3,809
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Comment

The challenges of the “material turn” for planning studies

References

  • Boelens, L. (2010). Theorizing practice and practising theory: outlines for an actor-relational-approach in planning. Planning Theory, 9, 28–62.
  • Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2005). Peripheral vision: Economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26, 1229–1250.
  • Collinge, C. (2006). Flat ontology and the deconstruction of scale: A response to Marston, Jones and Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31, 244–251.
  • DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society. London: Continuum.
  • de Roo, G., Hillier, J., & Van Wezemael, J. (Eds.). (2012). Complexity and planning: Systems, assemblages and simulations. Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Farias, I. (2009). Introduction. In I.Farias & T.Bender (Eds.), Urban assemblages: How actor-network theory changes urban studies (pp. 1–24). London: Routledge.
  • Farias, I., & Bender, T. (Eds.). (2009). Urban assemblages: How actor-network theory changes urban studies. London: Routledge.
  • Gerrits, L., & Teisman, G. (2012). Co-evolutionary planning processes. In G.de Roo, J.Hillier, & J.van Wezemael (Eds.), Complexity and planning: Systems, assemblages and simulations (pp. 199–219). Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Healey, P. (1987). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan.
  • Healey, P. (2006). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave.
  • Hillier, J. (2012). Baroque complexity: ‘If things were simple, word would have gotten round’. In G.de Roo, J.Hillier, & J.van Wezemael (Eds.), Complexity and planning: Systems, assemblages and simulations (pp. 38–73). Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Hommels, A. (2005). Unbuilding cities: Obduracy in urban socio-technical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern(C. Porter Trans.). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: OUP.
  • Marston, S. A., Jones, J. P., & Woodward, K. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, 416–432.
  • Portugali, J. (2012). Complexity theories of cities: First, second or third culture of planning? In G.de Roo, J.Hillier, & J.van Wezemael (Eds.), Complexity and planning: Systems, assemblages and simulations (pp. 117–140). Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Purcell, M. (2013). A new land: Deleuze and Guattari and planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 14, 20–38.
  • Rydin, Y. (2013). The issue network of zero-carbon built environments: A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Environmental Politics, 22, 496–517.
  • Wagenaar, H. (2007). Governance, complexity, and democratic participation: How citizens and public officials harness the complexities of neighborhood decline. The American Review of Public Administration, 37, 17–50.