Israeli Real-Estate Buzz – Planning Discourse and Media Coverage

References

• Albrechts, L., & Denayer, W. (2001). Communicative planning, emancipatory politics and postmodernism. In R. Paddison (Ed.), Handbook of urban studies (pp. 369–384). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alfasi, N. (2021). Why public participation isn’t a tool for democratizing planning. A comment. Planning Theory, 20(2), 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095221991487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2012). Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS 37(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00468.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alster, T., & Avni, N. (2021). The divergent logics of urban regeneration in Israel: A neoliberal toolkit and national rationales. Urban Studies, 004209802110360. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211036012
   Google Scholar
• Amble, B. (2010). Morals and politics in the ideology of neo-liberalism. Socio-Economic Review, 3(30), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwq015
   Google Scholar
• Bond, S. (2011). Negotiating a democratic ethos: Moving beyond the agonistic-communicative divide. Planning Theory, 10(2), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210383081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botbol, T., Fenster, T., & Kulka, T. (2015). Academy–community partnerships: Challenges and changes in Israeli urban regeneration projects. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 19(3), 63–87. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/1218/1216
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode, 34 (3), 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., Tait, M., & Watkins, C. (2014). Is there space for better planning in a neoliberal world? Implications for planning practice and theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X13514614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, J. (2010). Communicative capitalism: Circulation and the foreclosure of politics. In M. Boler (Ed.), Digital media and democracy: Tactics in hard times. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duque Franco, I., & Ortiz, C. (2020). Medellín in the headlines: The role of the media in the dissemination of urban models. Cities, 96, 102431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elden, S., & Crampton, J. (2007). Introduction. In J. Crampton & S. Elden (Eds.), Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography (pp. 1–16). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse, textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feitelson, E. (2018). Shifting sands of planning in Israel. Land Use Policy, 79, 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., & Richardson, T. (2002). Planning and Foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning futures: New directions for planning theory (pp. 44–62). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2012). Why mass media matter to planning research: The case of mega projects. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X12441950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1980). Critical theory and planning practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 46(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368008977043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2012). Learning to improve practice: Lessons from practice stories and practitioners’ own discourse analyses (or why only the loons show up). Planning Theory & Practice, 13(1), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.649905
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1969). The archaeology of knowledge. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). “Two lectures” and “truth and power”. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2001). The subject and power. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984. The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, R., & Rosen, G. (2020). The face of affordable housing in a neoliberal paradigm. Urban Studies, 57(5), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018818967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2010). Grounding critical communication studies: An enquiry into the communication theory of Karl Marx. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 34(1), 15–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859909338409
   Google Scholar
• Gavin, N. T. (2007). Press and television in British politics: Media, money, and mediated democracy. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Geva, Y., & Rosen, G. (2018). The regeneration deal: Developers, homeowners and new competencies in the development process. Geoforum, 96, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geva, Y., & Rosen, G. (2022). A win-win situation? Urban regeneration and the paradox of homeowner displacement. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211050079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, T. A. (2004). Covering the world-class downtown: Seattle’s local media and the politics of urban development. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 21(4), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/0739318042000245336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halbert, L., & Attuyer, K. (2016). Introduction: The financialisation of urban production: Conditions, mediations and transformations. Urban Studies, 53(7), 1347–1361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016635420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1993). The communicative work of development plans. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henneberry, J., & Parris, S. (2013). The embedded developer: Using project ecologies to analyze local property development networks. Town Planning Review, 84 (2), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2013.13
   Google Scholar
• Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Inch, A. (2015). Ordinary citizens and the political cultures of planning: In search of the subject of a new democratic ethos. Planning Theory, 14(4), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214536172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. (1998). Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369808975956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K. (2006). Discourse analysis and its utility for urban policy research. Urban Policy and Research, 24(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140600590817
   Google Scholar
• Jutel, O. (2011). ‘The way of the world’, neo-liberal discourse, the media and Fisher & Paykel’s offshore relocation. Communication, Politics & Culture, 44(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.127724313398847
   Google Scholar
• Lavee, E., & Cohen, N. (2019). How street-level bureaucrats become policy entrepreneurs: The case of urban renewal. Governance, 32(3), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavy, B., Dascher, E., & Hagelman, R. (2016). Media portrayal of gentrification and redevelopment on Rainey Street in Austin, Texas (USA), 2000–2014. City, Culture and Society, 7(4), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2016.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Legacy, C., Metzger, J., Steele, W., & Gualini, E. (2019). Beyond the post-political: Exploring the relational and situated dynamics of consensus and conflict in planning. Planning Theory, 18(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219845628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch, S., & Palmer, I. (2010). Analyzing texts in context: Current practices and new protocols for critical discourse analysis in organization studies. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1194–1212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00884.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margalit, T., & Mualam, N. (2020). Selective rescaling, inequality and popular growth coalitions: The case of the Israeli national plan for earthquake preparedness. Land Use Policy, 99, 105123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe, C., & Rogers, D. (2019). The politics of value in urban development: Valuing conflict in agonistic pluralism. Planning Theory, 18(3), 300–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219831381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mualam, N. (2018). Playing with supertankers: Centralization in land use planning in Israel- a national experiment underway. Land Use Policy, 75, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, W., & Uitermark, J. (2017). Planning/resistance. Urban Geography, 38(4), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1168570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, T. (2017). The death of expertise: The campaign against established knowledge and why it matters. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, P., & Silke, H. (2011). Market “realities”: De-coding neoliberal ideology and media discourses. Australian Journal of Communication, 38 (3), 47–64. https://informit.org/doi/epdf/10.3316/ielapa.776555951896092
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. (2001). Ten theses on politics. Theory and Event, 5(3), 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. (2006). Hatred of democracy. Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, D. (2014). The Sydney metropolitan strategy as a zoning technology: Analyzing the spatial and temporal dimensions of obsolescence. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(1), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1068/d20912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, D. (2016). Monitory democracy as citizen-driven participatory planning: The urban politics of REDWatch in Sydney. Urban Policy and Research, 34(3), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2015.1077804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, G., & Avni, N. (2019). Negotiating urban redevelopment: Exploring the neighborhood council planning model. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 0739456X1988410–0739456X1988412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X19884100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (1997). Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for multicultural cities. Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schatz, L., & Rogers, D. (2016). Participatory, technocratic and neoliberal planning: An untenable planning governance ménage à trois. Australian Planner, 53(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2015.1135816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, L., & Stephenson, M. (2016). Planning, development, and media: A case study of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X15620280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, E., Negev, M., Feitelson, E., & Zaychik, D. (2017). Devising “policy packages” for seismic retrofitting of residences. Natural Hazards, 89(1), 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2978-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamai, M., & Hananel, R. (2020). One + One + One = a lot: The cumulative effect of Israel’s flagship urban renewal policy on neighborhood diversity. Land Use Policy, 100, 104946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmueli, D., Segal, E., Ben Gal, M., Feitelson, E., & Reichman, E. (2019). Earthquake readiness in volatile regions: The case of Israel. Natural Hazards, 98(2), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03698-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y. (2014). The return of “the people”: Populism and anti-populism in the shadow of the European crisis. Constellations, 21(4), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12127
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Apocalypse forever? Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 213–232. ‏https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409358728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T. (2008). Changing interpretations of “flexibility” in the planning literature: From opportunism to creativity? International Planning Studies, 13(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470802521382
   Google Scholar
• Walker, H. M., Reed, M. G., & Fletcher, A. J. (2020). Wildfire in the news media: An intersectional critical frame analysis. Geoforum, 114, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, J., & Weston, M. (2013). Inclusion and transparency in planning decision-making: Planning officer reports to the planning committee. Planning Practice and Research, 28(2), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.704736
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Comber, R. (2019). Urban planning, public participation and digital technology: App development as a method of generating involvement in local citizen planning processes. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(2), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317712515
   Google Scholar