Reimagining planning: moving from reflective practice to deliberative practice - a first exploration in the Italian context

References

• Baum, H. (1983). Planners and public expectations. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). La Misère du monde [The misery of the world]. Paris: Edition du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, R. (1972). Farewell to the south. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Crosta, P. L. (2010). Pratiche. Il territorio ‘è l’uso che se ne fa’ [Practices: Territory is what one makes of it]. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
   Google Scholar
• De Leo, D. (2008). Profili di planner nell’informazionale [Profile of planners in the information age]. Roma: Aracne.
   Google Scholar
• De Leo, D. (2013). Planner in palestina. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
   Google Scholar
• De Leo, D., & Forester, J. (2017). Changing cities, reimagining planning.Voices from the field. Rome: INU Edizioni.
   Google Scholar
• Di Biagi, P., & Gabellini, P. (1992). Urbanisti Italiani [Italian urban planners]. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. (2000). New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35, 451–478. doi:10.1177/107808740003500401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2006). Exploring urban practice in a democratizing society: Opportunities, techniques, and challenges. Development South Africa, 23, 569–586. doi:10.1080/03768350601021814
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2009). Dealing with differences. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2011). Planning’s dirty little secret and its implications: Beyond communicative planning. Planning Theory and Practice, 12, 325–328. doi:10.1080/14649357.2011.617470
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2012). Learning to improve practice. Planning Theory and Practice, 13, 11–26. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.649905
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2013). Planning in the face of conflict. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2017a). On the evolution of critical pragmatism. In T. Haselsberger (Ed.), Encounters with planning thought (pp. 280–296). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2017b). Deliberative democracy not smothering invention. In J. Dryzek, A. Bachtiger, J. Mansbridge, & M. Warren (Eds.), Oxford handbook on deliberative democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J., Fischler, R., & Shmueli, D. (Eds.). (2001). Israeli planners and designers. Albany, NY: State University Press of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Herder & Herder.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., & Underwood, J. (1979). Professional ideals and planning practice. Progress in Planning, 9, 73–127. doi:10.1016/0305-9006(78)90005-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, C. (1994). What planners do. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association/Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, E., & Kaufman, J. (1979). The ethics of contemporary American planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45: 243–255. doi.10.1080/01944367908976965
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. (1995). Planning theory’s emerging paradigm. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14, 183–189. doi:10.1177/0739456X9501400307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumholz, N., & Forester, J. (1990). Making equity planning work. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laws, D., & Forester, J. (2007). Learning in practice. Critical Policy Studies, 1, 342–370.10.1080/19460171.2007.9518526
   Google Scholar
• Laws, D., & Forester, J. (Eds.). (2015). Conflict, improvisation, governance. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., Balducci, A., & Kangasoja, J. (2011). Planning as agonistic communication in a trading zone. Planning Theory, 10, 257–272. doi:10.1177/1473095210397147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needleman, M., & Needleman, C. (1974). Guerrillas in the bureaucracy. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Saija, L., De Leo, D., & Forester, J. (2017). Learning from practice: Environmental and community mapping as participatory action research in planning. Planning Theory and Practice, 18, 127–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Song, L. (2016). Enabling transformative agency. Planning Theory and Practice, 17, 227–243. doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1158307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, C., & Tait, M. (2007). The crisis of trust and planning. Planning Theory and Practice, 8, 229–247. doi:10.1080/14649350701324458
   Google Scholar
• Terkel, S. (1974). Working. New York, NY: New Press.
   Google Scholar