Sustaining area-based initiatives by developing appropriate “anchors”: the role of social capital

References

• Agger, A., & Jensen, J.O. (2015). Area-based initiatives – and their work in bonding, bridging and linking social capital. European Planning Studies, 23, 2045–2061.10.1080/09654313.2014.998172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agger, A., & Löfgren, K. (2008). Democratic assesment of collaborative planning processes. Planning Theory, 7, 145–164.10.1177/1473095208090432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, A., & O’Shea, M. (2012). “You only get back what you put in”: Perceptions of professional sport organizations as community anchors. Community Development, 43, 656–676.10.1080/15575330.2011.645048
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. (2008). European urban policies and the neighbourhood: An overview. Proceedings of the ICE - Urban Design and Planning, 161, 115–122.10.1680/udap.2008.161.3.115
   Google Scholar
• Baerenholdt, J.O., & Aarsaether, N. (2002). Coping strategies, social capital and space. European Urban and Regional Studies, 9, 151–165.10.1177/096977640200900204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjødstrup, A. (2014). Balancing diversity in urban public space planning-A case study of the potential for integration through public spaces in the Sundholm Quarter. ( Master’s Thesis). University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, P. (1999). Reflections on homelessness as seen from an institution for the homeless in Copenhagen. In Feantsa & I. Dragana Avramov (Eds.) Coping with Homelessness. (pp. 510–526). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Burgers, J. & Vranken, J. (2004). How to male a successful urban development programme - experiences from nine European countries. Garant: Antwerpen & Apeldoorn.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. (2006). Addressing Europe’s urban challenges: Lessons from the EU URBAN community initiative. Urban Studies, 43, 2145–2162.10.1080/00420980600990456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clopton, A., & Finch, B. (2011). Re-conceptualizing social anchors in community development: Utilizing social anchor theory to create social capital’s third dimension. Community Development, 42, 70–83.10.1080/15575330.2010.505293
   Google Scholar
• De Decker, P. (2003). On the origins of urban development programmes in nine European countries (Vol. 2). Garant: Antwerp & Appeldorn
   Google Scholar
• Firth, C., Maye, D., & Pearson, D. (2011). Developing “Community” in community gardens. Local Environment, 16, 555–568.10.1080/13549839.2011.586025
   Google Scholar
• Foord, J., Ginsburg, N., Boddy, M., & Parkinson, M. (2004). Whose hidden assets? Inner city potential for social cohesion and economic competitiveness. In M. Boody, & M. Parkinson (Eds.), City matters competitiveness, cohesion and urban governance (pp. 287–306). Bristol: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodlad, R., Burton, P., & Croft, J. (2005). Effectiveness at what? The processes and impact of community involvement in area-based initiatives. Environment & Planning C: Government & Policy, 23, 923–938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. (2005). Social capital. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. (2015). Community Anchors. Think Piece, What Works Scotland, Retrieved from http://whatworksscotland.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/WWSthinkpiece-Community-Anchors-Nov151.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, E.H., & Munk, A. (Eds.). (2007). Kvarterløft 10 years of urban regeneration. Copenhagen: The Ministry of Refugees, Immigration and Integration Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, N., & Rydin, Y. (2013). What can social capital tell us about planning under localism? Local Government Studies, 39, 71–88.10.1080/03003930.2012.675330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulgard, L., & Bisballe, T. (2003). Governance og social kapital [Governance and social capital]. In K. Sehested (Ed.), Bypolitik - mellem hierarki og netværk. (pp. 95–129). Copenhagen: Akademisk forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., Hambleton, R., & Stewart, M. (2004). Leadership and partnership in urban governance: Evidence from London, Bristol and Glasgow. In M. Boddy, & M. Parkinson (Eds.), City matters competitiveness, cohesion and urban governance (pp. 349–366). Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R., & Novy, A. (2013). Cooperative housing and social cohesion: The role of linking social capital. European Planning Studies, 22, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. N., & Engberg, L. A. (2011). Organisational change and knowledge management in urban regeneration planning. Tidsskrift for Kortlægning Og Arealforvaltning, 46, 114–126.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, P., & Pearson, S. (2012). Outcomes from community engagement in urban regeneration: Evidence from England’s new deal for communities programme. Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 509–527.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, W., Smith, G., & Stoker, G. (2000). Social capital and urban governance: Adding a more contextualized “top-down”perspective. Political Studies, 48, 802–820.10.1111/1467-9248.00284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Municipality, C. (2012). Integrated urban renewal in copenhagen 2012. Retrieved from http://kk.sites.itera.dk/apps/kk_publikationer/index.asp?mode=detalje&id=870
   Google Scholar
• Parés, M., Bonet-Martí, J., & Martí-Costa, M. (2012). Does participation really matter in urban regeneration policies? Exploring governance networks in Catalonia (Spain). Urban Affairs Review, 48, 238–271.10.1177/1078087411423352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America′s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 5, 65–78.10.1353/jod.1995.0002
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J., Tyler, P., & Brennan, A. (2005). Assessing the effect of area based initiatives on local area outcomes: some thoughts based on the national evaluation of the single regeneration budget in England. Urban Studies, 42, 1919.10.1080/00420980500280347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., & Holman, N. (2004). Re-evaluating the contribution of social capital in achieving sustainable development. Local Environment, 9, 117–133.10.1080/1354983042000199561
   Google Scholar
• Savini, F. (2010). The endowment of community participation: institutional settings in two urban regeneration projects. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35, 949–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social response. (2014). Fortællinger fra et områdeløft – og anbefalinger til arbejdet med netværksbaseret byudvikling. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/sofiebwinther/docs/fort__llinger_fra_et_omr__del__ft
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen, G. T., & Svendsen, G. L. H. (2009). Handbook of social capital: The troika of sociology, political science and economics. Cheltenham & Norhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781848447486
   Google Scholar
• Szreter, S. (2002). The state of social capital: Bringing back in power, politics, and history. Theory and Society, 31, 573–621.10.1023/A:1021300217590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szreter, S., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33, 650–667.10.1093/ije/dyh013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unified Plan. (2008) Boligsocial Helhedsplan for Sundholmskvarteret. Retrieved from http://www.vibo.dk/vibo/docs/department/Sundholmsvej.pdf
   Google Scholar
• USER, (2012). Changes and conflicts in using public spaces, Base line Study URBACT II. Retrieved from http://urbact.eu/fileadmin/Projects/USER/outputs_media/baselineUSER_01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Gent, Wouter. P. C. & Musterd, S., & Ostendorf, W. (2009). Disentangling neighbourhood problems: Area-based interventions in Western European cities. Urban Research and Practice, 2, 53–67.
   Google Scholar