An investigation of user perceptions and behavioral intentions towards the e-library

References

• Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., & Todd, P.A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?. Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V. & Stair, R.M. (2000). Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy—An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, H. (2007). Internet banking adoption among young intellectuals. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 12(3), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice. A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, N.P., Head, M.M., & Yuan, Y. (1996). Patterns in information search for decision making: The effects of information abstraction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(5), 599–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avgerinou, M.D. (2009). Re-viewing visual literacy in the “Bain d' Images” era. TechTrends, 53(2), 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L.W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. (1998). Testing a digital library of technical manuals. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 41(2), 116–122.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, C.L., & Schamber, L. (1998). Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparison. Information Processing and Management, 34(2), 219–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, C.A., & Squires, D. (1995, December). Why the move from traditional information-seeking to the electronic library is not straightforward for academic users: Some surprising findings. In D.I. RaittB. Jeapes(Eds.), Online information 95: Nineteenth international online information meeting: Proceedings. (pp. 177–187). Oxford: Learned Information Europe Ltd..
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P.M. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, R.M. (1990). Effects of processing instructions on the usefulness of a graphic organizer and structural cueing in text. Instructional Science, 19, 207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation–confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgman, C.L. (1989). All users of information retrieval systems are not created equal: An exploration into individual differences. Information Processing and Management, 25(3), 237–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branscomb, L.M. & Thomas, J.C. (1985). Ease of use: A system design challenge. IBM Systems Journal, 23(3), 224–235.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, S., & Salako, A. (2009). Evaluating the usability and usefulness of a digital library. Library Review, 58(9), 638–651.
   Google Scholar
• Carlock, D. & Perry, A. (2008). Exploring faculty experiences with ebooks: A focus group. Library Hi Tech, 26(2), 244–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S.C., & Tung, F.C. (2008). An empirical investigation of students' behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 71–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L.S. (2010). Applying swarm intelligence to a library system. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 34(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Czerwinski, M., & Macredie, R. (2000). Individual differences in virtual environments—Introduction and overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 499–507.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W.C., & Todd, P.A. (1995). On the use, usefulness and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: A note of caution. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C.M.,Lin, H.Y.,Sun, S.Y.,Hsu, M.H. (2009). Understanding customers' loyalty intentions towards online shopping: An integration of technology acceptance model and fairness theory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(4), 347–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, V., Cheng, T.C.E. & Lai, W.M.J. (2009). The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools. Computers & Education, 53, 216–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, H. (2003). Electronic books: Viewpoints from users and potential users. Library Hi Tech, 21(3), 340–346.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D.R., & Higgins, C.A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quaterly, 19(2), 189–211.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culnan, M.J. (1983). Environmental scanning: the effects of task complexity and source accessibility on information gathering behavior. Decision Sciences, 14, 194–206.
   Google Scholar
• Dastani, M. (2002). The role of visual perception in data visualization. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 13, 601–622.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C. (1997). Organizational influences on the university electronic library. Information Processing and Management, 33(3), 377–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technologies. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavior impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, S., & Kar, D.C. (2003). Setting up an electronic library: The case of TERI. The Electronic Library, 23(2), 189–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, S., Kar, D.C. & Kumar, S. (2003). Setting up electronic library: The case of TERI. Proceeding of the ASIS&T 2003 annual meeting “Humanizing Information Technology: From Ideas to Bias and Back”, 19–22 October, California.
   Google Scholar
• DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, A. (2000). Spatial-semantics: How users derive shape from information space. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 521–528.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, A., & Watson, C. (1996). User analysis in HCI—The historical lessons from individual difference research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(6), 619–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll, W.J., Hendrickson, A., & Deng, X. (1998). Using Davis's perceived usefulness and ease-of-use instruments for decision making: A confirmatory and multi-group invariance analysis. Decision Science, 29(4), 839–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll, W.J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G.A. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18, 453–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, E.A.,Hix, D.,Nowell, L.T.,Brueni, D.J.,Wake, W.C.Heath, L.S., et al. (1993). Users, user interfaces, and objects: Envision, a digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44, 480–491.
   Google Scholar
• Gasson, S. (1999). The reality of user-centered design. Journal of End User Computing, 11(4), 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, T.T. & Liew, C.L. (2009). SMS-based library catalogue system: A preliminary investigation of user acceptance. The Electronic Library, 27(3), 394–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M., Hannigan, K., & Curran, P. (2005). Imagine: Visual design in first-year composition. Journal of Visual Literacy, 25(1), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, A.P. (1982). The selection of channels when seeking information: Cost–benefit vs. least-effort. Information Processing and Management, 18(6), 289–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A.W., & Rainer, R.K. (1992). The influence of individual differences on skill in end user computing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1), 93–111.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, B. (2006). Delineating the effects of general and system-specific computer self-efficacy beliefs on IS acceptance. Information & Management, 43(5), 565–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, M.S. (2003). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Computers & Educations, 40(4), 343–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, L.L.,Dolin, R.,Frew, J.,Kemp, R.B.,Larsgaard, M.,Montello, D.R., et al. (1997). User evaluation: Summary of the methodologies and results for the Alexandria digital library, University of the California at Santa Barbara. C. SchwartzM. Rorvig (Eds.), Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science annual meeting, (pp. 225–243). Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc..
   Google Scholar
• Hong, W.,Thong, J.Y.L.,Wong, W.M.,Tam, K.Y. (2002). Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 97–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, L.F., Chin, J.B., & Wu, M.C. (2004). The performance indicators of university e-library in Taiwan. The Electronic Library, 22(4), 325–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh-Yee, I. (1996). Student use of online catalogs and other information channels. College and Research Libraries, 57(1), 161–175.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, M.H., & Chiu, C.M. (2004). Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behavior. Behavior and Information Technology, 23(5), 359–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, P.J.,Chau, P.Y.K.,Sheng, O.R.L.,Tam, K.Y. (1999a). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), 91–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, P.J.,, Ma, P., & Chau, P.Y.K. (1999b). Evaluation of user interface designs for information retrieval systems: A computer-based experiment. Decision Support Systems, 27(1), 125–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T., & Davis, G.B. (1995). Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(4), 87–114.
   Google Scholar
• Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igbaria, M.,Zinatelli, N.,Cragg, P.,Cavaye, A.L.M. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structure equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C.M., Chow, S., & Leitch, R.A. (1997). Toward an understanding of the behavioural intentions to use an information system. Decision Sciences, 28(2), 357–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janes, J.W. (1994). Other people's judgments: A comparison of users' and others' judgments of document relevance, topicality, and utility. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3), 160–171.
   Google Scholar
• JÖreskog, K.G., & SÖrbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLISTM command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Kling, R., & Elliott, M. (1994). Digital library design for organizational usability. SIGOIS Bulletin, 15(2), 59–69.
   Google Scholar
• Kremers, M., & van Dissel, H. (2000). ERP system migrations. Communication of the ACM, 43(4), 53–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, S.H., & Woods, P.C. (2008). An investigation of user perceptions and attitudes towards learning objects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 685–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, S.H., & Woods, P.C. (2009). Understanding learner acceptance of learning objects: The roles of learning object characteristics and individual differences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 1059–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederer, A.L.,Maupin, D.J.,Sena, M.P.,Zhuang, Y. (2000). The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29(3), 269–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M.C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users' continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computer & Education, 54(2), 506–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B.C., Yoon, J.O., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners' acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1320–1329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linde, L., & Bergstrom, M. (1988). Impact of prior knowledge of informational content and organization on learning search principles in a database. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13(2), 90–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgaard, G. (1994). Usability testing and system evaluation: A guide for designing useful computer systems. London, New York: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.,Dantzig, P.,Sachs, M.,Corey, J.T.,Hinnebusch, M.T.,Damashek, M. et al. (2002). Visualising document classification: A search aid for the digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences, 51, 216–227.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Q., & Liu, L. (2004). The technology acceptance model: A meta analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16(1), 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W., & Sugawara, H.W. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchionini, G.,Dwiggins, S.Katz, A.Lin, X., (1993). Information seeking in full-text end-user-oriented search systems: The roles of domain and search expertise. Library and Information Science Research, 15(1), 35–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchionini, G., Lin, X., & Dwiggins, S., (1990). Effects of search and subject expertise on information seeking in a hypertext environment. D. Henderson(Ed.), Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the ASIS, (pp. 129–142). New York: ASIS.
   Google Scholar
• Marchionini, G., Plaisant, C., & Komlodi, A. (1998). Interfaces and tools for the Library of Congress National Digital Library program. Information Processing and Management, 34(5), 535–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcgill, T., Hobbs, V., & Klobas, J. (2003). User-developed applications and information systems success: A test of the DeLone and McLean model. Information Resources Management Journal, 16(1), 24–45.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, J.,Gardner, J.Gray, C., Mulhern, G., (1999). Barriers to student computer usage: Staff and student perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15(4), 302–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadow, C.T., Wang, J., & Yuan, W. (1995). A study of user performance and attitudes with information retrieval interfaces. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(7), 490–505.
   Google Scholar
• MERLOT (2005). Evaluation criteria for peer reviews. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from. http://www.taste.merlot.org/evaluationcriteria.html
   Google Scholar
• Motiwalla, L., & Fairfield-Sonn, J. (1998). Measuring the impact of expert systems. Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 4, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, C.A., Coover, D., & Owen, S.V. (1989). Development and validation of the computer self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49(4), 893–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D.L. (1990). Individual adjustment to information-driven technologies: A critical review. MIS Quarterly, 14(1), 79–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbit, J.C., Belfer, K., & Leacock, T. (2003). Learning object review instrument (LORI). Retrieved March 7, 2008, fromhttp://www.elera.net.
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, C.A. (1982). Variations in decision makers' use of information sources: The impact of quality and accessibility of information. Academy of Management Journal, 25(4), 756–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parikh, M., & Verma, S. (2002). Utilizing Internet technologies to support learning: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 22(1), 27–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, T.K. (1994). Toward a theory of user-based relevance: A call for a new paradigm of inquiry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3), 135–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2000). Usability, user preferences, effectiveness, and user behaviors when searching individual and integrated full-text databases: Implications for digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(5), 456–468.
   Google Scholar
• Payette, S.D., & Rieger, O.Y. (1998). Supporting scholarly inquiry: Incorporating users in the design of the digital library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 24(2), 121–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramayah, T. (2006a). Doing e-research with e-library: Determinants of perceived ease of use of e-library. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 1(4), 71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Ramayah, T. (2006b). Interface characteristics, perceived ease of use and intention to use an online library in Malaysia. Information Development, 22(2), 123–133.
   Google Scholar
• Ramayah, T., & Aafaqi, I. (2004). Role of self-efficacy in e-library usage among students of a public university in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 9(1), 39–57.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, R.,Pedersen, J.O.,Hearst, M.A.,Mackinlay, J.D.,Card, S.K.,Masinter, L. et al. (1995). Rich interaction in the digital library. Communications of the ACM, 38, 29–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivard, S., Poirier, G., Raymond, L., Bergeron, F. (1997). Development of a measure to assess the quality of userdeveloped applications. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 28(3), 44–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations, 4th ed. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saade, R. & Bahli, B. (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(2), 317–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saade, R.G. & Otrakji, C.A. (2007). First impressions last a lifetime: Effects of interface type on disorientation and cognitive load. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 525–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman, M.A. (1998). Developing visual displays for lecture-based courses. Teaching of Psychology, 25(2), 141–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segars, A.H., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17(4), 517–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segars, A.H., & Grover, V. (1998). Strategic information systems planning success: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. MIS Quarterly, 22(2), 139–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEGYE (2010). [Note, this guy] largest e-library for children ‘buktobi’, Gang president of ‘buktobi’. Retrieved fromhttp://www.segye.com/Articles/NEWS/CULTURE/Article.asp?aid=20100412003494&subctg1=&subctg2=.
   Google Scholar
• Selim, H.M. (2003). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Computers & Education, 40(4), 343–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayo, C., Guthrie, R., & Igbaria, M. (1999). Exploring the measurement of end user computing success. Journal of End User Computing, 11(1), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shelburne, W.A. (2009). E-book usage in an academic library: User attitudes and behaviors. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 33(2–3), 59–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spink, A., Greisdorf, H., & Bateman, J. (1998). From highly relevant to not relevant: Examining different regions of relevance. Information Processing and Management, 34(5), 599–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, R.W., Good, D.J., & Baker-Eveleth, L. (2007). The impact of information technology on individual and firm marketing performance. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(6), 465–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, L.T. (1994). The relevance of recall and precision in user evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(3), 207–217.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Todd, P.A. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Todd, P.A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thong, J.Y.L., Hong, W., & Tam, K.Y. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences?. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 57(3), 215–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thong, J.Y.L., Hong, W. & Tam, K.Y. (2004). What leads to user acceptance of digital libraries?. Communications of the ACM, 47(11), 79–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombros, A., Ruthven, I. & Jose, J.M. (2004). How users assess web pages for information-seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(4), 327–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travica, B. (1997). Organizational aspects of the virtual/digital library: A survey of academic libraries. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science annual meeting, (pp. 149–161). Medford, N.J.: Information Today INC.
   Google Scholar
• Tsakonas, G., & Papatheodorou, C. (2006). Analyzing and evaluating usefulness and usability in electronic information services. Journal of Information Science, 32(5), 400–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (1994). Modeling the Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 213–227). Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Speier, C. & Morris, M.G. (2002). User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model. Decision Sciences, 33(2), 297–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, A.,Forbes, A.Bloomfield, J.Gee, C.F. (2004). An exploration of four web-based open and flexible learning modules in post-registration nurse education. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(4), 411–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J.H., & Wang, S.C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(5), 719–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, H. (2006). Evaluation of digital libraries: Criteria and problems from users' perspectives. Library & Information Science Research, 28(3), 433–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, M.Y., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: Self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 431–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusoff, Y.M.,Muhammad, Z.,Zahari, M.S.M.,Pasah, E.S.,Robert, E. (2009). Individual differences, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness in the e-Library usage. Computer and Information Science, 2(1), 76–83.
   Google Scholar