The use of state-of-the-art transport models by policymakers – beauty in simplicity?

References

• Amara, N., Ouimet, M., & Landry, R. (2004). New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of University Research in Government Agencies. Science Communication, 26, 75–106.10.1177/1075547004267491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390–1396.10.1126/science.7466396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, K., Blandford, B., & Ripy, T. G. J. (2011). Planning, technology, and legitimacy: structured public involvement in integrated transportation and land-use planning in the United States. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38, 447–467.10.1068/b35128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D., & Hickman, R. (2013). Transport futures: Thinking the unthinkable. Transport Policy, 29, 283–293.10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukers, E., Bertollini, L., & Te Brommelstroet, M. (2012). Why cost benefit analysis is perceived as a problematic tool for assessment of transport plans: A process perspective. Transportation Research Part A, 46, 68–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., & Koppelman, F. S. (1999). A retrospective and prospective survey of time-use research. Transportation, 26, 119–139.10.1023/A:1005196331393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, D., & Williams, H. (2015). Forecasting urban travel: Past, Present and Future. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781784713591
   Google Scholar
• Brömmelstroet, M., & Bertollini, L. (2011). The role of transport-related models in urban planning practice. Transport Reviews, 31, 139–143.10.1080/01441647.2010.541295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruun, E., & Givoni, M. (2015). Six research routes to steer transport policy. Nature, 523, 29–31.10.1038/523029a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, K., & Benson, B. (2013). Handling biases in forecasting when transportation policy-making. In T. Vanoutrive, & A. Verhetsel (Eds.), Smart transport networks: Decision making, sustainability and market structure (pp. 49–67). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781782548331
   Google Scholar
• Carlson T. R., Dulla, R. G., Kuzmyak, J. R., & Porter, C. D. (2005) COMMUTER model v2.0- User manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 420-B-05-017.
   Google Scholar
• Cascetta, E. (2009). Transportation systems analysis models and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-75857-2
   Google Scholar
• Chow, J. Y. J., Jayakrishnan, R., & Mahmassani, H. S. (2012) Beyond the four step model: developing curricula for advanced travel models. Resource paper of the International Association for Travel Behaviour Research (IATBR).
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, C. (2011). Integrating land use with public transport: The use of a discursive accessibility tool to inform metropolitan spatial planning in Perth. Transport Reviews, 31, 179–197.10.1080/01441647.2010.525330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, W., Donnelly, R., Vovsha, P., Freedmani, J., Ruegg, S., Hicks, J., Castiglione, J., & Picado, R. (2007). Synthesis of first practices and operational research approaches in activity-based travel demand modelling. Transportation Research Part A, 41, 464–488.
   Google Scholar
• Dft (Department for Transport). (2009). Guidance on Local Transport Plans. DfT, July. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110509101621/http:/www.dft.gov.uk/adobepdf/165237/ltp-guidance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dft (Department for Transport). (2015). About us. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-transport/about
   Google Scholar
• Dobbs, R., Pohl, H., Lin, D-Y., Mischke, J., Garemo, N., Hexter, J., Matzinger, S., Palter, R., & Nanavatty, R. (2013) Infrastructure productivity: How to save $1 trillion a year. McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/engineering_construction/infrastructure_productivity
   Google Scholar
• Dudley, G., & Preston, J. (2013). Historical narrative and the evolution of academic Transport Studies in the UK. Transport Reviews, 33, 131–147.10.1080/01441647.2013.784375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulias, K. G., Kim, T., Patten, M. (2004). On activity type classification and issues related to the with whom and for whom questions of an activity diary: preliminary findings and pattern classification. Paper presented at the conference on progress in activity-based analysis, May 28–31, Vaeshastel Castle, 753 Maastricht, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson, H. (2011). Analysing models as a knowledge technology in transport planning. Transport Reviews, 31, 145–159.10.1080/01441647.2010.532884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzopoulou, M., & Miller, E. J. (2009). Transport policy evaluation in metropolitan areas: The role of modelling in decision-making. Transportation Research Part A, 43, 323–338.
   Google Scholar
• Hatzopoulou, M., Hao, J. Y., & Miller, E. J. (2011). Simulating the impacts of household travel on greenhouse gas emissions, urban air quality, and population exposure. Transportation, 38, 871–887.10.1007/s11116-011-9362-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inro. (2011). Inro – Emme. Retrieved from http://www.inro.ca/en/products/emme/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Ito, G., & Yamakage, S. (2015). From KISS to TASS modeling: A preliminary analysis of the segregation model incorporated with spatial data on Chicago. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 16, 553–573.10.1017/S1468109915000304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, D., Berglund, S., Amström, P., & Algers, S. (2011). The usefulness of transport models in Swedish planning practice. Transport Reviews, 31, 251–265.10.1080/01441647.2010.537100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khademia, E., & Timmermans, H. (2011). Incorporating traveler response to pricing policies in comprehensive activity-based models of transport demand: Literature review and conceptualisation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 594–603.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.066
   Google Scholar
• Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2001). Climbing the ladder of research utilization evidence from social science research. Science Communication, 22, 396–422.10.1177/1075547001022004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. B. (1973). Requiem for large-scale models. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 39, 163–178.10.1080/01944367308977851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. B. (1994). Retrospective on large-scale urban models. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60, 35–40.10.1080/01944369408975549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, A. D. (2005). Developing sustainable urban land use and transport strategies: a decision-makers’ guidebook. Leeds University, Institute for Transport Studies. Retrieved from www.konsult.leeds.ac.uk.
   Google Scholar
• May, A. D., Page, M., & Hull, A. (2008). Developing a set of decision-support tools for sustainable urban transport in the UK. Transport Policy, 15, 328–340.10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, G., & Richardson, K. A. (2007). Systems thinking for community involvement in policy analysis. Emergence-Mahwah-Lawrence Erlbaum, 9, 167–183.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2011). The third Limfjord crossing: a case of pessimism bias and knowledge filtering. Transport Reviews, 31, 231–249.10.1080/01441647.2010.534569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ney, S. (2009). Resolving messy policy problems: Handling conflict in environmental, transport, health and ageing policy. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, D. B. (2013). What’s between KISS and KIDS: A Keep It Knowledgeable (KIKS) principle for cognitive agent design. Integrated Cognition AAAI Technical Report FS-13-03: 63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Ortuzar, J. de D., & Wilumsen, L. G. (2001). Modeling transport (3rd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, B. M., Vovsha, P., Hicks, J. E., Livshits, V., & Pendyala, R. M. (2013). Extension of the activity-based modeling approach to incorporate supply side of activities: Examples for major universities and special events. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Pereria, A. G., & Corral, Q. S. (2002). From technocratic to participatory decision support systems: Responding to the new Governance initiatives. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, 6, 95–107.
   Google Scholar
• Pfaffenbichler, P. (2011). Modelling with systems dynamics as a method to bridge the gap between politics, planning and science? Lessons learnt from the development of the land use and transport model MARS. Transport Reviews, 31, 267–289.10.1080/01441647.2010.534570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polydoropoulou, A., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2000). Combined RP/SP nested logit access/mode choice model for multiple mass transit technologies. Transportation Research Record, 1771, 38–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, R. F. (1997). Measuring knowledge utilization: Process and outcomes. Knowledge and Policy. The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization, 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SATURN. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.saturnsoftware.co.uk/7.html
   Google Scholar
• Schofer, J. L. (2007). Information assets to support transportation decision making. Report of a Peer Exchange of State Transportation Organizations, Kansas City, April 17–18, 2007, Transportation Research Circular, Number E-C121.
   Google Scholar
• Shiftan, Y. (2000). The advantage of activity-based modeling for air quality purposes: Theory versus practice and future needs. Innovations, 13, 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Shiftan, Y., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2011). A practical policy-sensitive, activity-based, travel-demand model. The Annals of Regional Science, 47, 517–541.10.1007/s00168-010-0393-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiftan, Y., & Suhrbier, J. (2002). The analysis of travel and emission impacts of travel demand management strategies using activity-based models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Transportation, 29, 145–168.
   Google Scholar
• Shiftan, Y., Kheifits, L., & Sorani, M. (2015). The impact of various sustainable transportation policies on travel and emissions using activity-based modelling. Transportation Research Record, the Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2531, 93–102.
   Google Scholar
• Sosslau, A. B., Hassam, A. B., Carter, M. M., Wickstrom, G. V. (1978). Quick response urban travel estimation techniques and transferable Parameters. NCHRP Report No.187, TRB 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., & O’Connor, W. (2003). Analysis: Practices, principles and processes. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 77–109). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Talvitie, A. (2011). The problem of trust in planning. Planning Theory, 11, 257–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TSU. (2010). Intra-SIM. Retrieved from http://www.tsu.ox.ac.uk/research/intra-sim/
   Google Scholar
• Vickerman, R. (2008). Models in policy and policy in models: Integrating decision making. In M. Ben-Akiva, H. Meersman, & E. Van de Voorde (Eds.), Recent developments in transport modelling: Lessons for the freight sector (pp. 205–218). Emerald: Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• VISSIM. (2016). Traffic simulation with PTV Vissim for efficent junction design. http://vision-traffic.ptvgroup.com/en-uk/products/ptv-vissim/
   Google Scholar
• Vonk, G., Geertman, S., & Schot, P. (2005). Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems. Environment and Planning A, 37, 909–924.10.1068/a3712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vovsha, P., & Bradley, M. (2006). Advanced activity-based models in context of planning decisions, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1981, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Worsley, T., & Mackie, P. (2015). Transport policy, appraisal and decision-making. RAC Foundation, May. Retrieved from http://www.racfoundation.org/assets/rac_foundation/content/downloadables/Transport_policy_appraisal_decision_making_worsley_mackie_May_2015_final_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research applied social research methods series (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar