References

• Allan, G. (2001). Personal relationships in late modernity. Personal Relationships, 8, 325–339.10.1111/pere.2001.8.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, G. (2008). Flexibility, friendship, and family. Personal Relationships, 15, 1–16.10.1111/pere.2008.15.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. (1954/1979). The nature of prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 25th Anniversary edition.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2002). Ethnicity and the multicultural city: Living with diversity. Environment and Planning A, 34, 959–980.10.1068/a3537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amir, Y. (1969). Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 319–342.10.1037/h0027352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arentze, T., & Timmermans, H. (2008). Social networks, social interactions, and activity-travel behavior: A framework for microsimulation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35, 1012–1027.10.1068/b3319t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., & Kintrea, K. (2000). Owner-occupation, social mix and neighbourhood impacts. Policy & Politics, 28, 93–108.10.1332/0305573002500857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axhausen, K. W. (2008). social networks, mobility biographies, and travel: Survey challenges. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35, 981–996.10.1068/b3316t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2005). Liquid life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bekerman, Z. (2007). Rethinking intergroup encounters: rescuing praxisfrom theory, activity from education, and peace/co-existence from identity and culture. Journal of Peace Education, 4, 21–37.10.1080/17400200601171198
   Google Scholar
• Blaauboer, M. (2011). The impact of childhood experiences and family members outside the household on residential environment choices. Urban Studies, 48, 1635–1650.10.1177/0042098010377473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M., & Schwartz, J. E. (1984). Crosscutting social circles: Testing a macrostructural theory of intergroup relations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blokland, T. (2003). Urban bonds: Social relationships an inner city neighbourhood (L. K. Mitzman, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, G. S. (2002). Turkish and Moroccan couples and their first steps on the Dutch housing market: Co-residence or independence? Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 17, 269–292.10.1023/A:1020297016480
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, G. S., Van Kempen, R., & van Ham, M. (2008). Minority ethnic groups in the dutch housing market: Spatial segregation. Relocation Dynamics and Housing Policy, Urban Studies, 45, 1359–1384.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, G., Phillips, D., & van Kempen, R. (2010). Housing policy, (De)segregation and social mixing. An International Perspective, 25, 129–135.
   Google Scholar
• Boterman, W. R. (2013). Dealing with diversity: Middle-class family households and the issue of ‘black’ and ‘white’ schools in Amsterdam. Urban Studies, 50, 1130–1147.10.1177/0042098012461673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco, J., & Miller, E. J. (2009). The social dimension in action: A multi-level, personal networks model of social activity frequency between individuals. Transportation Research Part A, 43, 90–104.
   Google Scholar
• CBS Statline. (2011). Online database Netherlands statistics. Retrieved November 9, 2012; July 16, 2014, from http://statline.cbs.nl/statweb
   Google Scholar
• Chorus, J. (2010). Afri: Leven in een Migrantenwijk. Amsterdam: Olympus.
   Google Scholar
• Conradson, D., & Latham, A. (2010). Friendship, networks and transnationality in a world city: Antipodean transmigrants in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 287–305.
   Google Scholar
• Dagevos, J. (2006). Hoge (jeugd)werkloosheid onder etnische minderheden [High (youth) unemployment among ethnic minorities]. The Hague: SCP.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, K., & Bolt, G. S. (2005). Social cohesion in post-war estates in the Netherlands: Differences between socio-economic and ethnic groups. Urban Studies, 42, 2447–2470.10.1080/00420980500380360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijst, M. J. (1999). Two-earner families and their action-spaces: A case study of two Dutch communities. GeoJournal, 48, 195–206.10.1023/A:1007031809319
   Google Scholar
• Dijst, M. J. (2006). Oratie: Stilstaan bij beweging: Over veranderende relaties tussen steden en mobiliteit. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Dijst, M. J. (2009). ICT and social networks: Towards a situational perspective on the interaction between corporeal and connected presence. In R. Kitamura, T. Yoshii, & T. Yamamoto (Eds.), The expanding sphere of travel behaviour research (pp. 45–75). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. C. (2006). The ties that bind and those that don’t: Toward reconciling group threat and contact theories of prejudice. Social Forces, 84, 2179–2204.10.1353/sof.2006.0085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucet, B. (2010). Rich cities with poor people: Waterfront regeneration in the Netherlands and Scotland. Utrecht: Netherlands Geographical Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Drever, Anita (2004). Separate spaces, separate outcomes? Neighbourhood Impacts on Minorities in Germany, Urban Studies, 41, 1423–1439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, N. (1991). The society of individuals. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. W. (2011). The politics of home: Belonging and Nostalgia in Western Europe and the United States. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230305076
   Google Scholar
• Dyck, I., & Kearns, R. A. (2006). Structuration theory: Agency, structure and everyday life. In S. Aitken & G. Valentine (eds.), Approaches to human geography (pp. 86–97). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Feijten, P. (2005). Life events and the housing career: A retrospective analysis of timed effects. Delft: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. (2007). Neighbourhood social mix as a goal of housing policy: A theoretical analysis. European Journal of Housing Policy, 7, 19–43.10.1080/14616710601132526
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). Time, space & regionalization. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration (pp. 110–119). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gijsberts, M., & Dagevos, J.. (2007a). Interventies voor Integratie: Het tegengaan van etnische concentratie en bevorderen van interetnisch contact [Interventions for integration: Countering ethnic concentration and promoting inter-ethnic contact]. The Hague: SCP.
   Google Scholar
• Gijsberts, M., & Dagevos, J. (2007b). The socio-cultural integration of ethnic minorities in the Netherlands: Identifying neighbourhood effects on multiple integration outcomes. Housing Studies, 22, 805–831.10.1080/02673030701474768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, I. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerstrand, T. (1967). Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hägerstrand, T. (1970). What about the people in regional science? Presidential address. Ninth European congress of the regional science association. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 24, 6–21.10.1007/BF01936872
   Google Scholar
• Hägerstrand, T. (1975). Space, time and human condition. In A. Karlquist, et al. (Eds.), Dynamic allocation of urban space (pp. 3–14). Wermeads: Saxon House.
   Google Scholar
• Hamm, J. V. (2000). Do birds of a feather flock together? The variable bases for African American, Asian American, and European American adolescents’ selection of similar friends, developmental psychology, 36, 209–219.
   Google Scholar
• Hannerz, U. (1980). Exploring the city: Towards an urban anthropology. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heringa, A. M., Bolt, G. S., Dijst, M. J., & van Kempen, R. (2014). Individual activity patterns and the meaning of residential environments for inter-ethnic contact. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 105, 64–78.10.1111/tesg.2014.105.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations ( 2nd ed.). Thousend Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Huijnk, W., & Dagevos, J. (2012). Dichter bij elkaar? De sociaal-culturele positie van niet-westerse migranten in Nederland [Closer together? The social-cultural position of non-western migrants in the Netherlands]. The Hague: SCP.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, P. (2008). Comparing responses to ethnic segregation in urban Europe. Urban Studies, 45, 1333–1358.10.1177/0042098008090677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, L., Harris, C., & Valentine, G. (2017). Rethinking concepts of the strange and the stranger. Social & Cultural Geography, 18(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M. P. (2012). The uncertain geographic context problem. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102, 958–968.10.1080/00045608.2012.687349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanzendorf, M. (2003, August 1–15). Mobility biographies: A new perspective for understanding travel behaviour. Conference Paper 10th international conference of Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, P. V. (1988). Homogeneity in confiding relations. Social Networks, 10, 57–76.10.1016/0378-8733(88)90010-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1956). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Matejskova, T., & Leitner, H. (2011). Urban encounters with difference: The contact hypothesis and immigrant integration projects in eastern Berlin. Social & Cultural Geography, 12, 717–741.10.1080/14649365.2011.610234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollenhorst, G. (2009). Networks in contexts: How meeting-opportunities affect personal relationships. Enschede: Ipskamp Drukkers.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, C. H. (1993). Migration dynamics: A life course approach. Amsterdam: Pdod.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, T., & Smets, P. (2009). Welcome to the neighbourhood: Social contacts between Iraqis and natives in Arnhem. Local Environment, 14, 403–415.10.1080/13549830902903682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musterd, S., & Ostendorf, W. (2009). Residential segregation and integration in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35, 1515–1532.10.1080/13691830903125950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, G. (2013). Cosmopolitan habits: The capacities and habits of intercultural conviviality. Body & Society, 19, 162–185.10.1177/1357034X12474477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. (2010). Minority ethnic segregation, Integration and citizenship: A European Perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 209–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piekut, A., & Valentine, G. (2017). Spaces of encounter and attitudes towards difference: A comparativestudy of two European cities. Social Science Research, 62, 175–188.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pred, A. (1981). Social reproduction and the time-geography of everyday life. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 63, 5–22.10.2307/490994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puwar, N. (2004). Space Invaders: Race. Gender and Bodies Out of Place. Oxford & New York: Bergpublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sam, D. L., & Berry, J. W. (2010). Acculturation: When individuals and groups of different cultural backgrounds meet. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 472–481.10.1177/1745691610373075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnell, I., & Harpaz, M. (2005). A model of a heterogeneous neighborhood. GeoJournal, 64, 105–115.10.1007/s10708-005-4093-0
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38, 207–226.10.1068/a37268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, P. (2005). Living apart or together? Multiculturalism at a neighbourhood level, Community Development Journal, 41, 293–306.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. W. (2002). Measuring inter-racial friendships. Social Science Research, 31, 576–593.10.1016/S0049-089X(02)00015-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, L., & Pahl, R. (2006). Rethinking friendship: Hidden solidarities today. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spykman, N. J. (2009). The social theory of Georg Simmel. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Storms, O., & Bartels, E. (2008). ‘De keuze van een huwelijkspartner’: Een studie naar partnerkeuze onder groepen Amsterdammers. Amsterdam: Free University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T., van Kempen, R., Raco, M., & Bolt, G. (2014). Towards hyper-diversified european cities: A critical literature review. Found online [quoted October 8, 2014]. Retrieved from http://www.urbandivercities.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/20140121_Towards_HyperDiversified_European_Cities.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tönnies, F. (1887/2005). Gemeinschaft Und Gesellschaft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2002). Mobility & proximity. Sociology, 36, 255–274.10.1177/0038038502036002002
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 323–337.10.1177/0309133308089372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Duin, C., Stoeldraijer, L., & Garssen, J. (2013). Bevolkingsstrends 2013 Huishoudensprognose 2013–2060. The Hague: Netherlands Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, G. (2010). Unequal networks. Spatial segregation, relationships and inequality in the city. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L., & Maclennan, D. (2012). Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer Science.10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2
   Google Scholar
• Van Heelsum, A., Tillie, J., & Fennema, M. (1999). Turkse organisaties in Nederland: Een netwerkanalyse. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis Publishers
   Google Scholar
• van Kempen, R., & Bolt, G. S. (2009). Social cohesion, social mix, and urban policies in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing & the Built Environment, 24, 457–475.10.1007/s10901-009-9161-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oord, L. (2008). After culture: Intergroup encounters in education. Journal of Research in International Education, 7, 131–147.10.1177/1475240908091301
   Google Scholar
• Verbrugge, L. M. (1977). The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces, 56, 576–597.10.2307/2577741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic And Racial Studies, 30, 1024–1054.10.1080/01419870701599465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, K. (2014). Navigating the neighbourhood: How youths deal with displacement and life in a deprived neighbourhood. Self-published PhD-thesis, Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. (2001). Physical space and cyberspace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, 227–252.10.1111/ijur.2001.25.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessendorf, S. (2013). Commonplace diversity and the ‘ethos of mixing’: Perceptions of difference in a London neighbourhood. Identities, 20, 407–422.10.1080/1070289X.2013.822374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, H. F. (2014). Multicultural learning: Parent encounters with difference in a Birmingham primary school. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39, 102–114.10.1111/tran.2013.39.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yücesoy, E. Ü. (2006). Everyday urban public space: Turkish immigrant women’s perspective. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zorlu, A. (2009). Ethnic differences in spatial mobility: The impact of family ties. Population, Space and Place, 15, 323–342.10.1002/psp.v15:4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar