How do IVF patients interpret claims about fertility treatments? A randomised survey experiment

References

• Barnhart, K. T. (2014). Live birth is the correct outcome for clinical trials evaluating therapy for the infertile couple. Fertility and Sterility, 101(5), 1205–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, S., Hamilton, M. P., Shaaban, M., Khalaf, Y., Seddler, M., Ghobara, T., Braude, P., Kennedy, R., Rutherford, A., Hartshorne, G., & Templeton, A. (2001). Conventional in-vitro fertilisation versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 357(9274), 2075–2079. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)05179-5
   Google Scholar
• Boomsma, C. M., Kamath, M. S., Keay, S. D., & Macklon, N. S. (2022). Peri-implantation glucocorticoid administration for assisted reproductive technology cycles. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6(6), CD005996. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005996.pub3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caverly, T. J., Matlock, D. D., Prochazka, A. V., Lucas, B. P., & Hayward, R. A. (2016). Interpreting clinical trial outcomes for optimal patient care: A survey of clinicians and trainees. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 8(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-15-00137.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciani, O., Buyse, M., Drummond, M., Rasi, G., Saad, E. D., & Taylor, R. S. (2017). Time to review the role of surrogate end points in health policy: State of the art and the way forward. Value in Health 20(3), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Competition and Markets Authority. (2020). Self-funded IVF Research Qualitative Research Report, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fa01b30e90e070420702a1b/IVF_Research_Final_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cornelisse, S., Zagers, M., Kostova, E., Fleischer, K., van Wely, M., & Mastenbroek, S. (2020). Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilisation. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 9(9), CD005291. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005291.pub3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Echt, D. S., Liebson, P. R., Mitchell, L. B., Peters, R. W., Obias-Manno, D., Barker, A. H., Arensberg, D., Baker, A., Friedman, L., & Greene, H. L. (1991). Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial. The New England Journal of Medicine, 324(12), 781–788. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199103213241201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edi-Osagie, E. C., Hooper, L., McGinlay, P., & Seif, M. W. (2003). Effect(s) of assisted hatching on assisted conception (IVF & ICSI). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (4), CD001894. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, T. R., & DeMets, D. L. (1996). Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Annals of Internal Medicine, 125(7), 605–613. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-125-7-199610010-00011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. K., Prentice, L. R., Chanati, R., & Farquhar, C. (2020). Reporting assisted reproductive technology success rates on Australian and New Zealand fertility clinic websites. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 60(1), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havrilesky, L. J., Alvarez Secord, A., Ehrisman, J. A., Berchuck, A., Valea, F. A., Lee, P. S., Gaillard, S. L., Samsa, G. P., Cella, D., Weinfurt, K. P., Abernethy, A. P., & Reed, S. D. (2014). Patient preferences in advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer. Cancer, 120(23), 3651–3659. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2021). Code of Practice, 9th Edition. https://portal.hfea.gov.uk/knowledge-base/read-the-code-of-practice/
   Google Scholar
• Kleijkers, S. H., Mantikou, E., Slappendel, E., Consten, D., van Echten-Arends, J., Wetzels, A. M., van Wely, M., Smits, L. J., van Montfoort, A. P., Repping, S., Dumoulin, J. C., & Mastenbroek, S. (2016). Influence of embryo culture medium (G5 and HTF) on pregnancy and perinatal outcome after IVF: a multicenter RCT. Human Reproduction, 31(10), 2219–2230. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lensen, S., Chen, S., Goodman, L., Rombauts, L., Farquhar, C., & Hammarberg, K. (2021). IVF add-ons in Australia and New Zealand: A systematic assessment of IVF clinic websites. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 61(3), 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lensen, S., Hammarberg, K., Polyakov, A., Wilkinson, J., Whyte, S., Peate, M., & Hickey, M. (2021). How common is add-on use and how do patients decide whether to use them? A national survey of IVF patients. Human Reproduction, 36(7), 1854–1861. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lensen, S. F., Wilkinson, J., Leijdekkers, J. A., La Marca, A., Mol, B. W. J., Marjoribanks, J., Torrance, H., & Broekmans, F. J. (2018). Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2(2), CD012693. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012693.pub2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qualtrics. (2005). Qualtrics Online Survey Tool (Version 2021). Provo, Utah, USA. Retrieved from https://www.qualtrics.com/
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, S., Menkes, D. B., & Lexchin, J. (2013). Surrogate outcomes in clinical trials: a cautionary tale. JAMA Internal Medicine, 173(8), 611–612. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Melbourne. (2021). In(fertility) Research Panel. https://medicine.unimelb.edu.au/school-structure/obstetrics-and-gynaecology/research/fertility-panel
   Google Scholar
• van de Wiel, L., Wilkinson, J., Athanasiou, P., & Harper, J. (2020). The prevalence, promotion and pricing of three IVF add-ons on fertility clinic websites. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 41(5), 801–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.07.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J., Vail, A., & Roberts, S. A. (2017). Direct-to-consumer advertising of success rates for medically assisted reproduction: a review of national clinic websites. BMJ Open, 7(1), e012218. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar