References
- Ahearn, E. J. (2010). Urban Confrontations in Literature and Social Science, 1848–2001. Routledge.
- Artyushina, A. (2020). Is civic data governance the key to democratic smart cities? The role of the urban data trust in Sidewalk Toronto. Telematics and Informatics, 55, 101456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101456.
- Barnes, S. (2020). Platform urbanism. Negotiating platform ecosystems in connected cities. Springer.
- Betsky, A. (2020). Google’s urban ambitions. Architect Magazine. https://www.architectmagazine.com/design/googles-urban-ambitions_o
- Braumann, A. (2020). Amazon’s HQ2 site selection criteria: The new ‘gold standard’ in FDI decision-making. Urban Planning, 5(3), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i3.3207.
- Campbell, H. (2010). The idea of planning: Alive or dead – Who cares? Planning Theory & Practice, 11(4), 471–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2010.536716.
- Caro, R. (1975). The power broker. Robert moses and the fall of New York. Vintage.
- Carr, C. (2018). Wagering the waterfront? Angling the abc & xyz of Quayside Toronto. Urbanization Unbound, http://urbanunbound.blogspot.com/2018/08/wagering-waterfront-abc-xyz-of-quayside.html
- Carr, C., & Hesse, M. (2020a). When Alphabet Inc. plans Toronto’s waterfront: New post-political modes of urban governance. Urban Planning, 5(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2519.
- Carr, C., & Hesse, M. (2020b). Sidewalk Labs closed down – Whither Google’s smart city? Regions, https://regions.regionalstudies.org/ezine/article/sidewalk-labs-closed-down-whither-googles-smart-city/?doi=10.1080/13673882.2020.00001070. https://doi.org/10.1080/13673882.2020.00001070
- Darrow, S. (2019). The people’s side of the road: Movement against destruction and organizing across lines of race, class, and neighborhood. In P. N. King, K. Drabinski, & J. C. Davis (Eds.), Baltimore revisited (pp. 103–117). Rutgers University Press.
- Daub, A. (2020). What tech calls thinking – An inquiry into the intellectual bedrock of Silicon Valley. Macmillan.
- Galloway, S. (2018). Amazon HQ2: The winner is… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3baKe4B3eyI
- Goodman, E. P., & Powles, J. (2019). Urbanism under Google: Lessons from Sidewalk Toronto. Fordham Law Review, 88(2), 4. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5628&context=flr
- Gupta, P. S. (2019). The fleeting, unhappy affair of Amazon HQ2 and New York City. Transnational Legal Theory, 10(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2019.1609785.
- Gutman, M. (2008). Race, place, and play: Robert moses and the WPA swimming pools in New York City. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 67(4), 532–561. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2008.67.4.532.
- Fernandez, R., Adriaans, I., Klinge, T. J., Hendrikse, R. (2020). Engineering digital monopolies – The financialization of Big Tech. Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations. https://www.somo.nl/the-financialisation-of-big-tech/
- Flynn, A., & Valverde, M. (2019). Planning on the waterfront: Setting the agenda for Toronto’s “smart city” Project. Planning Theory & Practice, 20(5), 769–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2019.1676566.
- Flynn, A., & Valverde, M. (2020). Where the sidewalk ends: The governance of waterfront Toronto’s Sidewalk Labs deal. The. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 36(2019), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6425.
- Future Cities Canada. (2020). Lessons learned with Sidewalk Labs. https://portal.futurecitiescanada.ca/resources/lessons-learned-with-sidewalk-labs/
- Joerges, B. (1999). Do politics have artefacts? Social Studies of Science, 29(3), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631299029003004.
- Kaufman, H. (1975). Robert Moses: The charismatic bureaucrat. Political Science Quarterly, 90(3), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/2148299.
- Leszczynski, A. (2020). Glitchy vignettes of platform urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819878721.
- Nager, A. B., Lowe Reed, A. S., & Langford, W. S. (2019). Catching the whale: A comparison of place promotion strategies through the lens of Amazon HQ2. Geography Compass, 13(9), e12462. Article . https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12462.
- New York City (NYC). (2018). Request for information. Project Clancy. New York City. https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/526-ny-amazon-proposal/03a603e8af6bbbc0272e/optimized/full.pdf
- Raco, M., & Savini, F. (2019). Planning and knowledge – How new forms of technology are shaping contemporary cities. Bristol University Press.
- Sidewalk Labs. (2017). A Project Vision. https://storage.googleapis.com/sidewalk-labs-com-assets/Sidewalk_Labs_Vision_Sections_of_RFP_Submission_7ad06759b5/Sidewalk_Labs_Vision_Sections_of_RFP_Submission_7ad06759b5.pdf
- Teaford, J. C. (2008). Caro versus Moses, round two: Robert Caro’s The Power Broker. Technology and Culture, 49(2), 442–448. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40061524
- Temenos, C., & Lauermann, J. (2020). The urban politics of policy failure. Urban Geography, 41(9), 1109–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1827194.
- Toronto Life. (2019). The Sidewalk wars. https://torontolife.com/city/18-big-thinkers-take-a-critical-look-at-the-sidewalk-labs-plan/
- Tyrnauer, M. (Director) (2016). Citizen Jane – The Battle for the City. Altmeier Films.
- Valverde, M. (2018). Mystery on the waterfront: How the “Smart City” allure led a major public agency in Toronto into a reckless deal with big tech. Center for Free Expression. https://cfe.ryerson.ca/blog/2018/12/mystery-waterfront-how-smart-city-allure-led-major-public-agency-toronto-reckless-deal
- Verga, C. (2019). Saving Fire Island from Robert Moses: The fight for a national seashore. The History Press.
- Wainwright, O. (2017). Street fighter: How Jane Jacobs saved New York from Bulldozer Bob. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2017/apr/30/citizen-jane-jacobs-the-woman-who-saved-manhattan-from-the-bulldozer-documentary
- Wallock, L. (1991). The myth of the master builder: Robert Moses, New York, and the dynamics of metropolitan development since World War II. Journal of Urban History, 17(4), 339–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/009614429101700401.
- Waterfront Toronto (WT). (2017). Request for proposals innovation and funding partner for the Quayside development opportunity. Waterfront Toronto. A Project Vision. https://quaysideto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Waterfront-Toronto-Request-for-Proposals-March-17-2017.pdf
- Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652
- Zukin, S. (2020). The innovation complex: Cities, tech, and the new economy. Oxford University Press.
- Zukin, S. (2021). Planetary Wilicon Valley: Deconstructing New York’s innovation complex. Urban Studies, 58(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020951421.