References

• Alcoff, L. (1991–1992). The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique (Winter), 20, 5–31.10.2307/1354221
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, D., & Blackburn, S. (2004). Telling lives in India: Biography, autobiography and life history. Delhi: Permanent Black.
   Google Scholar
• Baillie Smith, M., & Jenkins, K. (2011). Disconnections and exclusions: Professionalization, cosmopolitanism and (global?) civil society. Global Networks, 11, 160–179.10.1111/j.1471-0374.2011.00317.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillie Smith, M., & Jenkins, K. (2012). Existing at the interface: Indian NGO activists as strategic cosmopolitans. Antipode, 44, 640–662.10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00888.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillie Smith, M., Laurie, N., Hopkins, P., & Olson, E. (2013). International volunteering, faith and subjectivity: Negotiating cosmopolitanism, citizenship and development. Geoforum, 45, 126–135.10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bankoff, G. (2001). Rendering the world unsafe: ‘Vulnerability’ as western discourse. Disasters, 25, 19–35.10.1111/disa.2001.25.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batliwala, S. (2002). Grassroots movements as transnational actors: Implications for global civil society. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Non-profit Organizations, 13, 393–409.10.1023/A:1022014127214
   Google Scholar
• Behar, R. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, C., & Gabay, C. (2009). Transnational political action and ‘Global Civil Society’ in practice: The case of Oxfam. Global Networks, 9, 1470–2266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgos, E. (1994). Me Llamo Rigoberta Menchú y Así me Nació la Conciencia [I, Rigoberta Menchu]. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno.
   Google Scholar
• Chacko, E. (2004). Positionality and praxis: Fieldwork experiences in rural India. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 25, 51–63.10.1111/j.0129-7619.2004.00172.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P. (2008). Democracy and economic transformation in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 42, 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cotterill, P., & Letherby, G. (1993). Weaving stories: Personal auto/biographies in feminist research. Sociology, 27, 67–79.10.1177/003803859302700107
   Google Scholar
• Crush, J. (Ed.). (1995). Power of development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, A. (2009). Places of everyday cosmopolitanisms: East European construction workers in London. Environment and Planning A, 41, 353–370.10.1068/a40211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, K. V. L. (1994). Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer, 46, 80–89.10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Chichester: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Findlay, A. M. (2005). Editorial: Vulnerable spatialities. Population, Space and Place, 11, 429–439.10.1002/(ISSN)1544-8452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, S. (1986). Women’s life histories: Method and content. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11, 334–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidwani, V. K. (2006). Subaltern cosmopolitanism as politics. Antipode, 38, 7–21.10.1111/anti.2006.38.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F. (2009). Intersubjectivity: Towards a dialogical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40, 19–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluck, S. B., & Patai, D. (Eds.). (1991). Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, J. (2006). Questioning the subject in biographical interviewing. Sociological Research Online, 11. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/11/3/harding.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, G. (2001). Development critiques in the 1990s: culs de sac and promising paths. Progress in Human Geography, 25, 649–658.10.1191/030913201682689002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, K. (2014). Making the extraordinary everyday: Women anti-mining activists’ narratives of staying put and carrying on in Peru and Ecuador. Paper presented at the Society for Latin American Studies Annual Conference 2014, London.
   Google Scholar
• Kachru, B. B. (1986). The Indianization of English. English Today, 2, 31–33.10.1017/S026607840000198X
   Google Scholar
• Kagitcibasi, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 403–422.10.1177/0022022105275959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, M. (2003). Global civil society : An answer to war. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, U. (2005). From colonial administration to development studies: A post-colonial critique of the history of development studies. In U. Kothari (Ed.), A radical history of development studies (pp. 47–66). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, U. (2008). Global peddlers and local networks: Migrant cosmopolitanisms. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 500–516.10.1068/dcos2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larner, W., & Laurie, N. (2010). Travelling technocrats, embodied knowledges: Globalising privatisation in telecoms and water. Geoforum, 41, 218–226.10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (2008). Crossing the boundaries between ‘Third Sector’ and state: Life-work histories from the Philippines, Bangladesh and the UK. Third World Quarterly, 29, 125–141.10.1080/01436590701726582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D., & Mosse, D. (Eds.). (2006). Development brokers and translators: The ethnography of aid and agencies. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849209861
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong, P. (2010). Performing qualitative cross cultural research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812705
   Google Scholar
• Lind, A. (2003). Feminist post-development thought: “Women in Development” and the gendered paradoxes of survival in Bolivia. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 31, 227–246.
   Google Scholar
• Manzo, K. (2008). Imaging humanitarianism: NGO identity and the iconography of childhood. Antipode, 40, 632–657.10.1111/anti.2008.40.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawdsley, E., Townsend, J. G., Porter, G., & Oakley, P. (2002). Knowledge, power and development agendas: NGOs North and South. Oxford: INTRAC.
   Google Scholar
• Maxey, I. (1999). Beyond boundaries? Activism, academia, reflexivity and research. Area, 31, 199–208.10.1111/area.1999.31.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, K. (2007). Postdevelopment, professionalism, and the politics of participation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97, 772–785.10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00582.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, K. (2008). Taking post-development theory to the field: Issues in development research, Northern Thailand. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 49, 281–293.10.1111/j.1467-8373.2008.00377.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., & Crush, J. (1993). Personal narratives as interactive texts: Collecting and interpreting migrant life-histories. Professional Geographer, 45, 95–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairn, K., Munro, J., & Smith, A. B. (2005). A counter-narrative of a ‘failed’ interview. Qualitative Research, 5, 221–244.10.1177/1468794105050836
   Google Scholar
• Naudé, W., Santos-Paulino, A. U., & McGillivray, M. (2009). Vulnerability in developing countries. Helsinki: United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, G. M., & Kelly, N. (2002). Research as interacting dialogic processes: Implications for reflexivity. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3), article 18. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/831/1806RUSSELL
   Google Scholar
• Shank, S., & Nagar, R. (2013). Retelling stories, resisting dichotomies: Staging identity, marginalization and activism in Minneapolis and Sitapur. In L. Peake & M. Rieker (Eds.), Rethinking feminist interventions into the urban (pp. 90–107) Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slim, H., & Thompson, P. (1993). Listening for a change: Oral testimony and development. London: Panos Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. A. (1999). Why write an expose of Rigoberta Menchu? Latin American Perspectives, 26, 15–28.10.1177/0094582X9902600602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1996). Problematising language: Limitations and possibilities in ‘foreign language’ research. Area, 28, 160–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twyman, C., Morrison, J., & Sporton, D. (1999). The final fifth: Autobiography, reflexivity and interpretation in cross-cultural research. Area, 31, 313–325.10.1111/area.1999.31.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNDP. (2014). Human development report 2014: Sustaining progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Viezzer, M. (1977). ‘Si me permiten hablar’: Testimonio de Domitila, una mujer de las minas [If I may be allowed to speak: Testimony of Domitila, a woman from the mines]. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, J. (2011). Reflections on being a recipient of care: Vexing the concept of vulnerability. Social and Cultural Geography, 12, 573–588.10.1080/14649365.2011.601237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarrow, T. (2008). Life/history: Personal narratives of development amongst NGO workers and activists in Ghana. Africa, 78, 334–358.10.3366/E0001972008000211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar