References

• Baer, L. D. & Ravneberg, B. (2008). The outside and inside in Norwegian and English prisons. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 90, 205–216.10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00287.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosworth, M., Hoyle, C., & Dempsey, M. M. (2011). Researching trafficked women: On institutional resistance and the limits to feminist reflexivity. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 769–779.10.1177/1077800411423192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. (2007). Silenced for their own protection: How the IRB marginalizes those it feigns to protect. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6, 339–349.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing” neoliberalism. Antipode, 34, 349–379.10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr, J., & Reynolds, P. (2010). The wrong paradigm? Social research and the predicates of ethical scrutiny. Research Ethics Review, 6, 128–133.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life. New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cislo, A. M., & Trestman, R. (2013). Challenges and solutions for conducting research in correctional settings: The U.S. experience. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36, 304–310.10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comfort, N. (2009). The prisoner as model organism: Malaria research at Statesville Penitentiary. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 40, 190–203.10.1016/j.shpsc.2009.06.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Committee Appointed by Governer Dwight H. Green of Illinois. (1948). Ethics governing the service of prisoners as subjects in medical experiments. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 136, 457–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crang, M. (2002). Qualitative methods: The new orthodoxy? Progress in Human Geography, 26, 647–655.10.1191/0309132502ph392pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crewe, B. (2014). Not looking hard enough: Masculinity, Emotion, and Prison Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 392–403.10.1177/1077800413515829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crewe, B., Warr, J., Bennett, P., & Smith, A. (2014). The emotional geography of prison life. Theoretical Criminology, 18, 56–74.10.1177/1362480613497778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, D. H., & Harvey, J. (2014). Performing the role of ethnographer: Processing and managing the emotional dimensions of prison research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17, 489–501.10.1080/13645579.2013.769702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. A., & Martin, D. G. (2000). “Placing” interviews: Location and scales of power in qualitative research. Professional Geographer, 52, 649–657.10.1111/0033-0124.00253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Few-Demo, A. L., & Arditti, J. A. (2014). Relational vulnerabilities of incarcerated and reentry mothers: Therapeutic implications. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 1297–1320.10.1177/0306624X13495378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Few, A. L., & Rosen, K. H. (2005). Victims of chronic dating violence: How women’s vulnerabilities link to their decisions to stay. Family Relations, 54, 265–279.10.1111/fare.2005.54.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, R. W. (2007). Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, R. W. (2008). Forgotten places and the seeds of grassroots planning. In C. R. Hale (Ed.), Engaging contradictions: Theory, politics, and methods of activist scholarship (pp. 141–162). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harkness, J. M. (1996). Nuremberg and the issue of wartime experiments on US prisoners. JAMA, 276, 1672–1675.10.1001/jama.1996.03540200058032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, J. (1972, July 26). Syphilis victims in U.S. study went untreated for 40 years. New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, S. (2000). Beneficial and unusual punishment: An argument in support of prisoner participation in clinical trials. Indiana Law Review, 33, 475–515.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hornblum, A. M. (1997). They were cheap and available: Prisoners as research subjects in twentieth century America. BMJ, 315, 1437–1441.10.1136/bmj.315.7120.1437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijsmans, R. (2012). Beyond compartmentalization: A relational approach towards agency and vulnerability of young migrants. In A. Orgocka & C. Clark-Kazak (Eds.), Independent child migration-insights into agency, vulnerability and structure: New directions for child and adolescent development, number 136 (pp. 29–45). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. (2006). Ethical considerations for research involving prisoners. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janesick, V. J. (1999). A journal about journal writing as a qualitative research technique: History, issues, and reflections. Qualitative Inquiry, 5, 505–524.10.1177/107780049900500404
   Google Scholar
• Janesick, V. J. (2000). The choreography of qualitative research design: Minuets, improvisations, and crystallization. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 379–400). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jewkes, Y. (2011). Autoethnography and emotion as intellectual resources: Doing prison research differently. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 63–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewkes, Y. (2014). Special section editorial: An introduction to “doing prison research differently”. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 387–391.10.1177/1077800413515828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K. T., & Popke, E. J. (2010). Re-envisioning the city: Lefebvre, Hope VI, and the neoliberalization of urban space. Urban Geography, 31, 114–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (2014). Violence against women as ‘relational’ vulnerability: Engendering the sustainable human development agenda. New York, NY: UNDP Human Development Report Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N., Khawar, M., & Sayeed, A. (2010). Beyond risk management: Vulnerability, social protection and citizenship in Pakistan. Journal of International Development, 22, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmbach, K. C., & Lyons, P. M. (2003). Ethical and legal standards for research in prisons. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 671–686.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, C. (1994). Playing the field: Questions of fieldwork in geography. Professional Geographer, 46, 67–72.10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00067.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohl, E., & McCutcheon, P. (2014). Kitchen table reflexivity: Negotiating positionality through everyday talk. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 22, 747–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laliberte, N., & Schurr, C. (2015). The stickiness of emotions in the field: Complicating feminist methodologies. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 23, 72–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, B. H. (2007). Subjects or Objects? Prisoners and Human Experimentation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 356, 1806–1807.10.1056/NEJMp068280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, C., Faden, R., Grady, C., Hammerschmidt, D., Eckenwiler, L., & Sugarman, J. (2004). The limitations of “vulnerability” as a protection for human research participants. The American Journal of Bioethics, 4, 44–49.10.1080/15265160490497083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebling, A. (2014). Postscript: Integrity and emotion in prisons research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 481–486.10.1177/1077800413516273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotke, E., & Wagner, P. (2005). Prisoners of the census: Electoral and financial consequences of counting prisoners where they go, not where they come from. Pace Law Review, 24, 587–607.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. G., & Inwood, J. (2012). Subjectivity, power, and the IRB. The Professional Geographer, 64, 7–15.10.1080/00330124.2011.596781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L., & Mitchelson, M. L. (2009). Geographies of detention and imprisonment: Interrogating spatial practices of confinement, discipline, law, and state power. Geography Compass, 3, 459–477.10.1111/geco.2009.3.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, C. (1989). Experimentation on prisoners: The inadequacy of voluntary consent. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 15, 55–80.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, B. E. (2013). Coercion in research: Are prisoners the only vulnerable population? The Journal of American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 41, 8–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKittrick, K. (2012). On plantations, prisons, and a black sense of place. Social & Cultural Geography, 12, 947–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrifield, A. (1993). Place and space: A Lefebvrian reconciliation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 18, 516–531.10.2307/622564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchelson, M. L. (2012). The urban geography of prisons: Mapping the city’s ‘other’ gated community. Urban Geography, 33, 147–157.10.2747/0272-3638.33.1.147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchelson, M. L. (2013). Up the river (from home): Where does the prisoner ‘count’ on census day? In D. Moran, N. Gill, & D. Conlon (Eds.), Carceral spaces (pp. 77–92). Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchelson, M. L. (2014). The production of bedspace: Prison privatization and abstract space. Geographica Helvetica, 69, 325–333.10.5194/gh-69-325-2014
   Google Scholar
• Moran, D. (2013). Leaving behind the ‘total institution’? Teeth, transcarceral spaces and (re)inscription of the formerly incarcerated body. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 21, 35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2001). When prisoners return to the community: Political, economic, and social consequences. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, C., & Earle, R. (2010). Reading Difference Differently? British Journal of Criminology, 50, 360–378.10.1093/bjc/azp081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter, K. (2014). Making windows in walls: Strategies for prison research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 417–428.10.1177/1077800413515831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reverby, S. M. (2013). Examining Tuskegee: The infamous syphilis study and its legacy. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, A. (2014). Situating the self in prison research: Power, identity, and epistemology. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 404–416.10.1177/1077800413515830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. E. (2015). The censor’s hand: The misregulation of human-subjects research. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262028912.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, J., & Drake, D. H. (2013). Emotional engagements: On sinking and swimming in prison research and ethnography. Criminal Justice Matters, 91, 24–25.10.1080/09627251.2013.778755
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E. W. (1980). The socio-spatial dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70, 207–225.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (2013). Climate change, relational vulnerability and human security: Rethinking sustainable adaptation in agrarian environments. Climate and Development, 5, 318–327.10.1080/17565529.2013.830954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilove, J. (2002). Minority prison inmates skew local populations as states redistrict. Newhouse News Service. Retrieved December 20, 2005, from http://www.newhousenews.com/archive/story1a031202.html
   Google Scholar
• Travis, J. (2001). But they all come back: Rethinking prisoner reentry. Corrections Management Quarterly, 5, 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). R-words: Refusing research. In D. Paris & M. T. Winn (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 223–248). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ugelvik, T. (2014a). Power and resistance in prison: Doing time, doing freedom. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137307866
   Google Scholar
• Ugelvik, T. (2014b). Prison ethnography as lived experience: Notes from the diaries of a beginner let loose in Oslo prison. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 471–480.10.1177/1077800413516272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2002). The curious eclipse of prison ethnography in the age of mass incarceration. Ethnography, 3, 371–397.10.1177/1466138102003004012
   Google Scholar
• Watts, M. J., & Bohle, H. G. (1993). The space of vulnerability: The structure of hunger and famine. Progress in Human Geography, 17, 43–67.10.1177/030913259301700103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar