Developing recommendations for consortial cataloging of electronic resources: Lessons learned

References

• Sandberg-Fox, A. (2001) The microcomputer revolution. S.K. Roe(Ed.), The audiovisual cataloging current, New York: Haworth Information Press, 85-99.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, A.K. (2003) Proliferating guidelines: A history and analysis of the cataloging of electronic resources. Library Resources & Technical Services, 47(4) , 171-187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, G. & Aldana, L. (2001) Integrating electronic resources into the library catalog: A collaborative approach. Portal, 1(3) , 241-256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, C.H., & King, D.W., (2002). Comparing library and user related costs of print and electronic journal collections. D-Lib Magazine, 8(10). Retrieved February 9, 2005, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october02/montgomery/10montgomery.html
   Google Scholar
• Briscoe, G., Selden, K. & Nyberg, C.R. (2003) The catalog vs. the home page? Best practices in connecting to online resources. Law Library Journal, 78(2) , 151-174.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X.Colgan, L.Greene, C.Lowe, E.Winke, C. (2004) E-resource cataloging practices: A survey of academic libraries and consortia. Serials Librarian, 47(1/2) , 153-179.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, A.K. (2003) Proliferating guidelines: A history and analysis of the cataloging of electronic resources. Library Resources & Technical Services, 47(4) , 171-187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooperative Online Serials Program (CONSER). (2003). Separate records: The aggregator neutral record (pp. 16–19 in CONSER Cataloging Manual Module 31, 2003 update). Retrieved February 9, 2005, from http://www.loc.gov/acq/conser/guidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Library of Congress Cataloging Directorate. (2004). Recommendations for modes of cataloging for electronic resources. Retrieved February 9, 2005, from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/stratplan/goal4wg2report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ILCSO Users' Advisory Group Cataloging Electronic Resources/Electronic Resources Display in the OPAC Task Force (CatER). (2004). Final report. Retrieved February 9, 2005, from http://office.ilcso.illinois.edu/Reports/iuagcater/040419_cater_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ILCSO Users' Advisory Group Consortial Cataloging and Authority Control Committee (CCAC). (2004). Suppression of bibliographic records from the Universal Catalog. Retrieved February 9, 2005, from http://www.ilcso.uiuc.edu/Reports/iuagccac/040602_suppfromuc.html
   Google Scholar
• ILCSO Users' Advisory Group Consortial Cataloging and Authority Control Committee (CCAC). (2004). Cooperative cataloging guidelines for Illinet online. Retrieved February 9, 2005, from http://www.ilcso.uiuc.edu/Docs/cataloging_guidelines.html
   Google Scholar
• ILCSO Users' Advisory Group Cataloging Electronic Resources/Electronic Resources Display in the OPAC Task Force (CatER). (2004). Final report. Retrieved February 9, 2005, from http://office.ilcso.illinois.edu/Reports/iuagcater/040419_cater_final.pdf. Glossary.
   Google Scholar
• ILCSO Users' Advisory Group Cataloging Electronic Resources Task Force. (2000). Recommendation on fields to use to record URLs in DRA. Retrieved February 9, 2005, from http://office.ilcso.illinois.edu/Reports/catertf/catertf_856and866_justif.html
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. (December 17, 2004). 856 fields. Message Posted to AUTOCAT Electronic Mailing List, Archived Available at: http://listserv.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0412c&L=autocat&F=&S=&P=5827
   Google Scholar
• Ohiolink. Database Management and Standards Committee. (2004). Standards for cataloging electronic resources. Retrieved February 9, 2005, from http://platinum.ohiolink.edu/dms/ercatstandards.htm
   Google Scholar
• Giles, V. (2003) Single or multiple records for print and electronic serials titles: When less is more (more or less). Serials Librarian, 45(1) , 35-45.
   Google Scholar
• Cooperative Online Serials Program (CONSER). (2003). Separate records: The aggregator neutral record (pp. 16–19 in CONSER Cataloging Manual Module 31, 2003 update). Retrieved February 9, 2005, from http://www.loc.gov/acq/conser/guidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ISO/TC 46/SC 9 Working Group 5. (2004). Notes of the ISO/TC 46/SC 9 Working Group 5 meeting, October 25–26, 2004. Retrieved February 9, 2005, from http://www.collectionscanada.ca/iso/tc46sc9/wg5/wg5n19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tillett, B. (2004). What is FRBR? A conceptual model for the bibliographic universe. Retrieved February 9, 2005, from http://www.loc.gov/cds/downloads/FRBR.PDF
   Google Scholar