Limitations of Technical Approaches to Transport Planning Practice in Two Cases: Social Issues as a Critical Component of Urban Projects

References

• Anand, N., Gupta, A., & Appel, H. (Eds.). (2018). The promise of infrastructure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Annema, J. A. (2013). Transport policy. In B. Van Wee, J. A. Annema, & D. Banister (Eds.), The transport system and transport policy: An introduction (pp. 283–304). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Arce-Gomez, A., Donovan, J. D., & Bedggood, R. E. (2015). Social impact assessments: Developing a consolidated conceptual framework. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50, 85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, J., & Faith-Ell, C. (2012). New governance approaches for sustainable project delivery. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 48 (SupplementC), 3239–3250.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (1994). Transport planning: In the UK, USA and Europe. New York, NY: Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, D. R., Harris, C. C., Nielsen, E. A., & McLaughlin, W. J. (2004). A comparison of a technical and a participatory application of social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 22(3), 177–189.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. (2012). Integrating mobility and urban development agendas: A manifesto. disP – The Planning Review, 48(1), 16–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., Le Clercq, F., & Kapoen, L. (2005). Sustainable accessibility: A conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward. Transport Policy, 12(3), 207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., Le Clercq, F., & Straatemeier, T. (2008). Urban transportation planning in transition. Transport Policy, 15(2), 69–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., & Spit, T. (1998). Cities on rails: The redevelopment of railway station areas. New York, NY: Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Beukers, E., Bertolini, L., & Te Brömmelstroet, M. (2012). Why cost benefit analysis is perceived as a problematic tool for assessment of transport plans: A process perspective. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(1), 68–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutilier, R. G. (2014). Frequently asked questions about the social licence to operate. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(4), 263–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantarelli, C. C., & Flyvbjerg, B. (2013). Mega-projects’ cost performance and lock-in: Problems and solutions. In H. Priemus & B. Van Wee (Eds.), International handbook on mega-projects (pp. 333–355). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, G., & Vanclay, F. (2007). Enhancing the social content of environmental management systems in Australian agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 6(3), 326–340.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C. (1958). Transport-maker and breaker of cities. Town Planning Review, 28(4), 237–250.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, R. 2011. The impact of discontinuity in governance: How transport planning went off the rails in Sydney. Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies Working Papers. Sydney, Australian Key Centre in Transport and Logistics Management, University of Sydney. Retrieved from https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/2123/19314/1/ITLS-WP-11-24.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dare, M., Schirmer, J., & Vanclay, F. (2014). Community engagement and social licence to operate. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(3), 188–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ERMK (ERM Mitchell McCotter Pty. Ltd, Kinhill Pty. Ltd, & Rail Access Corporation). (1999). Parramatta rail link: environmental impact statement. Sydney: NSW Department of Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves, A. M., Factor, G., Vanclay, F., Götzmann, N., & Moreiro, S. (2017). Adapting social impact assessment to address a project’s human rights impacts and risks. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 67, 73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves, A. M., Franks, D., & Vanclay, F. (2012). Social impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves, A.M., & Vanclay, F. (2009). Social development needs analysis as a tool for SIA to guide corporate-community investment: Applications in the minerals industry. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(2), 137–145. doi: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019). Urban mobility package. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/urban/urban_mobility/ump_en
   Google Scholar
• Ferrary, C., & Banerjee, P. (2017). Transport. In R. Therivel & G. Wood (Eds.), Methods of environmental and social impact assessment (4th ed., pp. 365–398). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, D., & Vanclay, F. (2013). Social impact management plans: Innovation in corporate and public policy. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 43, 40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, C., Hirsch, P., & Howitt, R. (1993). Can SIA empower communities? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 13, 229–253.
   Google Scholar
• Geurs, K. T., Boon, W., & Van Wee, B. (2009). Social impacts of transport: Literature review and the state of the practice of transport appraisal in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Transport Reviews, 29(1), 69–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurs, K. T., & Van Wee, B. (2004). Landuse/transport interaction models as tools for sustainability impact assessment of transport investments: Review and research perspectives. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 4(3), 333–355.
   Google Scholar
• Grieco, M., & Urry, J. (2016). Introduction. In M. Grieco & J. Urry (Eds.), Mobilities: New perspectives on transport and society (pp. 1–2). Taylor Francis version. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315595733
   Google Scholar
• Hamersma, M., Heinen, E., Tillema, T., & Arts, J. (2018). Understanding resident satisfaction with involvement in highway planning: In-depth interviews during a highway planning process in the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(7), 1224–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, P., Vanclay, F., Langdon, E. J., & Arts, J. (2016). Conceptualizing social protest and the significance of protest actions to large projects. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(1), 217–239.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, N., & Wood, C. (2005). Public participation in environmental impact assessment – Implementing the aarhus convention. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(4), 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., & McManus, P. (2019). Participation in postpolitical times: Protesting westconnex in Sydney, Australia. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(3), 321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeres, N., Tillema, T., & Arts, J. (2012). Integration in Dutch planning of motorways: From ‘line’ towards “area-oriented” approaches. Transport Policy, 24, 148–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howitt, R. (1993). Social impact assessment as “applied peoples’ geography”. Australian Geographical Studies, 31(2), 127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Howitt, R., & Jackson, S. (2000). Social impact assessment and linear projects. In L. R. Goldman (Ed.), Social impact analysis: An applied anthropology manual (pp. 257–294). Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Howitt, R. (2011). Theoretical foundations. In F. Vanclay & A. M. Esteves (Eds.), New directions in social impact assessment: Conceptual and methodological advances (pp. 78–95). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Jijelava, D., & Vanclay, F. (2018). How a large project was halted by the lack of a social licence to operate: Testing the applicability of the Thomson and Boutilier model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 73, 31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., Gregory, D., Pratt, G., & Watts, M. (Eds.). (2000). The dictionary of human geography (4th ed.). Padstow: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, H., Moura, F., & Domingos, T. (2014). Transport infrastructure project evaluation using cost-benefit analysis. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 111, 400–409.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P., & Lucas, K. (2012). The social consequences of transport decision-making: Clarifying concepts, synthesising knowledge and assessing implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 4–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellett, J. R. (1963). The impact of railways on victorian cities. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kwam, R. (2018). Social impact assessment: Integrating social issues in development projects. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank. Retrieved from https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Social_Impact_Assessment_Integrating_Social_Issues_in_Development_Projects.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Legacy, C. (2012). Achieving legitimacy through deliberative plan-making processes: Lessons for metropolitan strategic planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(1), 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Legacy, C. (2017). Transport planning in the urban age. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(2), 177–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legacy, C., Curtis, C., & Scheurer, J. (2017). Planning transport infrastructure: Examining the politics of transport planning in Melbourne, Sydney and Perth. Urban Policy and Research, 35(1), 44–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessard, D. R., & Miller, R. (2013). The shaping of large engineering projects. In H. Priemus & B. Van Wee (Eds.), International handbook on mega-projects (pp. 34–56). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, K., & Markovich, J. (2011). International perspectives on social exclusion research in transport. In G. Currie (Ed.), New perspectives and methods in transport and social exclusion research (pp. 223–240). Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K. (2017). Transport justice: Designing fair transportation systems. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E., & Buys, L. (2012). Making a case for social impact assessment in urban development: Social impacts and legal disputes in Queensland, Australia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 285–292.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders, A., & Arts, J. (2004). Assessing impact: Handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders, A., Baker, J., & Arts, J. (2003). Lessons from practice: Towards successful follow-up. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(1), 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Mottee, L. K., & Howitt, R. (2018). Follow-up and social impact assessment (SIA) in urban transport-infrastructure projects: Insights from the Parramatta rail link. Australian Planner, 55(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh, C. (1999). Making social impact assessment count: A negotiation-based approach for Indigenous peoples. Society & Natural Resources, 12, 63–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh, C. (2010). Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(1), 19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. National place-based policies in the Netherlands. Paris: Author. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/45901622.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S. (1995). From ‘predict and provide’ to ‘predict and prevent’?: Pricing and planning in transport policy. Transport Policy, 2(1), 43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Parraepping. (2018). Build the Parramatta to Epping Rail Link. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/pg/parraepping/about/ https://www.facebook.com/pg/parraepping/about/?ref=page_internal
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, R., Everingham, J.-A., & Kemp, D. (2019). Developing social impact assessment guidelines in a pre-existing policy context. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 37(2), 114–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, R., & Moffat, K. (2014). Integrating impact and relational dimensions of social licence and social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(4), 273–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priemus, H., Bosch-Redveldt, M., & Giezen, M. (2013). Dealing with complexity, uncertainties and risk of megaprojects: Redundancy, resilience and adaptivity. In H. Priemus & B. Van Wee (Eds.), International handbook on mega-projects (pp. 83–110). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Priemus, H., & Van Wee, B. (2013). Mega-projects: High ambitions, complex decision-making, different actors, multiple impacts. In H. Priemus & B. Van Wee (Eds.), International handbook on mega-projects (pp. 1–10). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pulido, D., Darido, G., Munoz-Raskin, R., & Moody, J. (2018). The urban rail development handbook. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/30392/9781464812729.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ross, W. (2000). Mobility and accessibility: The yin and yang of planning. World Transport Policy & Practice, 6(2), 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ruming, K. (2019). Public perceptions of stakeholder influence on Australian metropolitan and local plans. International Planning Studies, 24(2), 110–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurman, F. E., & Sheerazi, A. (2013). Vision document about the web strategy Noord/Zuidlijn between 2010–2013. Retrieved from https://www.noordzuidlijnkennis.net/bibliotheek/vision-document-web-strategy-noordzuidlijn/
   Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T., Lucas, K., Akyelken, N., Solsona, D. C., Carrasco, J.-A., & Neutens, T. (2015). Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74, 123–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. (2018). Mobility justice: The politics of movement in an age of extremes. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, J., & Vella-Brodrick, D. (2009). The usefulness of social exclusion to inform social policy in transport. Transport Policy, 16(3), 90–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, W., & Legacy, C. (2017). Critical urban infrastructure. Urban Policy and Research, 35(1), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolp, A., Groen, W., van Vliet, J., & Vanclay, F. (2002). Citizen values assessment: Incorporating citizens’ value judgements in environmental impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 20(1), 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, K., & Noble, B. (2005). Socio-economic effects monitoring: Toward improvements informed by bio-physical effects monitoring. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23(3), 210–214.
   Google Scholar
• Tricker, R. C. (2007). Assessing cumulative environmental effects from major public transport projects. Transport Policy, 14(4), 293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2002). Conceptualising social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(3), 183–211.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2003). International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(1), 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2004). The triple bottom line and impact assessment: How do TBL, EIA, SIA, SEA and EMS relate to each other? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management, 6(3), 265–288.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F., & Esteves, A. M. (2015). Current trends in social impact assessment: Implications for infrastructure developments. In J. Woltjer, E. Alexander, A. Hull, & M. Ruth (Eds.), Place-based evaluation for integrated landuse management (pp. pp.99–109). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2015). The potential application of qualitative evaluation methods in European regional development: Reflections on the use of performance story reporting in Australian natural resource management. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1326–1339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2017a). Project-induced displacement and resettlement: From impoverishment risks to an opportunity for development? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35(1), 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2017b). The potential contribution of social impact assessment to megaproject developments. In M. Lehtonen, P.-B. Joly, & L. Aparicio (Eds.), Socioeconomic evaluation of megaprojects: Dealing with uncertainties (pp. 181–198). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F., Baines, J., & Taylor, C. N. (2013). Principles for ethical research involving humans: Ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part I. Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal, 31(4), 243–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F., & Esteves, A. M. (Eds.). (2011). New directions in social impact assessment: Conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F., Esteves, A. M., Aucamp, I., & Franks, D. M. (2015). Social impact assessment: Guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. Fargo: International Association for Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/SIA_Guidance_Document_IAIA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F., & Hanna, P. (2019). Conceptualising company response to community protest: Principles to achieve a social licence to operate. Land, 8(6), 101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vervoerregio Amsterdam (2019). Impactstudie Noord/Zuidlijn [North-South Line Impact Study]. Retrieved from https://vervoerregio.nl/pagina/20190815-impactstudie-noordzuidlijn
   Google Scholar
• Woltjer, J. (2002). The ‘public support machine’: Notions of the function of participatory planning by Dutch infrastructure planners. Planning Practice and Research, 17(4), 437–453.
   Google Scholar
• Woltjer, J., Alexander, E., Hull, A., & Ruth, M. (eds). (2015). Place-based evaluation for integrated landuse management. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar