Pedestrian planning and the challenges of instrumental rationality in transport planning: emerging strategies in three Swedish municipalities

References

• Aldred, R. (2014). A matter of utility? Rationalising cycling, cycling rationalities. Mobilities, 10(5), 1–20. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2014.935149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. (2009). Planning theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2002). The communicative turn in urban planning: Unravelling paradigmatic, imperialistic and moralistic dimensions. Space and Polity, 6, 5–24. doi:10.1080/13562570220137871
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. (2006). From traffic regulation to limited ways: The effort to build a science of transportation planning. Journal of Planning History, 5, 3–34. doi:10.1177/1538513205284628
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Morris, E., & Taylor, B. (2009). Planning for cars in cities: Planners, engineers, and freeways in the 20th century. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75, 161–177. doi:10.1080/01944360802640016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, L. (1996). On the treatment of flow in traffic safety analysis,-a non-parametric approach applied on vulnerable road users. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 313–343. 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban Design, 14, 65–84. doi:10.1080/13574800802451155
   Google Scholar
• Furness, Z. (2010). One less car: Bicycling and the politics of automobility. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gartman, D. (2004). Three ages of the automobile the cultural logics of the car. Theory, Culture & Society, 21, 169–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helsingborg Munipality. (2010). ÖP2010 En strategisk översiktsplan för Helsingborg [ÖP2010 A strategic municipal development plan for Helsingborg].
   Google Scholar
• Helsingborg Municipality. (2014). Trafikprogram för Helsingborg [Transport strategy for Helsingborg].
   Google Scholar
• Hrelja, R. (2015). Integrating transport and land-use planning? How steering cultures in local authorities affect implementation of integrated public transport and land-use planning. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. 10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, A. (2008). Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities? Transport Policy, 15, 94–103. 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley, M., & Yiftachel, O. (2000). New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, 333–342. 10.1177/0739456X0001900402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono, M., Krizek, K. J., & El-Geneidy, A. (2010). Measuring non-motorized accessibility: Issues, alternatives, and execution. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, F. (2013). Microscopic modeling and simulation of pedestrian traffic. Norrköping: Linköping University. 10.3384/lic.diva-101085
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, T., Koglin, T., Lindelöw, D., & Nilsson, A. (2011). Effektsamband för gående och cyklisters säkerhet-litteraturstudie [Magnitude of effects regarding measures for traffic safety for pedestrians and cyclists - a literature review]. Bulletin 260/3000. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, L., & Del Mistro, R. (2003). Changes in transport planning policy: Changes in transport planning methodology? Transportation, 30, 113–131. 10.1023/A:1022562125856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärrholm, M., Johansson, M., Lindelöw, D., & Ferreira, I. A. (2014). Interseriality and different sorts of walking: Suggestions for a relational approach to urban walking. Mobilities, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2014.969596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koglin, T. (2013). Vélomobility-A critical analysis of planning and space. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Koglin, T., & Rye, T. (2014). The marginalisation of bicycling in modernist urban transport planning. Journal of Transport & Health, 1, 214–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, G. (2006). Spatial planning systems in Western Europe: An overview. Amsterdam: Ios Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lauria, M. (2010). Does planning theory affect practice, and if so, how? Planning Theory, 9, 156–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, H. (2003). Testing the claims of new urbanism: Local access, pedestrian travel, and neighboring behaviors. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 414–429. 10.1080/01944360308976328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund Municipality. (2010). ÖP2010 Översiktsplan för Lunds kommun [Municipal development plan for Lund].
   Google Scholar
• Lund Municipality. (2015). Lunds fotgängarstrategi 2014-2018 [Lund’s pedestrian strategy 2014-2018].
   Google Scholar
• Lundin, P. (2008). Bilsamhället : Ideologi, expertis och regelskapande i efterkrigstidens Sverige [The car society: Ideology, expertise and rule-making in post-war Sweden]. Stockholm: Stockholmia förlag.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, D., & Hopkins, D. (2011). The changing discourse of city plans: Rationalities of planning in Perth, 1955–2010. Planning Theory & Practice, 12, 485–510. doi:10.1080/14649357.2011.626313
   Google Scholar
• Malmö Municipality. (2012a). Fotgängarprogram 2012-2018 [Pedestrian strategy 2012-2018].
   Google Scholar
• Malmö Municipality. (2012b). Översiktsplan för Malmö - Planstrategi [Municipal development plan for Malmö - Planning strategy].
   Google Scholar
• Manderscheid, K. (2016). Quantifying mobilities? Reflections on a neglected method in mobilities research. Applied Mobilities, 1, 43–55. doi:10.1080/23800127.2016.1147752
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. (2002 [1964]). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society, 2nd edition. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. (2004). Streets and patterns. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. London: Sage Publications, Inc Pages.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, J. (2010). Sense and the city: Exploring the embodied geographies of urban walking. Social & Cultural Geography, 11, 575–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, J. (2011). “I’m on autopilot, I just follow the route”: Exploring the habits, routines, and decision-making practices of everyday urban mobilities. Environment and Planning-Part A, 43, 2857–2877. 10.1068/a43600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, L. (2013). Gångbar stad Att skapa nät för gående [Walkable city. Creating a street network for pedestrians]. Stockholm: Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions.
   Google Scholar
• Niska, A., Nilsson, A., Varedian, M., Eriksson, J., & Söderström, L. (2012). Uppföljning av gång-och cykeltrafik: utveckling av en harmoniserad metod för kommunal uppföljning av gång-respektive cykeltrafik med hjälp av resvaneundersökningar och cykelflödesmätningar [Monitoring walking and cycling: developing a harmonised method for municipal monitoring of walking and biking based on travel surveys and cycling volume counts]. Linköping: VTI Rapport.
   Google Scholar
• Öberg, G., Nilsson, G., Velin, H., Wretling, P., Berntman, M., Brundell-Freij, K., … Ståhl, A. (1996). Fotgängares och cyklisters singelolyckor [Single accidents among pedestrians and cyclists]. Linköping: VTI meddelande 799.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S. (1995). From ‘predict and provide’ to ‘predict and prevent’?: Pricing and planning in transport policy. Transport Policy, 2, 43–49. doi:10.1016/0967-070X(95)93245-T
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. (2007). Automobile politics: Ecology and cultural political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Pr.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, J. W. (2007). A pedestrian world: Competing rationalities and the calculation of transportation change. Environment and Planning A, 39, 928–944. 10.1068/a389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, C. (2013). Deliberation or doctrine? Land use and spatial planning for sustainable development in Sweden. Land Use Policy, 34, 301–313. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, T. M. (1992). Quantification and the accounting ideal in science. Social Studies of Science, 22, 633–651. doi:10.1177/030631292022004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefelbusch, M. (2010). Rational planning for emotional mobility? The case of public transport development. Planning theory, 9, 200–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seedat, M., MacKenzie, S., & Mohan, D. (2006). The phenomenology of being a female pedestrian in an African and an Asian city: A qualitative investigation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9, 139–153. 10.1016/j.trf.2005.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2000). The city and the car. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24, 737–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southworth, M. (2005). Designing the walkable city. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 131, 246–257. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005) 131:4(246).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ståhl, A., Carlsson, G., Hovbrandt, P., & Iwarsson, S. (2008). “Let’s go for a walk!”: Identification and prioritisation of accessibility and safety measures involving elderly people in a residential area. European Journal of Ageing, 5, 265–273. 10.1007/s10433-008-0091-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ståhle, A., Marcus, L., & Karlström, A. (2005). Place syntax: Geographic accessibility with axial lines in GIS. Paper presented at the Proceedings, Fifth international space syntax symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Stangl, P. (2008). Evaluating the pedestrian realm: Instrumental rationality, communicative rationality and phenomenology. Transportation, 35, 759–775. doi:10.1007/s11116-008-9175-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. (2014). Statistikdatabasen [The statistical database]. Retrieved October 15, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sundquist, K., Eriksson, U., Kawakami, N., Skog, L., Ohlsson, H., & Arvidsson, D. (2011). Neighborhood walkability, physical activity, and walking behavior: The Swedish Neighborhood and Physical Activity (SNAP) study. Social Science & Medicine, 72, 1266–1273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Planning and Building Act. (2010). 900 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Te Brömmelstroet, M., & Bertolini, L. (2010). Integrating land use and transport knowledge in strategy-making. Transportation, 37, 85–104. doi:10.1007/s11116-009-9221-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, A., & Wolfe, J. M. (1991). Discourse analysis and city plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 10, 195–200. doi:10.1177/0739456x9101000306
   Google Scholar
• Thoresson, K. (2011). Att beräkna det goda samhället: Samhällsekonomiska analyser och gränslandet expertis–politik inom transportområdet [To calculate the good society: Cost-benefit analysis and the border between expertise and policy in the transport sector]. Linköping: Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2004). The ‘system’ of automobility. Theory, Culture & Society, 21, 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelij, J. (2015). Is planning theory really open for planning practice? Planning Theory & Practice, 16, 128–132. doi:10.1080/14649357.2015.1004901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl, C., & Ullberg, M. (2014). Resvaneundersökning i Skåne 2013 [Travel survey in Scania 2013]. Malmö: Sweco.
   Google Scholar
• Wennberg, H., Ståhl, A., & Hydén, C. (2009). Older pedestrians’ perceptions of the outdoor environment in a year-round perspective. European Journal of Ageing, 6, 277–290. doi:10.1007/s10433-009-0123-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. (1988). The transformation of expertise by new knowledge: Contingencies and limits to skill scientification. Social Science Information, 27, 391–420. doi:10.1177/053901888027003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willson, R. (2001). Assessing communicative rationality as a transportation planning paradigm. Transportation, 28(1), 1–31. doi:10.1023/a:1005247430522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willson, R., Payne, M., & Smith, E. (2003). Does discussion enhance rationality? A report from transportation planning practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 354–367. doi:10.1080/01944360308976324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanon, B. (2014). Planners’ technical expertise: Changing paradigms and practices in the Italian experience. Planning Practice and Research, 29, 75–95. 10.1080/02697459.2013.872907
   Google Scholar