Late Modernity to Postmodern? The Rise of Global Resilience and its Progressive Potentials for Local Disaster Planning (Seattle and Paris)

References

• Adger, W. N., & Brown, K. (2009). Adaptation, vulnerability and resilience: Ecological and social perspectives. In N. Castree, D. Demeritt, D. Liverman, & B. Rhoads (Eds.), Companion to environmental geography (pp. 109–122). Blackwell: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. (2001). Planning in postmodern times. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, C., & Van Munster, R. (2007). Governing terrorism through risk: Taking precautions,(un) knowing the future. European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 89–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aradau, C., & Van Munster, R. (2012). The securitization of catastrophic events: Trauma, enactment, and preparedness exercises. Alternatives, 37(3), 227–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschan-Leygonie, C. (2000). Vers une analyse de la résilience des systèmes spatiaux. L’espace Géographique, 29(1), 64–77.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1995). Ecological enlightenment: Essays on the politics of the risk society. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2015). Emancipatory catastrophism: What does it mean to climate change and risk society? Current Sociology, 63(1), 75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (2001). Neoliberal newspeak: Notes on the new planetary vulgate. Radical Philosophy, 105(Jan), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bourg, D., & Whiteside, K. (2010). Vers une démocratie écologique: Le citoyen, le savant et le politique. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O’Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., … von Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 19(4), 733–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2012). Planning to change the world: Between knowledge and action lies synthesis. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), 135–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2013). Resilience and the autotelic subject: Toward a critique of the societalization of security. International Political Sociology, 7(2), 210–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2014a). Beyond neoliberalism: Resilience, the new art of governing complexity. Resilience, 2(1), 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2014b). Resilience: The governance of complexity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., & Coaffee, J. (2017). Introduction: Contested paradigms of international resilience. In Chandler, D. & Coaffee, J. (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of international resilience (pp. 3–9). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• City of Seattle. (2016). Community emergency hubs. Retrieved from http://www.seattle.gov/emergency-management/working-together/community-emergency-hubs
   Google Scholar
• Coaffee, J., Wood, D. M., & Rogers, P. (2008). The everyday resilience of the city. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. K. (1999). Shared risk: Complex systems in seismic response. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Corburn, J. (2003). Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making improving urban planning for communities at risk. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(4), 420–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cretney, R., & Bond, S. (2014). ‘Bouncing back’to capitalism? Grass-roots autonomous activism in shaping discourses of resilience and transformation following disaster. Resilience, 2(1), 18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalby, S. (2013). Biopolitics and climate security in the Anthropocene. Geoforum, 49, 184–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2014). Climate change, securitisation of nature, and resilient urbanism. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(2), 360–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVerteuil, G., & Golubchikov, O. (2016). Can resilience be redeemed? Resilience as a metaphor for change, not against change. City, 20(1), 143–151.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, M., & Reid, J. (2009). The liberal way of war: Killing to make life live. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (2018). Resilience and justice: Planning for New York City. Urban Geography, 39(8), 1268–1275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078
   Google Scholar
• Felli, R. (2014). Adaptation et résilience: critique de la nouvelle éthique de la politique environnementale internationale. Éthique Publique. Revue Internationale d’éthique Sociétale et Gouvernementale, 16(1).
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York, NY: Pantheon Books, Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). Birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the collège de France, 1978–1979. New York, NY: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Freitag, R. C., Abranson, D. B., Chalana, M., & Dixon, M. (2014). Whole community resilience: An asset-based approach to enhancing adaptive capacity before a disruption. Journal of the American Planning Association, 80(4), 324–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, K. (2013). Hidden transcripts of resilience: Power and politics in Jamaican disaster management. Resilience, 1(3), 193–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.825463
   Google Scholar
• Grove, K. (2014). Agency, affect, and the immunological politics of disaster resilience. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(2), 240–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L. M., Chu, E. K., & Ziervogel, G. (2018). Negotiated resilience. Resilience, 6(3), 196–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., Martello, M. L., & Haas, P. M. (Eds.). (2004). Earthly politics: Local and global in environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Jon, I. (2018). Resilience and ‘technicity’: Challenges and opportunities for new knowledge practices in disaster planning. Resilience, 7, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Jon, I. (2019). Reframing postmodern planning with feminist social theory: Toward “anti-essentialist norms”. Planning Theory, 147309521985121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219851214
   Google Scholar
• Jon, I., & Purcell, M. (2018). Radical resilience: Autonomous self-management in post-disaster recovery planning and practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(2), 235–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, J. (2013). Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: A governmentality approach. Resilience, 1(1), 38–52.
   Google Scholar
• Kütting, G., & Lipschutz, R. (Eds.). (2012). Environmental governance: Power and knowledge in a local-global world. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Sensemaking: Qualitative data analysis and interpretation. Qualitative Communication Research Methods, 3, 241–281.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. F. (1979). La Condition postmoderne: Rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Mavelli, L. (2017). Governing the resilience of neoliberalism through biopolitics. European Journal of International Relations, 23(3), 489–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meerow, S., & Newell, J. P. (2016). Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why? Urban Geography, 40, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Mythen, G. (2005). Employment, individualization and insecurity: Rethinking the risk society perspective. The Sociological Review, 53(1), 129–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PGRI. (2015). Le plan de gestion des risques d’inondation. Direction Régionale et Interdépartementale de l’Environnement et de l’Énergie d’Île-de-France. Retrieved from: http://www.driee.ile-de-france.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/PGRI_2015_WEB_240416.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reghezza, M. (2015). De l’avènement du Monde à celui de la planète: Le basculement de la société du risque à la société de l’incertitude Mémoire d’habilitation à diriger les recherches, volume inédit (Doctoral dissertation). Université Paris 1-Panthéon Sorbonne.
   Google Scholar
• Reghezza-Zitt, M., & Jon, I. (2019). Gestion des risques et des crises, entre gouvernance de la sécurité et gouvernance territoriale. Ce que la résilience change (ou pas) en Île-de-France. L’Espace Politique, 36. doi:https://doi.org/10.4000/espacepolitique.5463
   Google Scholar
• Reghezza-Zitt, M., & Rufat, S. (2015). Résiliences: Sociétés et territoires face à l’incertitude, aux risques et aux catastrophes. Paris, France: ISTE Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Revet, S. (2009). Vivre dans un monde plus sûr. Catastrophes “naturelles” et sécurité “globale”. Culture et Conflits, 75(3), 33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2001). A “public” muse: On planning convictions and feminist contentions. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(2), 109–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (1998). The death of modernist planning: Radical praxis for a postmodern age. In M. Douglass & J. Friedmann (Eds.), Cities for citizens: Planning and the rise of civil society in a global age (pp. 163–184). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. (2015). Intuitively neoliberal? Towards a critical understanding of resilience governance. European Journal of International Relations, 21(2), 402–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seattle Disaster Recovery Framework. (2015). City of Seattle Disaster Recovery Framework. Seattle, WA. Retrieved from: https://www.seattle.gov/Documents/Departments/Emergency/PlansOEM/Seattle%20Disaster%20Recovery%20Framework%207-7-15v4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Seawright, J, & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SLGRI. (2016). La stratégie de gestion du risque inondation de la Métropole francilienne. Direction régionale et interdépartementale de l’environnement et de l’énergie d’Île-de-France, et Secrétariat général de la zone de défense et de sécurité de Paris. Accessed online at: http://www.driee.ile-de-france.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/projet_slgri_vf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E. (1997). Planning in/for postmodernity. In G. Benko & U. Strohmayer (Eds.), Space and social theory: Interpreting modernity and postmodernity (pp. 236–249). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, K. (2014). The social roots of risk: Producing disasters, promoting resilience. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, K., & Bruneau, M. (2007). Conceptualizing and measuring resilience: A key to disaster loss reduction. TR news, (pp. 250).
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9, 55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weichselgartner, J., & Kelman, I. (2014). Challenges and opportunities for building urban resilience. A/Z ITU Journal of the faculty of Architecture, 11(1), 20–35.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, M. (2014). Resilience and responsibility: Governing uncertainty in a complex world. The Geographical Journal, 180(1), 15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, I. (2013). Water and the city: Risk, resilience, and planning for a sustainable future. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woodruff, S. C., Meerow, S., Stults, M., & Wilkins, C. (2018). Adaptation to resilience planning: Alternative pathways to prepare for climate change. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 0739456X18801057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (2003). Interpretive empirical political science: What makes this not a subfield of qualitative methods. Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 9–13.
   Google Scholar