References
- Anderson, K.J., et al. (2002). Buy, don't borrow: Bibliographers' analysis of academic library collection development through interlibrary loan requests. Collection Management, 27(3/4), 1–11.
- Battaile, C. (1992). Circulation services in a small academic library. Greenwood: Westport, Connecticut.
- Campbell, S.A. (2006). To buy or to borrow, that is the question. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve, 16(3), 35–39.
- Chan, G. (2004). Purchase instead of borrow: An international perspective. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply, 14(4), 23–37.
- Fowler, D.C., & Arcand, Janet (2003). Monographs acquisitions time and cost studies: The next generation. Library Resources & Technical Services, 47(3), 109–124.
- Gibson, T.M., & Kirkwood, P.E. (2009). A POD pilot project at the University of Arkansas, for the proceedings of the Materials Research Society symposiums. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve, 19, 47–56.
- Hulsey, R. (2003). Purchase on demand: A better customer service model. Library Journal, 128(10), 77.
- Jackson, M.E. (2004). Assessing ILL/DD services: New cost-effective alternatives. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
- Lawrence, S.R., et al. (2001). Life cycle costs of library collections: Creation of effective performance and cost metrics for library resources. College and Research Libraries, 62(6), 541–553.
- Morris, D.E., et al. (2000). Cataloging staff costs revisited. Library Resources & Technical Services, 44(2), 70–83.
- Naylor, T. (1997). The cost of interlibrary loan services in a medium-sized academic library. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply, 8(2), 50–61.
- Nixon, J.M., & Saunders, E.S. (2010). A study of circulation statistics of books on demand: A decade of patron-driven collection development, part 3. Collection Management, 35(3/4), 151–161.
- Perdue, J., & Van Fleet, J.A. (1999). Borrow or buy? Cost-effect delivery of monographs. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply, 9(4), 19–28.
- Ruppel, M. (2006). Tying collection development's loose ends with interlibrary loan. Collection Building, 25(3), 72–77.
- Slight-Gibney, N. (1999). How far have we come? Benchmarking time and costs for monograph purchasing. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 23(1), 47–59.
- Tyler, D.C., et al. (2010). Just how right are the customers? An analysis of the relative performance of patron-initiated interlibrary loan monograph purchases. Collection Management, 35(3/4), 162–179.
- Ward, S.M., et al. (2003). Collection development based on patron requests: Collaboration between interlibrary loan and acquisitions. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 27, 203–213.
- Way, D. (2009). The assessment of patron-initiated collection development via interlibrary loan at a comprehensive university. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve, 19, 299–308.
- Zopfi-Jordan, D. (2008). Purchasing or borrowing: Making interlibrary loan decisions that enhance patron satisfaction. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve, 18(3), 387–394.