Exceptional Spaces for Sustainable Living: The Regulation of One Planet Developments in the Open Countryside

References

• Anderson, J. (2017). Retreat or re-connect: How effective can ecosophical communities be in transforming the mainstream? Geografiska Annaler: Series B Human Geography, 99(2), 192–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, K., & Haggerty, K. (2005). Editorial. Doing surveillance studies. Surveillance and Society, 3(2/3), 129–138.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, K., & Phillips, A. (2004). Then and now: Planning for countryside conservation. In K. Bishop & A. Phillips (Eds.), Countryside planning: New approaches to management and conservation (pp. 1–15). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Certomà, C. (2015). Expanding the ‘dark side of planning’: Governmentality and biopolitics in urban garden planning. Planning Theory, 14(1), 23–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, N., Simmons, C., & Wackernagel, M. (2000). Sharing natures’ interest. Ecological footprints as an indicator of sustainability. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control. Crime, punishment and classification. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., & Flynn, A. (2015). The ecological footprint: New developments in policy and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality. Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government. (2012). National planning policy framework. London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Desai, P. (2010). One planet communities. A real-life guide to sustainable living. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. (2007). Environmental citizenship: Towards sustainable development. London: Wiley InterScience.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S., & Crampton, J. (2007). Introduction. Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography. In J. Crampton & S. Elden (Eds.), Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography (pp. 1–16). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Fairlie, S. (1996). Low impact development. Planning and people in a sustainable countryside. Charlbury: Jon Carpenter Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fairlie, S. (2009). Foreword. In J. Pickerill & L. Maxey (Eds.), Low impact development. The future in our hands (pp. 1–5). Leicester: Department of Geography, University of Leicester.
   Google Scholar
• Faubion, J. D. (2014). Introduction: The use of foucault. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Foucault now: Current perspectives in Foucault studies (pp. 1–20). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, A. (2010). Environmental policy. In B. Jones & P. Norton (Eds..), Politics UK (7th ed., pp. 581–613). Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., & Richardson, T. (2002). Planning and Foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning futures: New directions in planning theory (pp. 44–62). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. The Birth of the prison. Translated from the French by Alan Sheridan. First published as ‘Surveillet et Punir: naissance de la prison’ by Editions Gallimard in 1975. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991a). Questions of method. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 73–86). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991b). Politics and the study of discourse. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault (pp. 53–72). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994a). Governmentality. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault. Power. Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984 (Vol. 3, pp. 201–222). London: Penguin
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994b). Space, knowledge, and power. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault. Power. Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984 (Vol. 3, pp. 349–364). London: Penguin
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994c). The subject and power. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Michel Foucault. Power. Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984 (Vol. 3, pp. 326–348). London: Penguin
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population. Lectures at the College de France, 1977. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gallent, N., & Bell, A. (2000). Planning exceptions in rural England: Past, present and future. Planning Practice and Research, 15(4), 375–384.
   Google Scholar
• Gallent, N., Hamiduddin, I., Juntti, M., Kidd, S., & Shaw, D. (2015). Introduction to rural planning. Economies, communities and landscapes. London: Routledge. Second edition.
   Google Scholar
• Galli, A., Wiedmann, T., Ercin, E., Knoblauch, D., Ewing, B., & Giljum, S. (2012). Integrating ecological, carbon and water footpring into a ‘footprint family’ of indicators: Definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecological Indicators, 16(1), 100–112.
   Google Scholar
• Gilg, A. W. (1991). Countryside planning policies for the 1990s. Wallingford: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Gilg, A. W., & Kelly, M. (1997). Rural planning in practice: The case of agricultural dwellings. Progress in Planning, 47(2), 75–157.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault (pp. 1–51). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halfacree, K. (2007). Trial by space for a ‘radical rural’: Introducing alternative localities, representations and lives. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 125–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, N. (2011). Discipline, surveillance, control: A Foucaultian perspective on the enforcement of planning regulations. Planning Theory and Practice, 12(1), 57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, I. (1999). Countryside planning: From urban containment to sustainable development. In J. B. Cullingworth (Ed.), British planning.: 50 Years of urban and regional planning (pp. 91–104). London: Athlone.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, M., Li, C., & Molina, A. (2015). The emergence and spread of eco-urban neighbourhoods around the world. Sustainability, 7(9), 11418–11437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M., Petersen, S., Herbstein, T., Roux, S., Nel, D., & Shearing, C. (2015). A conceptual framework to enable the changes required for a one-planet future. Environmental Values, 24(5), 663–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, E. (1898). To-morrow: Peaceful path to real reform. London: Swann Schonenstein.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, P. (2007). Foucault, sexuality, geography. In J. Crampton & S. Elden (Eds.), Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography (pp. 291–315). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2017). Planet plain speaking. In Touchstone 2017. Architecture in Wales, (pp. 29–31). Cardiff: Royal Society of Architects in Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, M. (2002). Governmentality, gender and planning: A Foucauldian perspective. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning Futures: New directions in planning theory (pp. 136–153). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, M. (2006). Spatial rationalities: Order, environment, evolution and government. Social and Cultural Geography, 7(5), 771–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley, M. (2007). Geographies of governmentality. In J. Crampton & S. Elden (Eds.), Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography (pp. 185–204). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, M. (2008). Space and government: Governmentality and geography. Geography Compass, 2(5), 1635–1658.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, M. (2018). Countering ‘the dark side’ of planning. Power, governmentality, counter-conduct. In M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, & V. Watson (Eds.), The routledge handbook of planning theory (pp. 207–220). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Inch, A. (2018). Cultural work’ and the remaking of planning’s ‘apparatus of truth. In M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, & V. Watson (Eds.), The routledge handbook of planning theory (pp. 203–214). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. 2015. Mainstreaming the alternative: The lammas eco-village and the governance of sustainable development in Wales. (Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy). Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University.
   Google Scholar
• Land Use Consultants. (2002). Low impact development – planning policy and practice final report. Cardiff: Welsh Government.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, T., Murdoch, J., Lowe, P., Munton, R., & Flynn, A. (1993). Constructing the countryside. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxey, L. (2009a). Planning and policy for low impact development. In J. Pickerill & L. Maxey (Eds.), Low impact development. The future in our hands (pp. 67–70). Leicester: Department of Geography, University of Leicester
   Google Scholar
• Maxey, L. (2009b). Bringing low impact development into the mainstream. In J. Pickerill & L. Maxey (Eds.), Low impact development. The future in our hands (pp. 20–23). Leicester: Department of Geography, University of Leicester
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). The limits to growth. A report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. London: Earth Island Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J., & Abram, S. (2002). Rationalities of planning: Development versus environment in planning for housing. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S., & Cowell, R. (2011). Land and limits. interpreting sustainability in the planning process (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. RTPI Library Series.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S., Rayner, T., & Bina, O. (2004). New agendas for appraisal: Reflections on theory, practice and research. Environment and Planning A, 36, 1943–1959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickerill, J. (2016). Eco-homes. People, place and politics. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pickerill, J., & Maxey, L. (2009a). Low impact development: The future in our hands. Leicester: Department of Geography, University of Leicester
   Google Scholar
• Pickerill, J., & Maxey, L. (2009b). Geographies of sustainability: Low impact developments and spaces of radical innovation. Geography Compass, 3(4), 1515–1539.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom. Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. (2001). Contesting sustainable development: Low-impact development in Pembrokeshire Coast National Park. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 3, 273–287.
   Google Scholar
• Stockholm Environment Institute and GHD. (2015). Ecological and carbon footprints of Wales. Update to 2011. Stockholm: SEI.
   Google Scholar
• Talbott, J. (1996). The Findhorn community. In J. Conrad (Ed.), Eco-villages and sustainable communities. Models for 21st century living, (pp. 16–18). Findhorn: Findhorn Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, D. (2015). The ‘one planet’ life: A blueprint for low impact development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vale, B., & Vale, R. (2013). The Hockerton housing project, England. In R. Vale & B. Vale (Eds.), Living within a fair share ecological footprint (pp. 262–274). New York: Routledge Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint. Reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S. V. (2004). Planning and urban change. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Assembly Government. (2004). What kind of countryside do we want? Wales Planning Research Programme. Final report by University of Wales, Aberystwyth, and Land Use Consultants. Cardiff: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Assembly Government. (2009). One Wales, one planet. The sustainable development scheme of the welsh assembly government. Cardiff: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Government. (2010a). Planning policy Wales (3 ed.). Cardiff: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Government. (2010b). Technical advice note 6: Planning for sustainable rural communities. Cardiff: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh Government. (2012). Practice guidance. One planet development. Technical advice note 6. Planning for sustainable rural communities. Cardiff: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wimbush, P. (2012). The birth of an eco-village. Adventures in an alternative world. Illford: FeedaRead.com
   Google Scholar
• Wimbush, P. (2014). Sustainable land management consultation – response. Retrieved June 16, 2017, from www.oneplanetcouncil.org
   Google Scholar
• Wrench, T. (2001). Building a low impact roundhouse (2nd ed.). East Meon: Permanent Publications.
   Google Scholar
• WWF. (2016). Living planet report 2016. Risk and resilience in a new era. Gland, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O. (1998). Planning and social control: Exploring the dark side. Journal of Planning Literature, 12(4), 395–406.
   Google Scholar