K., Thornton, M. H., 2nd,., & Sauer, M. V. (2002). Supraphysiological estradiol levels do not affect oocyte and embryo quality in oocyte donation cycles. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 17(1), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.1.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, N., Voskuilen-Gonzalez, A., Hancock, K., Lekovich, J. P., Schattman, G. L., & Rosenwaks, Z. (2017). Random-start ovarian stimulation in women desiring elective cryopreservation of oocytes. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 35(4), 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petropanagos, A. (2010). Reproductive 'choice' and egg freezing. Cancer Treatment and Research, 156, 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6518-9_17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2013). Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy or gonadectomy: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 100(5), 1214–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, R. J., Reid, G. D., Koch, J., Deans, R., Ledger, W. L., Friedlander, M., Gilchrist, R. B., Walters, K. A., & Abbott, J. A. (2017). The safety and efficacy of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for fertility preservation in women with early breast cancer: a systematic review. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 32(5), 1033–1045. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. D., Serafini, P. C., Fioravanti, J., Yadid, I., Coslovsky, M., Hassun, P., Alegretti, J. R., & Motta, E. L. (2010). Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification. Fertility and Sterility, 94(6), 2088–2095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, W. Y., Sun, Y. P., Jin, H. X., Xin, Z. M., Su, Y. C., Guo, Y. H., & Chen, Z. J. (2010). [Effects of cryopreservation time and thawing method of human oocyte vitrification on the outcome of assisted reproduction]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, 45(8), 578–582. https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0529-567X.2010.08.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaughan, D. A., Harrity, C., Sills, E. S., & Mocanu, E. V. (2016). Serum estradiol:oocyte ratio as a predictor of reproductive outcome: an analysis of data from >9000 IVF cycles in the Republic of Ireland. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33(4), 481–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0664-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Wolff, M., Bruckner, T., Strowitzki, T., & Germeyer, A. (2018). Fertility preservation: ovarian response to freeze oocytes is not affected by different malignant diseases-an analysis of 992 stimulations. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 35(9), 1713–1719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1227-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrontikis, A., Chang, P. L., Kovacs, P., & Lindheim, S. R. (2010). Antral follice counts (AFC) predict ovarian response and pregnancy outcomes in oocyte donation cycles. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 27(7), 383–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9421-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirleitner, B., Okhowat, J., Vištejnová, L., Králíčková, M., Karlíková, M., Vanderzwalmen, P., Ectors, F., Hradecký, L., Schuff, M., & Murtinger, M. (2018). Relationship between follicular volume and oocyte competence, blastocyst development and live-birth rate: optimal follicle size for oocyte retrieval. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 51(1), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittemer, C., Ohl, J., Bailly, M., Bettahar-Lebugle, K., & Nisand, I. (2000). Does body mass index of infertile women have an impact on IVF procedure and outcome? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 17(10), 547–552. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026477628723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. J., Feret, M., Chang, L., Yang, M., & Merhi, Z. (2015). Obesity adversely impacts the number and maturity of oocytes in conventional IVF not in minimal stimulation IVF. Gynecological Endocrinology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology, 31(5), 409–413. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2015.1014785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar