The Spatial, Material and Temporal Dimensions of Planning Regulations: A Legal Geography Perspective

References

• Abram, S. (2014). The time it takes: Temporalities of planning. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 20, 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartel, R., Graham, N., Jackson, S., Prior, J., Robinson, D., Sherval, M., & Williams, S. (2013). Legal geography: An Australian perspective. Geographical Research, 51(4), 339–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. (2012). Planning with things. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X11435415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. (2015). Planning matter. Acting with things. Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benda-Beckmann, F. v., & Benda-Beckmann, K. v. (2014). Places that come and go. A legal anthropological perspective on the temporalities of space in plural legal orders. In: Braverman, I., Blomley, N., Delaney, D., & Kedar, A. (Eds.), The expanding spaces of law. A timely legal geography (pp. 30–52). Stanford Law Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., & Layard, A. (2015a). Legal geography: Becoming spatial detectives. Geography Compass, 9(7), 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., & Layard, A. (2015b). There are eight million stories in the naked city. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 7(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-10-2014-0030
   Google Scholar
• Benson, M. (2014). Rules of engagement. The spatiality of judicial review. In Braverman, I., Blomley, N., Delaney, D. & Kedar, A. (Eds.), The expanding spaces of law. A timely legal geography (pp. 215–238). Stanford Law Books.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (1994). Law, space and geographies of power. The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (2013). Performing property: Making the world. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 26(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0841820900005944
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (2014). Learning from Larry. Pragmatism and the habits of legal space. In Braverman, I., Blomley, N., Delaney, D., & Kedar, A. (Eds.), The expanding spaces of law. A timely legal geography. (pp. 77–94). Stanford Law Books.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (2016). The boundaries of property: Complexity, relationality, and spatiality. Law & Society Review, 50(1), 224–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (2017). Land use, planning, and the “difficult character of property. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1179336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braverman, I. (2014). Who’s afraid of methodology? Advocating a methodological turn in legal geography. In I. Braverman, N. Blomley, D. Delaney, & A. Kedar (Eds.), The expanding spaces of law. A timely legal geography (pp. 120–141). Stanford Law Books.
   Google Scholar
• Braverman, I., Blomley, N., Delaney, D., & Kedar, A. (2014). Introduction. Expanding the spaces of law. In I. Braverman, N. Blomley, D. Delaney, & A. Kedar (Eds.), The expanding spaces of law. A timely legal geography (pp. 1–29). Stanford Law Books.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. (2001). Foreword. In N. Blomley, D. Delaney, & R. Ford (Eds.), The legal geographies reader (pp. x–xii). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. (2002). Far beyond ‘the early morning crowing of a farmyard cock’: Revisiting the place of nuisance within legal and political discourse. Social & Legal Studies, 11(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663902011001752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, D. (2001). Running with the land: Legal-historical imagination and the spaces of modernity. Journal of Historical Geography, 27(4), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhge.2001.0352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, D. (2010). The spatial, the legal and the pragmatics of world-making: Nomospheric investigations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, D., Ford, T., & Blomley, N. (2001). Preface: Where is law? In N. K. Blomley, D. Delaney, & R. T. Ford, (Eds.), The legal geographies reader: law, power and space (pp. xiii–xxii). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ferm, J., Clifford, B., Canelas, P., & Livingstone, M. (2021). Emerging problematics of deregulating the urban: The case of permitted development in England. Urban Studies, 58(10), 2040–2058. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020936966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodall, M. (2016). A practical guide to permitted changes of use under the General Permitted Development Order, 2nd ed. Bath Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goodall, M. (2017). The essential guide to the use of land and buildings under the Planning Acts including the Use Classes Order. Bath Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grabham, E. (2016). Brewing legal times: Things, form and the enactment of law. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Healey, P. (1999). Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies, 7(5), 623–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319908720542
   Google Scholar
• Grant, M. (1996). Permitted development. 2nd ed. Sweet and Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D., & Vigar, G. (2010). The new spatial planning. Territorial management with soft spaces and fuzzy boundaries. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kedar, A. (2014). Expanding legal geographies. A call for a critical comparative approach. In I. Braverman, N. Blomley, D. Delaney, & A. Kedar (Eds.), The expanding spaces of law. A timely legal geography (pp. 94–119). Stanford Law Books.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, S. (2021). Space and belonging. In M. Valverde, K. Clarke, E. Darian-Smith, & P. Kotiswaran (Eds.), Routledge handbook of law and society (pp. 225–228). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laurian, L., & Inch, A. (2019). On time and planning: Opening futures by cultivating a ‘sense of now. Journal of Planning Literature, 34(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412218817775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layard, A. (2015). Freedom of expression and spatial (imaginations of) justice. In D. Kochenov, G. de Burca, & A. Williams (Eds.), Europe’s justice deficit? (pp. 417–433). Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Layard, A. (2016). Public space: Property, lines, interruptions. Journal of Law, Property and Society, 2(1), 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Layard, A. (2019). Reading law spatially. In N. Creutzfeldt, M. Mason, & K. McConnachie (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of socio-legal theory and methods (pp. 232–243). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M., & Abbot, C. (Eds). (2022). Taking English planning law scholarship seriously. UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieto, L. (2017). How material objects become urban things? City, 21(5), 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1374782
   Google Scholar
• Lieto, L., & Beauregard, R. (2016). Introduction. In L. Lieto, & R. Beauregard (Eds.), Planning for a material world. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, Z. (2008). Spaces of international law. Griffith Law Review, 17(2), 489–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383621.2008.10854621
   Google Scholar
• Perin, C. (1977). Everything in its place. Social order and land use in America. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. (2011). Law’s spatial turn: Geography, justice and a certain fear of space. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 7(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872109355578
   Google Scholar
• Platt, R. (2014). Land use and society: Geography, law and public policy. 3rd ed. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, J., Crofts, P., & Hubbard, P. (2013). Planning, law and sexuality: Hiding immorality in plain view. Geographical Research, 51(4), 353–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2020). Silences, categories and black-boxes: Towards an analytics of the relations of power in planning regulation. Planning Theory, 19(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219870559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sack, R. 1986. Human territoriality: Its theory and history. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, A., Peel, D., Ritchie, H., & Berry, S. (2017). The essential guide to planning law. Decision-making and practice in the UK. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Sousa Santos, B. (1987). Law: A map of misreading. Toward a postmodern conception of law. Journal of Law and Society, 14(3), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1410186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. (2005). Taking land use seriously: Toward an ontology of municipal law. Law, Text, Culture, 34(1), 34–59.
   Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. (2009). Jurisdiction and scale: Legal ‘technicalities’ as resources for theory. Social & Legal Studies, 18(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663909103622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. (2011). Seeing like a city: The dialectic of modern and pre-modern ways of seeing in urban governance. Law & Society Review, 45(2), 277–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00441.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. (2012). Everyday law on the street. City governance in an age of diversity. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. (2014). Time thickens, takes on flesh. Spatiotemporal dynamics in law. In I. Braverman, N. Blomley, D. Delaney, & A. Kedar (Eds.), The expanding spaces of law. A timely legal geography (pp. 53–76). Stanford Law Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wideman, T. J., & Lombardo, N. (2019). Geographies of land use: Planning, property, and law. Geography Compass, 13(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windemer, R. (2019). Considering time in land use planning: An assessment of end-of-life decision making for commercially managed onshore wind schemes. Land Use Policy, 87, 104024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar