Is there a relationship between morphokinetic parameters and neonatal sex in fresh embryo transfers?

References

• Alfarawati, S., Fragouli, E., Colls, P., Stevens, J., Gutiérrez-Mateo, C., Schoolcraft, W. B., Katz-Jaffe, M. G., & Wells, D. (2011). The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertility and Sterility, 95(2), 520–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alomar, M., Tasiaux, H., Remacle, S., George, F., Paul, D., & Donnay, I. (2008). Kinetics of fertilization and development, and sex ratio of bovine embryos produced using the semen of different bulls. Animal Reproduction Science, 107(1-2), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amir, H., Barbash-Hazan, S., Kalma, Y., Frumkin, T., Malcov, M., Samara, N., Hasson, J., Reches, A., Azem, F., & Ben-Yosef, D. (2019). Time-lapse imaging reveals delayed development of embryos carrying unbalanced chromosomal translocations. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 36(2), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1361-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermejo-Alvarez, P., Rizos, D., Lonergan, P., & Gutierrez-Adan, A. (2011). Transcriptional sexual dimorphism during preimplantation embryo development and its consequences for developmental competence and adult health and disease. Reproduction, 141(5), 563–570. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-10-0482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, M. L., & Delouis, C. (1996). Sex-related differences in the developmental rate of in-vitro matured/in-vitro fertilized ovine embryos. Human Reproduction, 11(3), 621–626. https://doi.org/10.1093/HUMREP/11.3.621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodri, D., Kawachiya, S., Sugimoto, T., Yao Serna, J., Kato, R., & Matsumoto, T. (2016). Time-lapse variables and embryo gender: a retrospective analysis of 81 live births obtained following minimal stimulation and single embryo transfer. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33(5), 589–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0678-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronet, F., Nogales, M. C., Martínez, E., Ariza, M., Rubio, C., García-Velasco, J. A., & Meseguer, M. (2015). Is there a relationship between time-lapse parameters and embryo sex? Fertility and Sterility, 103(2), 396–401.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. J., Lee, J. R., Jee, B. C., Suh, C. S., & Kim, S. H. (2009). Impact of blastocyst transfer on offspring sex ratio and the monozygotic twinning rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 91(6), 2381–2390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla, M., Fakih, M., Shunnar, A., Bayram, A., Hellani, A., Perumal, V., Divakaran, J., & Budak, E. (2015). Morphokinetic analysis of cleavage stage embryos and its relationship to aneuploidy in a retrospective time-lapse imaging study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 32(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0372-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciray, H. N., Campbell, A., Agerholm, I. E., Aguilar, J., Chamayou, S., Esbert, M., & Sayed, S. & Time-Lapse User Group. (2014). Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user group. Human Reproduction, 29(12), 2650–2660. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conaghan, J., Chen, A. A., Willman, S. P., Ivani, K., Chenette, P. E., Boostanfar, R., Baker, V. L., Adamson, G. D., Abusief, M. E., Gvakharia, M., Loewke, K. E., & Shen, S. (2013). Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial. Fertility and Sterility, 100(2), 412–419.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner, T., Tritscher, K., Mayer, R. B., Oppelt, P., Duba, H. C., Maurer, M., Schappacher-Tilp, G., Petek, E., & Shebl, O. (2016). Quantitative and qualitative trophectoderm grading allows for prediction of live birth and gender. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0609-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findikli, N., Kahraman, S., Saglam, Y., Beyazyurek, C., Sertyel, S., Karlikaya, G., Karagozoglu, H., & Aygun, B. (2006). Embryo aneuploidy screening for repeated implantation failure and unexplained recurrent miscarriage. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 13(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62014-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, P., Shukri, N. N., Vajta, G., Booth, P., Bendixen, C., & Callesen, H. (1998). Developmental kinetics of the first cell cycles of bovine in vitro produced embryos in relation to their in vitro viability and sex. Theriogenology, 50(8), 1285–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(98)00227-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, B., Ren, X., Zhu, L., Wu, L., Tan, H., Guo, N., Wei, Y., Hu, J., Liu, Q., Chen, W., Liu, J., Li, D., Liao, S., & Jin, L. (2019). Is differences in embryo morphokinetic development significantly associated with human embryo sex? Biology of Reproduction, 100(3), 618–623. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioy229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard, K., Agerholm, I. E., & Ingerslev, H. J. (2012). Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment. Human Reproduction, 27(5), 1277–1285. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochhar, H. P., Peippo, J., & King, W. A. (2001). Sex related embryo development. Theriogenology, 55(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00441-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, Y. G., Kofinas, J. D., Melzer, K., Noyes, N., McCaffrey, C., Buldo-Licciardi, J., McCulloh, D. H., & Grifo, J. A. (2014). Assessing morphokinetic parameters via time lapse microscopy (TLM) to predict euploidy: are aneuploidy risk classification models universal? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 31(9), 1231–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0285-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers, J., Reignier, A., Splingart, C., Moradkhani, K., Barrière, P., & Fréour, T. (2019). Morphokinetic parameters in chromosomal translocation carriers undergoing preimplantation genetic testing. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 38(2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, H., Li, N., Zhang, X., Sun, L., Wang, X., Hao, D., & Cui, S. (2020). Does the sex ratio of singleton births after frozen single blastocyst transfer differ in relation to blastocyst development? Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 18(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00623-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménézo, Y. J., Chouteau, J., Torelló, J., Girard, A., & Veiga, A. (1999). Birth weight and sex ratio after transfer at the blastocyst stage in humans. Fertility and Sterility, 72(2), 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00256-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meseguer, M., Herrero, J., Tejera, A., Hilligsøe, K. M., Ramsing, N. B., & Remohí, J. (2011). The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Human Reproduction, 26(10), 2658–2671. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meseguer, M., Rubio, I., Cruz, M., Basile, N., Marcos, J., & Requena, A. (2012). Embryo incubation and selection in a time-lapse monitoring system improves pregnancy outcome compared with a standard incubator: a retrospective cohort study. Fertility and Sterility, 98(6), 1481–1489.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oron, G., Sapir, O., Wertheimer, A., Shufaro, Y., Bar-Gil, R., Margalit, T., Shlush, E., & Ben-Haroush, A. (2020). A matched propensity score study of embryo morphokinetics following gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus human chorionic gonadotropin trigger. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 37(11), 2777–2782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01953-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, B. M., Boel, M., Montag, M., & Gardner, D. K. (2016). Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3. Human Reproduction, 31(10), 2231–2244. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, P., Ganguli, A., Balachandran, S., Gupta, R., & Neogi, S. B. (2018). Global sex selection techniques for family planning: a narrative review. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 36(5), 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2018.1508871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reignier, A., Girard, J. M., Lammers, J., Chtourou, S., Lefebvre, T., Barriere, P., & Freour, T. (2019). Performance of Day 5 KIDScore™ morphokinetic prediction models of implantation and live birth after single blastocyst transfer. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 36(11), 2279–2285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01567-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio, I., Galán, A., Larreategui, Z., Ayerdi, F., Bellver, J., Herrero, J., & Meseguer, M. (2014). Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope. Fertility and Sterility, 102(5), 1287–1294.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serdarogullari, M., Findikli, N., Goktas, C., Sahin, O., Ulug, U., Yagmur, E., & Bahceci, M. (2014). Comparison of gender-specific human embryo development characteristics by time-lapse technology. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 29(2), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.03.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarín, J. J., Bernabeu, R., Baviera, A., Bonada, M., & Cano, A. (1995). Sex selection may be inadvertently performed in in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer programmes. Human Reproduction, 10(11), 2992–2998. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Totey, S. M., Daliri, M., Appa Rao, K. B., Pawshe, C. H., Taneja, M., & Chillar, R. S. (1996). Differential cleavage and developmental rates and their correlation with cell numbers and sex ratios in buffalo embryos generated in vitro. Theriogenology, 45(2), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(95)00388-o
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeyad, A., Al-Abdulkareem, B., & Hammadeh, M. E. (2018). The relationship between preimplantation morphokinetics of human embryos and sex chromosome pattern. Reproductive Biology, 18(4), 385–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repbio.2018.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar