Simultaneous transfer of one good-quality and one poor-quality cleavage stage embryo does not improve pregnancy outcomes

References

• Achache, H., & Revel, A. (2006). Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation. Human Reproduction Update, 12(6), 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dml004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alikani, M., Cohen, J., Tomkin, G., Garrisi, G. J., Mack, C., & Scott, R. T. (1999). Human embryo fragmentation in vitro and its implications for pregnancy and implantation. Fertility and Sterility, 71(5), 836–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00092-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology (2011). The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Human Reproduction, 26(6), 1270–1283. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der037
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bancsi, L. F., Broekmans, F. J., Mol, B. W., Habbema, J. D., & Te Velde, E. R. (2003). Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 79(5), 1091–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00078-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberet, J., Bruno, C., Valot, E., Antunes-Nunes, C., Jonval, L., Chammas, J., Choux, C., Ginod, P., Sagot, P., Soudry-Faure, A., & Fauque, P. (2019). Can novel early non-invasive biomarkers of embryo quality be identified with time-lapse imaging to predict live birth? Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 34(8), 1439–1449. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruffi, R. L., Mauri, A. L., Petersen, C. G., Nicoletti, A., Pontes, A., Oliveira, J. B., & Franco, J. G. Jr (2009). Single-embryo transfer reduces clinical pregnancy rates and live births in fresh IVF and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) cycles: a meta-analysis. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 7(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-7-36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berkhout, R. P., Vergouw, C. G., van Wely, M., de Melker, A. A., Schats, R., Repping, S., Hamer, G., Mastenbroek, S., & Lambalk, C. B. (2017). The addition of a low-quality embryo as part of a fresh day 3 double embryo transfer does not improve ongoing pregnancy rates. Human Reproduction Open, 2017(3), hox020. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hox020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berkkanoglu, M., & Ozgur, K. (2010). What is the optimum maximal gonadotropin dosage used in microdose flare-up cycles in poor responders? Fertility and Sterility, 94(2), 662–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Canto, M., Coticchio, G., Mignini Renzini, M., De Ponti, E., Novara, P. V., Brambillasca, F., Comi, R., & Fadini, R. (2012). Cleavage kinetics analysis of human embryos predicts development to blastocyst and implantation. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 25(5), 474–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.07.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner, T., Moser, M., Sommergruber, M., & Tews, G. (2003). Selection based on morphological assessment of oocytes and embryos at different stages of preimplantation development: a review. Human Reproduction Update, 9(3), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmg021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Danasouri, I., Sterzik, K., Rinaldi, L., Pacchiarotti, A., DeSanto, M., & Selman, H. (2016). Effect of transferring a morphologically impaired embryo with a good quality embryo on the pregnancy and implantation rates. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 20(3), 394–398. https://www.europeanreview.org/article/10267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wert, W., Pennings, G., Shenfield, G., Devroey, F., Tarlatzis, P., Barri, B., & P., Dondorp, ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law, including (2010). Lifestyle-related factors and access to medically assisted reproduction. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 25(3), 578–583. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faddy, M. J., Gosden, M. D., & Gosden, R. G. (2018). A demographic projection of the contribution of assisted reproductive technologies to world population growth. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 36(4), 455–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galliano, D., Bellver, J., Díaz-García, C., Simón, C., & Pellicer, A. (2015). ART and uterine pathology: how relevant is the maternal side for implantation? Human Reproduction Update, 21(1), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu0477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, D. K., Vella, P., Lane, M., Wagley, L., Schlenker, T., & Schoolcraft, W. B. (1998). Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertility and Sterility, 69(1), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00438-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, T., Koizumi, M., Doshida, M., Toya, M., Sagara, E., Oka, N., Nakajo, Y., Aono, N., Igarashi, H., & Kyono, K. (2017). Efficacy of the endometrial receptivity array for repeated implantation failure in Japan: A retrospective, two-centers study. Reproductive Medicine and Biology, 16(3), 290–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi, P., Kazemi, E., Zhan, Q., Malmsten, J. E., Toschi, M., Zisimopoulos, P., Sigaras, A., Lavery, S., Cooper, L., Hickman, C., Meseguer, M., Rosenwaks, Z., Elemento, O., Zaninovic, N., & Hajirasouliha, I. (2019). Deep learning enables robust assessment and selection of human blastocysts after in vitro fertilization. NPJ Digital Medicine, 2, 21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0096-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, K. C., Huang, F. J., Lin, Y. C., Kung, F. T., Hsieh, C. H., Huang, H. W., Tan, P. H., & Chang, S. Y. (2003). The predictive value of using a combined Z-score and day 3 embryo morphology score in the assessment of embryo survival on day 5. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 18(6), 1299–1306. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Wang, W., Sun, X., Liu, L., Jin, H., Li, M., Witz, C., Williams, D., Griffith, J., Skorupski, J., Haddad, G., & Gill, J. (2012). DNA microarray reveals that high proportions of human blastocysts from women of advanced maternal age are aneuploid and mosaic. Biology of Reproduction, 87(6), 148. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.112.103192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahajan, N. (2015). Endometrial receptivity array: Clinical application. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 8(3), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.165153
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manna, C., Nanni, L., Lumini, A., & Pappalardo, S. (2013). Artificial intelligence techniques for embryo and oocyte classification. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 26(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niinimäki, M., Veleva, Z., & Martikainen, H. (2015). Embryo quality is the main factor affecting cumulative live birth rate after elective single embryo transfer in fresh stimulation cycles. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 194, 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.08.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oron, G., Son, W. Y., Buckett, W., Tulandi, T., & Holzer, H. (2014). The association between embryo quality and perinatal outcome of singletons born after single embryo transfers: a pilot study. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 29(7), 1444–1451. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandian, Z., Marjoribanks, J., Ozturk, O., Serour, G., & Bhattacharya, S, Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group (2013). Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013(7), CD003416. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003416.pub4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts, S. A., McGowan, L., Mark Hirst, W., Vail, A., Rutherford, A., Lieberman, B. A., & Brison, D. R, towardSET Collaboration (2011). Reducing the incidence of twins from IVF treatments: predictive modelling from a retrospective cohort. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 26(3), 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roque, M., Lattes, K., Serra, S., Solà, I., Geber, S., Carreras, R., & Checa, M. A. (2013). Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 99(1), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruangvutilert, P., Delhanty, J. D., Serhal, P., Simopoulou, M., Rodeck, C. H., & Harper, J. C. (2000). FISH analysis on day 5 post-insemination of human arrested and blastocyst stage embryos. Prenatal Diagnosis, 20(7), 552–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0223(200007)20:7<552::aid-pd871>3.0.co;2-f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schober, P., Mascha, E. J., & Vetter, T. R. (2021). Statistics From A (Agreement) to Z (z Score): A Guide to Interpreting Common Measures of Association, Agreement, Diagnostic Accuracy, Effect Size, Heterogeneity, and Reliability in Medical Research. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 133(6), 1633–1641. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., Sun, Y., Hao, C., Zhang, H., Wei, D., Zhang, Y., Zhu, Y., Deng, X., Qi, X., Li, H., Ma, X., Ren, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, D., Wang, B., Liu, F., Wu, Q., Wang, Z., Bai, H., … Chen, Z.-J. (2018). Transfer of Fresh versus Frozen Embryos in Ovulatory Women. The New England Journal of Medicine, 378(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1705334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, J., Kan, A., Hitkari, J., Taylor, B., Tallon, N., Warraich, G., Yuzpe, A., & Nakhuda, G. (2018). The role of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) in patients who have failed euploid embryo transfers. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 35(4), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1112-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Velde, E. R., & Pearson, P. L. (2002). The variability of female reproductive ageing. Human Reproduction Update, 8(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/8.2.141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loendersloot, L., van Wely, M., van der Veen, F., Bossuyt, P., & Repping, S. (2014). Selection of embryos for transfer in IVF: ranking embryos based on their implantation potential using morphological scoring. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 29(2), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura-Juncá, P., Irarrázaval, I., Rolle, A. J., Gutiérrez, J. I., Moreno, R. D., & Santos, M. J. (2015). In vitro fertilization (IVF) in mammals: epigenetic and developmental alterations. Scientific and bioethical implications for IVF in humans. Biological Research, 48, 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-015-0059-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. X., Yap, Y. Y., & Matthews, C. D. (2001). Frozen-thawed embryo transfer: influence of clinical factors on implantation rate and risk of multiple conception. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 16(11), 2316–2319. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.11.2316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., Cai, J., Liu, L., Xu, Y., Liu, Z., Chen, J., Jiang, X., Sun, X., & Ren, J. (2020). Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients? Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology : RB&E, 18(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00656-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzels, A. M., Bastiaans, B. A., Hendriks, J. C., Goverde, H. J., Punt-van der Zalm, A. P., Verbeet, J. G., & Braat, D. D. (1998). The effects of co-culture with human fibroblasts on human embryo development in vitro and implantation. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 13(5), 1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.5.1325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintner, E. M., Hershko-Klement, A., Tzadikevitch, K., Ghetler, Y., Gonen, O., Wintner, O., Shulman, A., & Wiser, A. (2017). Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo together with a good quality embryo affect the In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) outcome? Journal of Ovarian Research, 10(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-016-0297-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Kim, H. J., Lonjon, G., & Zhu, Y, written on behalf of AME Big-Data Clinical Trial Collaborative Group (2019). Balance diagnostics after propensity score matching. Annals of Translational Medicine, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.12.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar