Transcending Dilemmas in Urban Policy-Making: Envisioning versus Adapting, Growing versus Stabilizing

References

• Aalbers, M., & Bernt, M. (2018). The political economy of managing decline and rightsizing. Urban Geography, 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2018.1524654
   Google Scholar
• Abreu, A., Mendes, H., Rodrigues, J., Gusmão, J., Serra, N., Teles, N., … Mamede, R. (2013). A crise, a Troika e as alternativas urgentes. Lisboa: Tinta da China.
   Google Scholar
• Alcott, B. (2005). Jevons´ paradox. Ecological Economics, 54(1), 9–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alden, J., & Rosa Pires, A. (1996). Lisbon. Strategic planning for a capital city. Cities, 13(1), 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, S. (2012). Planned economic contraction: The emerging case for degrowth. Environmental Politics, 21(3), 349–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsas, C. (2004). City centre regeneration in the context of the 2001 European capital of culture in Porto, Portugal. Local Economy, 19(4), 396–410.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. (1998). The consumer society. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. (2007). Evolutionary urban transportation planning: An exploration. Environment and Planning A, 39, 1998–2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. (2010). Coping with irreducible uncertainties of planning: An evolutionary approach. In P. Healey & J. Hillier (Eds.), Ashgate research companion to planning theory: Theoretical challenges for spatial planning (pp. 413–424). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Beukers, E., Bertolini, L., & Te Brömmelstroet, M. (2012). Why cost benefit analysis is perceived as a problematic tool for assessment of transport plans: A process perspective. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46, 68–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontje, M., Musterd, S., & Pelzer, P. (2011). Inventive city-regions: Path dependence and creative knowledge strategies. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• BoP. (2018). Relatório de Estabilidade Financeira. Lisbon: Banco de Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19(2–3), 151–182.
   Google Scholar
• Campos, V., & Ferrão, J. (2015). O ordenamento do território em Portugal: Uma perspetiva genealógica. Lisbon: Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, R., & Meijers, E. (2016). Contrasts between first-tier and second-tier cities in Europe: A functional perspective. European Planning Studies, 24(5), 996–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., Chamusca, P., Fernandes, J., & Pinto, J. (2019). Gentrification in Porto: Floating city users and internationally-driven urban change. Urban Geography, 40, 565–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane, A. (2007). Understanding urban policy: A critical approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, H. (2005). Economics in a full world. Scientific American, 293(3), 100–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davy, B. (2014). Polyrational property rules for the many uses of the land. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 472–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drews, S., & Antal, M. (2016). Degrowth: A “missile word” that backfires? Ecological Economics, 126, 182–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2000). The performance of spatial planning. Planning Practice & Research, 15(4), 299–318.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A. (2018). Towards an integrative perspective: Bringing Ken Wilber’s philosophy to planning theory and practice. Planning Theory and Practice, 19(4), 558–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., Sykes, O., & Batey, P. (2009). Planning theory or planning theories? The hydra model and its implications for planning education. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 4(2), 29–54.
   Google Scholar
• Figge, F., Young, W., & Barkmeyer, R. (2014). Sufficiency or efficiency to achieve lower resource consumption and emissions? The role of the rebound effect. Journal of Cleaner Production, 69, 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1984). Bounded rationality and the politics of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 44(1), 23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortier, I. (2018). The public sector challenged by acceleration: New frontiers. Canadian Public Administration, 61(3), 462–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friend, J., & Hickling, A. (2005). Planning under pressure – The strategic choice approach (3rd ed.). New York, USA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974/1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gualini, E., & Majoor, S. (2007). Innovative practices in large urban development projects: Conflicting frames in the quest for “new urbanity”. Planning Theory and Practice, 8(3), 297–318.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. (2004). Growth fetish. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F. (1999). The post-industrialising city: Political perspectives and culturas biases. GeoJournal, 47(3), 425–432.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. (2017). Prosperity without growth: Foundations for the economy of tomorrow (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, G. (2011). In defence of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 70(5), 873–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallis, G. (2018). Degrowth. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N. (2007). The Shock doctrine. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Korthals Altes, W. (1992). How do planning doctrines function in a changing environment. Planning Theory, 7(8), 110–115.
   Google Scholar
• Latouche, S. (2009). Farewell to growth. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39(6), 517–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManners, P. (2016). Developing policy integrating sustainability: A case study into aviation. Environmental Science & Policy, 57, 86–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D., & Meadows, D. (1972). The limits to growth. New York, NY: New American Library.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Musterd, S., & Ostendorf, W. (2004). Creative cultural knowledge cities: Perspectives and planning strategies. Built Environment, 30(3), 189–193.
   Google Scholar
• Naess, P. (2006). Cost-benefit analyses of transportation investments: Neither critical nor realistic. Journal of Critical Realism, 5(1), 32–60.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, C., & Breda–Vázquez, I. (2011). Territorial governance in Portugal: Institutional change or institutional resilience? disP – the Planning Review, 47(186), 64–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House Business Books.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, J. (2018). A Economia Portuguesa: Formas de economia política numa periferia persistente (1960–2017). Coimbra: Almedina.
   Google Scholar
• Rio Fernandes, J., Carcalho, L., Chamusca, P., & Mendes, T. (2018). O Porto e a AIRBNB. Porto: Book Cover Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., III, Lambin, E., … Foley, J. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodbol-Mekkes, P., van der Valk, A., & Korthals Altes, W. (2012). The Netherlands spatial planning doctrine in disarray in the 21st century. Environment and Planning A, 44, 377–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. (2003). Social acceleration: Ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high-speed society. Constellations, 10(1), 3–33.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. (2015). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving and creativity. Norwood: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Savini, F., & Bertolini, L. (2019). Urban experimentation as a politics of niches. Environment and Planning A, 51(4), 831–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini, F., Salet, W., & Majoor, S. (2014). Dilemmas of planning: Intervention, regulation, and investment. Planning Theory, 14(3), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, S.-M., & Hartmann, T. (2016). Clumsy city by design - A theory for Jabe Jacobs´ imperfect cities? Urban Planning, 1(4), 42–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrell, S. (2009). Jevons´paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 37(4), 1456–1469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, S., & Pinho, P. (2015). Planning for shrinkage: Paradox or paradigm. European Planning Studies, 3(1), 12–32.
   Google Scholar
• Tainter, J. (1988). The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J., & Nicholls, W. (2017). Planning for social justice: Strategies, dilemmas, tradeoffs. Planning Theory, 16(1), 32–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Valk, A., & Faludi, A. (1997). The green heart and the dynamics of doctrine. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 12(1), 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• van Hulst, M., & Yanow, D. (2016). From policy “frames” to “framing”: Theorizing a more dynamic, political approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(1), 92–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, N. (1998). Similarities, connections and systems: The search for a new rationality for planning and management. Boston, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Verweij, M., Douglas, M., Ellis, R., Engel, C., Hendriks, F., Lohmann, S., … Thompson, M. (2006). Clumsy solutions for a complex world: The case of climate change. Public Administration, 84(4), 817–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, A., & Woodhouse, E. (1992). Reframing incrementalism: A constructive response to the critics. Policy Sciences, 25(3), 255–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiechmann, T., & Pallagst, K. (2012). Urban shrinkage in Germany and the USA: A comparison of transformation patterns and local strategies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(2), 261–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahirovich-Herbert, V., & Gibler, K. (2014). The effect of new residential construction on housing prices. Journal of Housing Economics, 26, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar