Meta-governance and developing integrated territorial strategies: The case study of MIRT territorial agendas in the Randstad (Netherlands)

References

• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A, 41, 617–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., Haughton, G., Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (Eds.). (in press). Soft spaces. Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Lagendijk, A., & Jacobs, W. (2007). A theory of institutional change: Illustrated by Dutch city-provinces and Dutch land policy. Environment and Planning A, 39, 891–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinge, C., Bentley, G., Damsgaard, O., Gibney, J., Boje Groth, N., Larsson, L., & Zonneveld, W. (2012). RISE regional integrated strategies in Europe: Final Report ESPON, targeted analysis 2013/2/11. Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. (1997). The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies, regional development studies. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, H., & Ten Heuvelhof, E. F. (2002). Policy analysis and decision making in a network: How to improve the quality of analysis and the impact on decision making. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 20, 232–242.
   Google Scholar
• De Jonge, J. (2011). De toekomst duwt van achteren [The future pushes from behind]. In J.Goedman, W.Zonneveld, & W. H.Houtsma (Eds.), Ruimtelijke Ontwikkeling in Drievoud [Triplicated spatial development] (pp. 117–129). Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, J., & Evers, D. (2008). Bestuur en ruimte: De Randstad in internationaal perspectief[Government and territory: International perspectives on the Randstad]. Den Haag/Rotterdam: Ruimtelijk Planbureau/NAi Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Delanty, G., & Rumford, C. (2005). Rethinking Europe. Social theory and the implications of Europeanization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A., & Van der Valk, A. (1994). Rule and order; Dutch planning doctrine in the twentieth century. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Frieling, D. (1997). Verstedelijking als politieke opgave [Urbanisation as a national task]. Stedebouw & Ruimtelijke Ordening, 78, 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis in the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2010). Authoritative governance: Policy making in the age of mediatization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harteveld, E. (2014). In search of strategic capacity: An evaluation of the effectiveness of collaborative spatial planning in the southern Randstad as reflected by the performance of the Adaptive Agenda Southern Randstad 2014 (Master's thesis, uuid Repository: 73bd40eb-4d01–4973-b052-06d775b07985). Delft University of Technology (Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management), Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D., & Vigar, G. (2010). The new spatial planning. Territorial management with soft spaces and fuzzy boundaries. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies. Towards a relational planning for our times, RTPI library series. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heinelt, H., & Kübler, D. (Eds.). (2005). Metropolitan governance; capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2004). Multi-level governance and multi-level metagovernance changes in the European Union as integral moments in the transformation and reorientation of contemporary statehood. In I.Bache & M.Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 49–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalliomäki, H. (2012). Towards comprehensive spatial development in Europe: A critical view from Finland. Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 569–589.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M. (2004). The history of governance in the Netherlands: Continuity and exceptions. The Hague: Elsevier Overheid.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E., & Edelenbos, J. (2007). Metagovernance as network management. In E.Sørensen & J.Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 199–214). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. (2009). Infrastructure and spatial planning. Netherlands, Working PaperOxford: Department of Planning, Oxford Brookes University.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. (2011). Planning at the national level in Europe in relation to major infrastructure. European Planning Studies, 19, 887–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2008). European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. disP – The Planning Review, 44, 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). OECD territorial reviews: Randstad Holland, The Netherlands. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). OECD territorial reviews: Netherlands 2014. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. B. (1998). Managing horizontal government: The politics of coordination (Research Paper No. 21). Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raad voor de financiële verhoudingen. (2011). Distribution, trust and accountability: A reorientation of the financial relations in the Netherlands. Den Haag: Raad voor de financiële verhoudingen.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, A.R., Sehested, K., & Sorensen, E. (2011). Emerging theoretical understanding of pluricentric coordination in public governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 41, 375–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44, 652–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rijk, provincie Utrecht, gemeente Utrecht, Bestuur Regio Utrecht, gemeente Amersfoort, Regio Amersfoort, gemeente Hilversum, & Gewest Gooi en Vechtstreek. (2009). Gebiedsagenda Utrecht 2009[Territorial agenda Utrecht 2009]. Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Rijk & Zuidvleugelpartners. (2010). Gebiedsagenda Zuidvleugel/Zuid-Holland: Een wereldregio[Territorial Agenda South Wing/South Holland: A global region]. Den Haag: Rijksoverheid en Bestuurlijk Platform Zuidvleugel.
   Google Scholar
• Salet, W. (2006). Rescaling territorial governance in the Randstad Holland: The responsiveness of spatial and institutional strategies to changing socio-economic interactions. European Planning Studies, 14, 959–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salet, W., Thornley, A., & Kreukels, A. (Eds.). (2003). Metropolitan governance and spatial planning; Comparative case studies of European city-regions. London/New York: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Games real actors could play: Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6, 27–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehested, K. (2009). Urban planners as network managers and metagovernors. Planning Theory & Practice, 10, 245–263.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. (2004). Democratic governance and the role of public administrators. In P.Bogason, S.Kensen, & H. T.Miller (Eds.), Tampering with tradition: The unrealized authority of democratic agency (pp. 107–130). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. (2006). Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. American Review of Public Administration, 36, 98–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87, 234–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaans, M., Waterhout, B., & Zonneveld, W. (2012). RISE Regional Integrated Strategies in Europe: Annex 3 Randstad case study: The making of integrative territorial strategies in a multi-level and multi-actor policy environment. ESPON, Targeted analysis 2013/2/11. Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• Stadsregio Amsterdam, Provincie Flevoland, Provincie Noord-Holland, & Rijksoverheid. (2009). Gebiedsagenda Noordwest-Nederland[Territorial Agenda Northwest Netherlands]. Amsterdam: Metropoolregio Amsterdam, Noord-Holland & Flevoland.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., & Meijers, E. (2009). Spatial planning and policy integration: Concepts, facilitators and inhibitors. Planning Theory & Practice, 10, 317–332.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M. (2014). Governing the large metropolis. Territory, Politics, Governance, 2, 115–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struiksma, H., Tillema, T., & Arts, J. (2008, July). Space for mobility: Towards a paradigm shift in Dutch transport infrastructure planning? Paper presented at the 4th AESOP-ACSP Joint Congress, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. (1992). Planning as persuasive storytelling about the future: Negotiating an electric power rate settlement in Illinois. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 12, 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. (1996). Planning as persuasive storytelling: The rhetorical construction of Chicago's electric future. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. (2003). Planning as persuasive storytelling in a global-scale web of relationships. Planning Theory, 2, 125–151.
   Google Scholar
• Toonen, T. A. J. (1990). The unitary state as a system of co-governance: The case of the Netherlands. Public Administration, 68, 281–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M. (2003). “In the shadow of hierarchy”: Meta-governance, policy reform and urban regeneration in the West Midlands. Area, 35, 6–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, W., & Evers, D. (2014). Dutch national spatial planning at the end of an era. In M.Reimer, P.Getimis, & H.Blotevogel (Eds.), Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe; A comparative perspective on continuity and changes (pp. 61–82). New York/Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, W., & Spaans, M. (Eds.). (2012). RISE Regional Integrated Strategies in Europe: Annex 1 to the Final Report: Literature review, ESPON, targeted analysis 2013/2/11. Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar