2,511
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Interface

Finding hope in unpromising times: Stories of progressive planning alternatives for a world in crisis/Neoliberal planning is not the only way: mapping the regressive tendencies of planning practice/Can Batlló: Sustaining an insurgent urbanism/Dynamic planning initiated by residents: Implementable plans for the informal built urban fabric of the Palestinian neighbourhoods of East Jerusalem/REDWatch: Monitory democracy as a radical approach to citizen participation in planning/Making space for public ownership: The re-municipalisation of public services through grassroots struggle and local state action/“Neighbourhood inquiry”: For a post-political politics/Looking inwards: Extended family living as an urban consolidation alternative/Grow your own

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Page 529 | Published online: 16 Dec 2013

REFERENCES

  • Allen, C. (2008). Housing market renewal and social class. London: Routledge.
  • Barker, K. (2004). Review of Housing Supply: Delivering Stability: Securing our Future Final Report: Recommendations. London: HMSO.
  • Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Mayer, M. (2012). Cities for people, not for profit: An introduction. In N.Brenner, P.Marcuse, & M.Mayer (Eds.), Cities for people, not for profit. London: Routledge.
  • Department of Community and Local Government (2012). National Planning Policy Framework. London: DCLG.
  • Dorling, D. (2011a). Government policies have increased social inequalities in the past year. Compass website commentary. Retrieved from http://is.gd/gNjmwB.
  • Dorling, D. (2011b). Injustice: Why social inequality persists. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  • Fenster, T. (2001). Planning, culture, knowledge and control. In O.Yiftachel, J.Little, D.Hedgcock, & I.Alexander (Eds.), The power of planning: Spaces of control and transformation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • Harvey, D. (1976). Social justice and the city. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Ortiz, I., & Cummins, M. (2011). Global inequality: Beyond the bottom billion – A rapid review of income distribution in 141 countries. UNICEF Social and Economic Policy Working Paper. New York, NY: UNICEF.
  • Owens, S., & Cowell, R. (2002). Land and limits: Interpreting sustainability in the planning process. London: Routledge.
  • Tyler, I. (2013). Revolting subjects: Social abjection and resistance in Neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.
  • Winkler, T. (2009). Believing in market forces in Johannesburg. In L.Porter & K.Shaw (Eds.), Whose urban Renaissance? An international comparison of urban regeneration strategies. London: Routledge.
  • World Bank. (2005). World development report 2006: Equity and development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Yiftachel, O. (2009). Critical theory and “gray space”: Mobilization of the colonized. City, 13, 246–263.

REFERENCES

  • Harvey, David. (2012). Rebel cities. From the right to the city to the urban commons. New York, NY: Verso Books.
  • Holston, James. (1999). Spaces of insurgent citizenship. In JamesHolston (Ed.), Cities and citizenship. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Lefebvre, Henri. (1970). La révolution urbaine. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Muñoz, X. (2004). Muñoz Ramonet, societat il·limitada. Barcelona: Edicions 62.
  • Sennet, Richard. (2012). Together. The rituals, pleasures and politics of cooperation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

REFERENCES

  • Alfasi, N., & Portugali, J. (2007). Planning rules for a self-planned city. Planning Theory, 6, 164–182.
  • Fainstein, S. (2000). New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35, 451–478.
  • Fenster, T. (2009). Planning from “below” in Israel: Reflections on the public interest. Geography Research Forum, 29, 138–151.
  • Sandercock, L. (1998). Towards cosmopolis: Planning for multicultural cities. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

REFERENCES

  • Adair, K. (2010). The rebel of Redfern. City Hub. Sydney: Alternative Media Group.
  • Keane, J. (2009). The life and death of democracy. London: Pocket Books.
  • McClymont, K. (2011). Revitalising the political: Development control and agonism in planning practice. Planning Theory, 10, 239–256.
  • NSW Government. (2009). Government information (public access) act 2009. Sydney: Parliamentary Counsel's Office.
  • NSW Government. (2013a). Draft metropolitan strategy for Sydney to 2031 – March 2013. Sydney: NSW Government.
  • NSW Government. (2013b). A new planning system for NSW: White paper. Sydney: NSW Government.
  • Rogers, D. (2013). Tenant participation, social housing and democracy: Tensions between expectations and realities. HousingWORKS, 10, 5–7.
  • Urban Growth NSW. (2012). Overview. Retrieved from http://www.urbangrowthnsw.com.au/about-us/overview.aspx.

REFERENCES

  • Cumbers, A. (2012). Reclaiming public ownership: Making space for economic democracy. London: Zed.
  • Hall, D., Lobina, E., and Torherst, P. (2012). Remunicipalising municipal services in Europe: a report commissioned by the European Federation of Public Services Unions. Greenwich: Public Services International Research Unit.
  • Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lobina, R., & Hall, D. (2007). Water privatisation and restructuring in Latin America. Greenwich: Public Services International Research Unit.
  • Mason, P. (2012). Why it’s kicking off everywhere: The new global revolutions. London: Verso.
  • McDonald & Ruiters. (2012). Alternatives to privatization: Public options for essential services in the global south. London: Routledge.
  • Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34, 380–404.
  • Reiter, D. (2011). Welcome address to the CESifo (Centre for Economic Studies). Conference on Public Sector Economics 10th Forum, Munich. Retrieved from www.epsu.org/IMG/pdf/Munich-DieterReiter.pdf.
  • Terhorst, P. (2008). Huancayo: From resistance to public-public partnership, transnational institute paper. Retrieved from http://www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/archives/books/waterhuancayo.pdf.

REFERENCES

  • Cleaver, H. (1979). Reading capital politically. Sussex: The Harvester Press.
  • Gray, N. (2009). Glasgow's Merchant city: An artist led property strategy. Variant, 34, 14–19.
  • Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso Books.
  • Panzieri. (1965). The socialist use of workers' inquiry. Retrieved July 30, 2013, from European Institute for Progressive Cultural Policies (EIPCP): http://eipcp.net/transversal/0406/panzieri/en.
  • Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29, 740–770.
  • Peck, J. (2012). Austerity urbanism. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 16, 626–655.
  • Ross, K. (2002). Establishing consensus: May '68 in France as seen from the 1980s. Critical Inquiry, 28, 650–676.
  • Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. London: Routledge.
  • Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode, 34, 427–450.
  • Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2012). The local politics of policy mobility: Learning, persuasion, and the production of a municipal sustainability fix. Environment and Planning A, 44, 1389–1406.
  • Uitermark, J. W., Duyvendak, J., & Kleinhans, R. (2007). Gentrification as a governmental strategy: Social control and social cohesion in Hoogvliet, Rotterdam. Environment and Planning A, 39, 125–141.
  • Wright, S. (2002). Storming heaven: Class composition and struggle in Italian autonomous Marxism. London: Pluto Press.
  • Zukin, S. (1988). Loft living: Culture and capital in urban change. London: Radius.

REFERENCES

  • ABS. (2012). 2011 Census Quickstats – Australia. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
  • Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 715–734.
  • Berners-Lee, M. (2010). How bad are bananas? The carbon footprint of nearly everything. London: Profile Books.
  • Buzar, S., Ogden, P. E., & Hall, R. (2005). Households matter: The quiet demography of urban transformation. Progress in Human Geography, 29, 413–436.
  • de Vaus, D. (2004). Extended families and multifamily households. Diversity and change in Australian families (pp. 66–77). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
  • Easthope, H., & Tice, A. (2011). Children in apartments: Implications for the compact city. Urban Policy and Research, 29, 415–434.
  • Gibson, C., Farbotko, C., Gill, N., Head, L., & Waitt, G. (2013). Household sustainability: Challenges and dilemmas in everyday life. UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Jarvis, H. (2013). Against the “tyranny” of single-family dwelling: Insights from Christiania at 40. Gender, Place & Culture. 10.1080/0966369X.2012.753583.
  • Keene, J. R., & Batson, C. D. (2010). Under one roof: A review of research on intergenerational coresidence and multigenerational households in the United States. Sociology Compass, 4, 642–657.
  • Keilman, N. (2003). Biodiversity: The threat of small households. Nature, 421, 489–490.
  • Klocker, N., Gibson, C., & Borger, E. (2012). Living together but apart: Material geographies of everyday sustainability in extended family households. Environment and Planning A, 44, 2240–2259.
  • Myers, D. (2001). Demographic futures as a guide to planning: California's Latinos and the compact city. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67, 383–397.
  • New South Wales Department of Planning and Infrastructure. (2011). Factsheet: Supporting secondary dwellings (granny flats). December 2011.
  • New South Wales Department of Planning and Infrastructure. (2011). State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental), Sydney: NSW Government.
  • Randolph, B. (2006). Delivering the compact city in Australia: Current trends and future implications. Urban Policy and Research, 24, 473–490.
  • Rérat, P. (2012). Housing, the compact city and sustainable development: Some insights from recent urban trends in Switzerland. International Journal of Housing Policy, 12, 115–136.
  • Wulff, M., Healy, E., & Reynolds, M. (2004). Why don't small households live in small dwellings? Disentangling a planning dilemma. People and Place, 12, 58–71.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.