Meeting multiple same-donor offspring: psychosocial challenges

References

• Blyth, E. (2012). Discovering the ‘facts of life’ following anonymous donor insemination. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 26(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebs006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeije, H. (2005). Analyseren in kwalitatief onderzoek. Boom uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, S. H., Notermans, C., van Brouwershaven, A., Maas, A. J. B. M., & Indekeu, A. (in progress). The work of kinship”: Dilemma’s and strategies of donor half-siblings in the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (2007). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830030103
   Google Scholar
• Carsten, J. (2000). Knowing where you’ve come from’: Ruptures and continuities of time and kinship in narratives of adoption reunions. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6(4), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossar, J., & Neil, E. (2013). Making sense of siblings: connections and severances in post-adoption contact. Child & Family Social Work, 18(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M. (2002). Lessons from a recent adoption study to identify some of the service needs of, and issues for, donor offspring wanting to know about their donors. Human Fertility (Cambridge, England), 5(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464727992000199691
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crawshaw, M. A., Blyth, E. D., & Daniels, K. D. (2007). Past semen donors' views about the use of a voluntary contact register. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 14(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60886-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., Daniels, K., Adams, D., Bourne, K., van Hooff, J. A. P., Kramer, W., Pasch, L., & Thorn, P. (2015). Emerging models for facilitating contact between people genetically related through donor conception: a preliminary analysis and discussion. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 1(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2015.10.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Culley, L., Hudson, N., & Lohan, M. (2013). Where are all the men? The marginalization of men in social scientific research on infertility. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 27(3), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K. R., Kramer, W., & Perez-y-Perez, M. V. (2012). Semen donors who are open to contact with their offspring: issues and implications for them and their families. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 25(7), 670–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feast, J. (2003). Using and not losing the messages from the adoption experience for donor-assisted conception. Human Fertility (Cambridge, England), 6(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464770312331368983
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fiom. https://fiom.nl/
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, T., Appleby, J. B., & Jadva, V. (2012). Identifiable donors and siblings: implications for the future. In M. Richards, G. Pennings, & J. Appleby (Eds.), Reproductive donation: Practice, policy and bioethics (pp. 250–269). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, T., Bourne, K., Jadva, V., & Smith, V. (2014). Making connections: contact between sperm donor relations. Families, Origins and Identities. In T. Freeman, S. Graham, F. Ebtehaj, & M. Richards (Eds.), Relatedness in assisted reproduction (pp. 270–295). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2009). Gamete donation: parents' experiences of searching for their child's donor siblings and donor. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 24(3), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E., & Scheib, J. E. (2016). Female-partnered women conceiving kinship: Does sharing a sperm donor mean we are family? Journal of Lesbian Studies, 20(3–4), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2016.1089382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greif, G. L., & Woolley, M. E. (2015). Adult sibling relationships. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grotevant, H. D. (2009). Emotional distance regulation over the life course in adoptive kinship networks. In G. M. Wrobel & E. Neil (Eds.), International Advances in Adoption Research for Practice (pp. 295–316). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hertz, R., & Mattes, J. (2011). Donor-shared siblings or genetic strangers. Journal of Family Issues, 32(9), 1129–1155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X11404345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz, R., & Nelson, M. K. (2019). Random families: Genetic strangers, sperm donor siblings, and the creation of new kin. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hertz, R., Nelson, M. K., & Kramer, W. (2017). Donor sibling networks as a vehicle for expanding kinship: A replication and extension. Journal of Family Issues, 38(2), 248–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X16631018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryo Act (2008). Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act § 24, 31ZE Provision of information about donor-conceived genetic siblings (2008). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22/section/24
   Google Scholar
• Infertility Treatment Act (1995). http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/repealed_act/ita1995264/
   Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2010). Experiences of offspring searching for and contacting their donor siblings and donor. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 20(4), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens, P. M., Nap, A. W., & Bancsi, L. F. (2011). Reconsidering the number of offspring per gamete donor in the Dutch open-identity system. Human Fertility (Cambridge, England), 14(2), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.3109/14647273.2011.577886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens, P. M., Thorn, P., Castilla, J. A., Frith, L., Crawshaw, M., Mochtar, M., Bjorndahl, L., Kvist, U., & Kirkman-Brown, J. C. (2015). Evolving minimum standards in responsible international sperm donor offspring quota. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 30(6), 568–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Bourne, K., & Hammarberg, K. (2012). Donor conception legislation in Victoria, Australia: The “Time to Tell” campaign, donor-linking and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19(4), 803–819.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2012). Joining together. Group theory and group skills. 11th ed. Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milevsky, A. (2016). Sibling issues in therapy: Research and practice with children, adolescents and adults. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. K., Hertz, R., & Kramer, W. (2013). Making sense of donors and donor siblings: A comparison of the perceptions of donor-conceived offspring in lesbian-parent and heterosexual-parent families. In P. N. Claster & S. L. Blair (Eds.), Visions of the 21st century family: Transforming structures and identities (pp. 1–42). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• PROGAR (2005). HFEA SEED Review consultation: "Regulation of Donor Assisted Conception" https://www.basw.co.uk/resources/hfea-seed-sperm-egg-and-embryo-donation-review-regulation-donor-assisted-conception-progar
   Google Scholar
• Scheib, J. E., & Ruby, A. (2008). Contact among families who share the same sperm donor. Fertility and Sterility, 90(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheib, J. E., & Ruby, A. (2009). Beyond consanguinity risk: Developing donor birth limits that consider psychosocial risk factors. Fertility and Sterility, 91(5), e12; author reply e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, B. (2001). Offspring [Film]. https://www.idfa.nl/en/film/3b1ac3e6-d12d-4274-8ed1-00ae8b504a86/offspring
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. (vol. 17, pp. 273–285). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R. (2006). What grounded theory is not (editorial). Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar