A new development in the cryopreservation of sperm

References

• Barthelemy, C, Royere, D, Hamamah, S, et al. Ultrastructural changes in the membrane and acrosome of human sperm heads during freezing-thawing process. Archives of Andrology 1990; 25: 29–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtens JL, Paquignon M. Ultrastructure of fresh, frozen and frozen-thawed spermatozoa of the boar. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Deep Freezing of Boar Semen, LA Johnson, K Larsson. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala 1985; 61–87, In
   Google Scholar
• Crister JK, Kleihans FW, Mazur P. Fundamental cryobiology of human sperm. Cryobiology 1991; 28: 525–525
   Google Scholar
• Curry MR, Millar JD, Watson PF. Calculated optimal cooling rates for ram and human spermatozoa fail to conform with empirical observations. Biology of Reproduction 1994; 51: 1014–1021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry MR, Redding BJ, Watson PF. Determination of water permeability coefficient and its activation energy for rabbit spermatozoa. Cryobiology 1995; 32: 175–181
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Guidance Notes on the Processing, Storage and Issue of Bone Marrow and Blood Stem Cells. Department of Health, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Devireddy RM, Swanlund DJ, Roberts KP, Pryor JL, Bischof JC. The effect of extracellular ice and cryoprotective agents on the water permeability parameters of human sperm plasma membrane during freezing. Human Reproduction 2000; 15: 1125–1135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalier D, Bisson JP. Quantitative ultrastructural modifications in human spermatozoa after freezing. Human Artificial Insemination and Semen Preservation, G David, WS Price. Plenum Press, New York 1980; 107–122, In
   Google Scholar
• Gao D, Liu C, Mazur P, Crister ES, Crister JK. Effects of super-cooling and potential intracellular ice formation on cryosurvival of human spermatozoa. Journal of Andrology 1994; 15: 25–25
   Google Scholar
• Gao D, Mazur P, Crister JK. Fundamental cryobiology of mammalian spermatozoa. Reproductive Tissue Banking — Scientific Principles, AM Karow, JK Crister. Academic Press, San Diego 1997; 263–328, In
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, JA, Liu, J, Woods, EJ, et al. Cryoprotective agent and cryoprotective effects on human sperm membrane permeabilities: convergence of theoretical and empirical approaches for optimal cryopreservation methods. Human Reproduction 2000; 15: 335–343
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gunasena KT, Crister JK. Utility of viable tissue ex vivo. Banking of reproductive cells. Reproductive Tissue Banking — Scientific Principles, AM Karow, JK Crister. Academic Press, San Diego 1997; 1–21, In
   Google Scholar
• Henry MA, Noiles EE, Gao DY, Mazur P, Crister JK. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa. IV. The effects of cooling rate and warming rate on the maintenance of motility, plasma membrane integrity and mitochondrial function. Fertility and Sterility 1993; 60: 911–918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris GJ, Acton E, Avery S. A novel approach to sperm cryopreservation. Human Reproduction 1999; 14: 1013–1021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noiles EE, Mazur P, Watson PF, Kleinhans KW, Crister JK. Determination of water permeability coefficient for human spermatozoa and its activation energy. Biology of Reproduction 1993; 48: 99–109
   Google Scholar
• Oettle EE, Soley JT. Ultrastructural changes in the acrosome of human sperm during freezing and thawing: a pilot trial. Archives of Andrology 1986; 17: 145–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paynter SJ, Ruppert-Lingham CJ, Godfrey J, Morris GJ. The effect of non-linear vs linear slow freezing rates on mature murine oocytes. Cryobiology, in press
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen H, Lebech PE. Ultrastructural changes in the human spermatozoon after freezing for artificial insemination. Fertility and Sterility 1971; 22: 125–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pegg DE. Simple equations for obtaining melting points and eutectic temperatures for the ternary system glycerol/sodium chloride/water. Cryo Letters 1983; 4: 259–268
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Martinez H, Ekwall H. Electron microscopy in the assessment of cryopreserved sperm viability. Microscopy and Analysis May, 1988; 29–31
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder-Jenkins M, Rothman SA. Causes of donor rejection in a sperm banking program. Fertility and Sterility 1986; 51: 903–906
   Google Scholar
• Sherman JK, Liu KC. Ultrastructure before freezing, while frozen, and after thawing in assessing cryoinjury of mouse epididymal spermatozoa. Cryobiology 1982; 19: 503–510
   Google Scholar
• Sidhu, RS, Sharma, RK, Kachoria, S, et al. Reasons for rejecting potential donors from a sperm bank program. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1997; 6: 354–360
   Google Scholar
• Teddar, RS, Zuckermann, MA, Goldstone, AH, et al. Hepatitis B transmission from contaminated cryopreservation tank. Lancet 1995; 346: 137–140
   Google Scholar
• Thurston LM, Watson PF, Mileham AJ, Holt WV. Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation. Journal of Andrology 2001; 22: 382–394
   Google Scholar
• Thyer AC, Patton PE, Burry KA, Mixon BA, Wolf DP. Fecund-ability trends among sperm donors as a measure of donor performance. Fertility and Sterility 1999; 71: 891–895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittingham DG. Some factors affecting embryo storage in laboratory animals. The Freezing of Mammalian Embryos. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1977; 97–108, In Ciba Foundation Symposium 52
   Google Scholar
• Whittingham DG, Leibo SP, Mazur P. Survival of mouse embryos frozen to -196°C and -269°C. Science 1972; 187: 411–414
   Google Scholar