Truth, Lies or Allies? The Agency of Estimates

References

• Adolphson, M., & Jonsson, D. (2020). Uncover the theory practice gap in Swedish transport planning: An interdisciplinary approach. European Planning Studies, 11, 28, 2237–2260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1715927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. A. (2015). Planning matter: Acting with things. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. A. (2020). Advanced introduction to planning theory. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, L. (2010). Theorizing practice and practising theory: Outlines for an actor-relational-approach in planning. Planning Theory, 9(1), 28–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209346499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2012). ‘Planning ethics’ and rediscovering the idea of planning. Planning Theory, 11(4), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212442159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2002). Utilitarianism’s bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning. Planning Theory, 1(2), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/147309520200100205
   Google Scholar
• Caro, R. A. (1974). The power broker: Robert Moses and the fall of New York. Alfred A. Knopf Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2006). Evidence-based planning: Rhetoric and reality. disP-The Planning Review, 42(165), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2006.10556951
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriou, H. T., Ward, E. J., & Wright, P. G. (2013). Mega transport projects – Beyond the ‘iron triangle’: Findings from the OMEGA research programme. Progress in Planning, 86, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, J. (2009). The “infrastructure turn” in Australian metropolitan spatial planning. International Planning Studies, 14(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470903021100
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H., Dreyfus, S. E., & Athanasiou, T. (1986). Mind over machine. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A., & Waterhout, B. (2006). Introducing evidence-based planning. disP – The Planning Review, 42(165), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2006.10556950
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again (S. Sampson, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2005). Machiavellian megaprojects. Antipode, 37(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., Ansar, A., Budzier, A., Buhl, S., Cantarelli, C., Garbuio, M., Glenting, C., Holm, M. S., Lovallo, D., Lunn, D., Molin, E., Rønnest, A., Stewart, A., & van Wee, B. (2018). Five things you should know about cost overrun. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 118, 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. S., & Buhl, S. (2002). Underestimating costs in public works projects: Error or lie? Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208976273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2017). On the evolution of a critical pragmatism. In B. Haselsberger (Ed.), Encounters with planning thought (pp. 280–296). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. (1967). The principle of the hiding hand. The Public Interest, 6, 10. https://search.proquest.com/openview/83d08fe33c6a6e7044d5466f348e5837/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1817076
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2018). The Green Book: Central government guidance on appraisal and evaluation. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book-appraisal-and-evaluation-in-central-governent
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1977). Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA047747
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Lovallo, D., & Sibony, O. (2011). Before you make that big decision. Harvard business review, 89(6), 50–60, 137. https://www.academia.edu/download/53660272/Kahnemann-Before_you_make_that_big_decision.pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumholz, N. (1982). A retrospective view of equity planning Cleveland 1969–1979. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368208976535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieto, L. (2017). How material objects become urban things? City, 21(5), 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1374782
   Google Scholar
• Love, P. E., & Ahiaga-Dagbui, D. D. (2018). Debunking fake news in a post-truth era: The plausible untruths of cost underestimation in transport infrastructure projects. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 113, 357–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, P. E., Ika, L. A., & Sing, M. C. (2019). Does the planning fallacy prevail in social infrastructure projects? Empirical evidence and competing explanations. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(6). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2944161
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. C. (2020). The trials & tribulations of Ken Mathers, policy entrepreneur. Australian Journal of Political Science, 55(4), 416–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2020.1804831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nostikasari, D., & Casey, C. (2020). Institutional barriers in the coproduction of knowledge for transportation planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 21(5), 671–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2020.1849777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peattie, L. (2001). Theorizing planning: Some comments on Flyvbjerg’s rationality and power. International Planning Studies, 6(3), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/713672898
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2007). Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory, 6(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207075161
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., & Tate, L. (2016). Actor networks of planning: Exploring the influence of actor network theory. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., Natarajan, L., Lee, M., & Lock, S. (2018). Black-boxing the evidence: Planning regulation and major renewable energy infrastructure projects in England and Wales. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1456080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, G., & Legacy, C. (2019). Australian mega transport business cases: Missing costs and benefits. Urban Policy and Research, 37(4), 458–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2019.1663727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wee, B., & Priemus, H. (2017). Megaproject decision making and management. In B. Flyvbjerg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of megaproject management (pp. 118–136). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wachs, M. (1990). Ethics and advocacy in forecasting for public policy (Papers from the 1990 Conference on Moral Problems in the Professions). Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 9(12), 141. https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej199091/215
   Google Scholar