The transformative potential of civic enterprise

References

• Amin, A., Cameron, A., & Hudson, R. (2002). Placing the social economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Avritzer, L. (2002). Democracy and the public space in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boontje, P. S. (2013). Empowering the next generation: A German wind & solar energy cooperatives business model research. Unpublished Master Dissertation, Delft University of Technology
   Google Scholar
• Boyte, H. C. (2004). Everyday politics. Reconnecting citizens and public life. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2006). American nightmare: Neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and de-democratization. Political Theory, 34, 690–714. doi: 10.1177/0090591706293016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Cowie, P. (2013). Are English neighbourhood forums democratically legitimate? Planning Theory & Practice, 14, 562–566. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2013.851880.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Madanipour, A. (2015). Reconsidering localism. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, A. (2009). The well-connected community: A networking approach to community development. Bristol: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2015). Civil society enterprise and local development Planning Theory & Practice, 16, 11–27. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2014.995212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. (1994). Associative democracy. New forms of economic and social governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Gonzalez, S. (2013). Can neighbourhoods save the city: Community development and social innovation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L., Martí-Costa, M., Torvà, M. D., Cohen-Bar, E., Ronel, A., Rogers, D., … de Hoop, H. (2013). Finding hope in unpromising times: stories of progressive planning alternatives for a world in crisis/neoliberal planning is not the only way: Mapping the regressive tendencies of planning practice/Can Batlló: Sustaining an insurgent urbanism/dynamic planning initiated by residents: Implementable plans for the informal built urban fabric of the Palestinian neighbourhoods of East Jerusalem/Redwatch: Monitory democracy as a radical approach to citizen participation in planning/making space for public ownership: the re-municipalisation of public services through grassroots struggle and local state action/”neighbourhood inquiry”: For a post-political politics/looking inwards: Extended family living as an urban consolidation alternative/grow your own. Planning Theory & Practice 14, 529–529. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2013.853470.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez Bajo, C., & Roelants, B. (2013). Capital and the debt trap. Learning from cooperatives in the global crisis 2013. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. (2013). Gekaufte Zeit. Die vertagte Krise des demokratischen Kapitalismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ooijen, D. (2013, May 1). An overview of Dutch examples of citizen initiatives Paper presented to the Seminar Civic Enterprise, Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., & van der Heijden, J. (2015). The promise of democracy? Civic enterprise, localism and the transformation of democratic capitalism S. Davoudi & A. Madanipour (Eds.), Reconsidering localism (pp. 126–147). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (2014). Governance-driven democratization. In S. Griggs, A. Norval, & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Practices of freedom: Governance, conflict and participation in decentered governance (pp. 38–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (2004). The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recognition. In R. Vijayendra & M. Walton (Eds.), Culture and Public Action (pp. 59–84). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. 2009. “An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy”. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/pdf/report_barca_v0306.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bifulco, L., Mozzana, C., & Monteleone, R. (2015). Capabilities for voice, work and education: Critical analysis of programmes for disadvantaged young people in Europe. In Hans-Uwe Otto, et al. (Eds.), Facing trajectories from school to work – Towards a capability-friendly youth policy in Europe (pp. 201–357). Cham (Switzerland): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cavola, L., di Martino, P., & de Muro, P. (2010). How to make neighbourhoods act? The Associazione Quartieri Spagnoli in Naples. In F. Moulaert, F. Martinelli, E. Swyngedouw & S. Gonzalez (Eds.), Can neighbourhoods save the city? (pp. 93–104). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fondazione di Comunità di Messina (FCM)(editor) (2014). Sviluppo è coesione e libertà. Il caso del Distretto Sociale Evoluto di Messina. Milan: Horcynus editore.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2004). Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laino, G. (2012). Il fuoco nel cuore e il diavolo in corpo. La partecipazione come attivazione sociale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
   Google Scholar
• Loffredo, A. (2014). Noi del Rione Sanità, La scommessa di un parroco e dei suoi ragazzi Milano: Mondadori.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, N. (2012). The role, organisation and contribution of community enterprise to urban regeneration policy in the UK. Progress in Planning, 77 (1), 1–35. 10.1016/j.progress.2011.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Cowie, P. (2013). Are English neighbourhood forums democratically legitimate? Planning Theory & Practice, 14, 562–566. 10.1080/14649357.2013.851880
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, S., & Vigar, G. (2010). The Ouseburn Trust in Newcastle: A struggle to innovate in the context of a weak local state In F. Moulaert, F. Martinelli, E. Swyngedouw, & S. Gonzalez (Eds.), Can neighbourhoods save the city? (pp. 128–140. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2015). Civil society enterprise and local development Planning. Theory & Practice, 16, 11–27. 10.1080/14649357.2014.995212
   Google Scholar
• Altrock, U., & Huning, S. (2015). Cultural interventions in urban public spaces and performative planning: Insights from shrinking cities in Eastern Germany In C. Tornaghi & S. Knierbein (Eds.), Public space and relational perspectives: New challenges for architecture and planning (pp. 148–166). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benze, A. (2014). Informelle Raumtaktiken in der Stadtregion. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 2, 143–146.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. H. W. (2015). Grassroots innovation for urban sustainability: Comparing the diffusion pathways of three ecovillage projects. Environment and Planning. A, 47, 320–337. doi:10.1068/a140250p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christmann, G. B., Ibert, O., Jessen, J., & Walther U. -J. (2015). Wie kommt Neuartiges in die räumliche Planung? Konzeptionierung von Innovationen in der Planung und Forschungsstrategien. In M. Hutter, H. Knoblauch, W. Rammert, & A. Windeler (Eds.), Perspektiven auf die Innovationsgesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Happes, W. (2014). Vereinsstatistik. Konstanz: V & M Service GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, M. (2000). The change agent Reid. In B. J. Foster W. (Ed.), Achieving cultural change in networked libraries (pp. 105–117). Farnham: Gower Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Honeck, T. (2012). Wohnen anders als gewohnt. Urban Cohousing im Spannungsfeld persönlicher Wohnansprüche und nachhaltiger Entwicklung ( Unpublished master’s thesis) University of Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Honeck, T. (2015). Zwischennutzung als soziale Innovation. Von alternativen Lebensentwürfen zu Verfahren der räumlichen. Planung Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 3, 219–231.
   Google Scholar
• Overmeyer, K., & Buttenberg, L. (2014). Raumunternehmen zwischen informeller Aktivierung und formeller. Planung Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 2, 135–142.
   Google Scholar
• Rammert, W. (2010). Die Innovationen der Gesellschaft. In J. Howaldt & H. Jacobsen (Eds.), Soziale innovation. Auf dem Weg zu einem postindustriellen Innovationsparadigma (pp. 21–51). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Baeck, P., Collins, L., & Zhang, B. (2014). Understanding alternative finance -The UK alternative finance industry report 2014. London: Nesta, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Beunderman, J., Ahrensbach, T., Fung, A., Johar, I., & Stonar, J. (2011). Compendium for the civic economy. London: OO/Research, with Nesta and Design Council CABE.
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Government. (2013). Can big society capital succeed? Institute for Government blog. Retrieved 19, March 2015, from http://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/blog/5633/can-big-society-capital-succeed/
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, C., Dowrick, C., Payne, S., Hanratty, B., Irwin, P., Neary, D., Richardson, D. (2013). Men’s Sheds and other gendered interventions for older men: Improving health and wellbeing through social activity - A systematic review and scoping of the evidence base 2013. Lancaster: Lancaster University Centre for Ageing Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems American Economic Review, 100, 641–672.
   Google Scholar
• Pentland, A. (2014). Social physics: How good ideas spread -the lessons from a new science 2014. London: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. (2015). Evaluation Foundations Revisited:Cultivating the life of the Mind for Practice. Paolo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shanmugalingam, C., Graham, J., Tucker, S., Mulgan, G. (2011). Growing social ventures 2011 London: Young Foundation
   Google Scholar
• Social Impact Investment Taskforce. (2014) Impact Investment: The invisible heart of markets 2014. London: Social Impact Investment Taskforce.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R., & Cohen, M. D. (2000). Harnessing complexity. Organizational implications of a scientific frontier 2000. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Beunderman, J. (2011). Compendium for the civic economy. What our cities, towns and neighborhoods should learn from 25 trailblazers. London: OO.
   Google Scholar
• Boontje, P. S. (2013). Empowering the Next Generation: A German wind & solar energy cooperatives business model research. Unpublished Master Dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos. Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution 2015. New York, NY: Zoen Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, R., & O’Neill, D. (2013). Enough is enough. Building a sustainable economy in a world of finite resources 2013. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2007). Why we hate politics 2007. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. (1994). Associative democracy. New forms of economic and social governance 1994. Cambridge: Polity Press
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E. I. (2002). Being political. Genealogies of citizenship 2002. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirofski, P. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit 2011. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pharr, S. J., & Putnam, R. D. (2000). Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries 2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez Bajo, & C. Roelants, B. (2013). Capital and the debt trap. Learning from cooperatives in the global crisis 2013. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. (2013). Gekaufte Zeit. Die Vertagte Krise des Demokratischen Kapitalismus 2013. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Teulings, C., & Baldwin, R. (2014). Secular stagnation: Facts, causes and cures 2014. London: CEPR.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, J. (2008). Public philosophy in a new key. Vol. 1. Democracy and civic freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. (2014). The agonistic experience: Informality, hegemony and the prospects for democratic governance. In S. Griggs, A. Norval, & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Practices of freedom: Democracy, conflict and participation in decentred governance 2014 (pp. 217–248). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar H. (forthcoming). Democratic transfer: Everyday neoliberalism, hegemony and the prospects for democratic renewal. In J. Edelenbos & I. van Meerkerk (Eds.), Critical reflections on interactive governance under review. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., & van der Heijden, J. (2015). The promise of democracy? Civic enterprise, localism and the transformation of democratic capitalism. In S. Davoudi & A. Madanipour Reconsidering localism 2015 (pp. 126–147). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar