References

• Adeola, F. (2000). Cross-national environmental injustice and human rights issues: A review of evidence in the developing world. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 686–706.10.1177/00027640021955496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.1215/9780822386735
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2012). Affect and biopower: Towards a politics of life. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 28–43.10.1111/tran.2011.37.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., & Adey, P. (2012). Governing events and life: ‘Emergency’ in UK civil contingencies. Political Geography, 31, 24–33.10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett, G., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Silva, C. (1996). On-site storage of high level nuclear waste: Attitudes and perceptions of local residents. Risk Analysis, 16, 309–319.10.1111/risk.1996.16.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., & Simmons, P. (2009). Absencing/presencing risk: Rethinking proximity and experience of living with major technological hazards. Geoforum, 40, 864–872.10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, B. P. (2014). A new urban dispositif? Governing life in an age of climate change. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32, 49–64.10.1068/d4313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, M., & Grove, K. (2009). Biopolitics, biopower, and the return of sovereignty. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27, 489–507.10.1068/d3508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, S. J. (2009). Topologies of power Foucault’s analysis of political government beyond ‘governmentality’. Theory Culture & Society, 26, 78–108.10.1177/0263276409347694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. (2008). Life as surplus: Biotechnology and capitalism in the neoliberal era. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D., & Freudenburg, W. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior, 28, 302–339.10.1177/0013916596283003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. S. (2005). ‘Is it really safe? That’s what we want to know’: Science, stories and dangerous places. Professional Geographer, 57, 213–221.10.1111/j.0033-0124.2005.00473.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. S. (2007). Scales of Eden: Conservation and pristine devastation on Bikini Atoll. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 213–235.10.1068/d1405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, M., & Lobo-Guerrero, L. (2008). Biopolitics of security in the 21st century: An introduction. Review of International Studies, 34, 265–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, M., & Reid, J. (2009). The liberal way of war: Killing to make life live. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Driedger, S., Eyles, J., Elliott, S. D., & Cole, D. C.  (2002). Constructing scientific authorities: Issue framing of chlorinated disinfection byproducts in public health. Risk Analysis, 22, 789–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmhirst, R. (2011). Introducing new feminist political ecologies. Geoforum, 42, 129–132.10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, E. (2013). Fukushima: Catastrophe, compensation, and justice in Japan. DePaul Law Review, 62, 335–355.
   Google Scholar
• Finucane, M., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Flynn, J., & Satterfield, T. A.  (2000). Gender, race, and perceived risk: The white male effect. Health Risk & Society, 2, 159–172.10.1080/713670162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluri, J. (2012). Capitalizing on bare life: Sovereignty, exception, and gender politics. Antipode, 44, 31–50.10.1111/anti.2012.44.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2003). ‘Society must be defended’: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). Birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, K. (2014). Agency, affect, and the immunological politics of disaster resilience. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32, 240–256.10.1068/d4813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, P. (1998). Gender differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. Risk Analysis, 18, 805–811.10.1023/B:RIAN.0000005926.03250.c0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes-Conroy, J., & Hayes-Conroy, A. (2013). Veggies and visceralities: The political ecology of food and feeling. Emotion, Space, and Society, 6, 81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herod, A. (2011). What does the 2011 Japanese tsunami tell us about the nature of the global economy? Social and Cultural Geography, 12, 829–837.10.1080/14649365.2011.629301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (1999). The songlines of risk. Environmental Values, 8, 135–152.10.3197/096327199129341761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura, A. (2013). Standards as hybrid forum: Comparison of the Post-Fukushima radiation standards by a consumer cooperative, the private sector, and the Japanese government. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture & Food, 20, 11–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura, A. (2015). Risk communication programs after the Fukushima nuclear accident: A comparison of epistemic cultures ( United Nations University Working Paper Series), New York, United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura, A. H., & Katano, Y. (2014). Farming after the Fukushima accident: A feminist political ecology analysis of organic agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 108–116.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyama, R. (2012). Farmland radiation dose distribution map and food safety inspection systematization. Retrieved from http://ir.lib.fukushima-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10270/3731/1/3-1780.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Koyama, R. (2013). The influence and damage caused by the nuclear disaster on Fukushima’s agriculture. Retrieved from http://ir.lib.fukushima-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10270/3795/1/3-1797.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krupar, S. (2013). Hot spotter’s report: Military fables of toxic waste. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuletz, V. (1998). The tainted desert: Environmental ruin in the American West. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarato, M. (2002). From biopower to biopolitics. Pli: The Warwick Journal of Philosophy, 13, 99–113.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (2005). ‘A zone of indistinction’ – A critique of Giorgio Agamben’s concept of biopolitics. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 7, 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Martini, E. (2015). Proving grounds: Militarized landscapes, weapons testing and the environmental impact of US bases. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2009). National enterprise emergency steps toward an ecology of powers. Theory, Culture & Society, 26, 153–185.10.1177/0263276409347696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBeth, M., & Oakes, A. (1996). Citizen perceptions of risks associated with moving radiological waste. Risk Analysis, 16, 421–427.10.1111/risk.1996.16.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCurry, J. (2017). Fukushima nuclear reactor radiation at highest level since 2011 meltdown. Published on February 3. Retrieved February 4, from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/feb/03/fukushima-daiichi-radiation-levels-highest-since-2011-meltdown
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (2012). The Fukushima nuclear crisis and the fight for compensation. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 10(10), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Minca, C. (2006). Giorgio Agamben and the new biopolitical nomos. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 88, 387–403.10.1111/geob.2006.88.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Mori, M. (2008). Environmental pollution and bio-politics: The epistemological constitution in Japan’s 1960s. Geoforum, 39, 1466–1479.10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morioka, R. (2014). Gender difference in the health risk perception of radiation from Fukushima in Japan: The role of hegemonic masculinity. Social Science & Medicine, 107, 105–112.10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morioka, R. (2015). Gender difference in risk perception following the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster ( United Nations University Working Paper Series), New York, United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, S. (2006). Thanatopolitics: On the use of death for mobilizing political life. Polygraph An International Journal of Politics and Culture, 18, 191–215.
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, A. (2011). Bounding difference: Intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal. Geoforum, 42, 129–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osnos, E. (2011). The fallout. New Yorker, 17, 46–59.
   Google Scholar
• Ozasa, K., Shimizu, Y., Suyama, A., Kasagi, F., Soda, M., Grant, E. J., & Kodama, K. (2011). Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors, report 14, 1950-2003: An overview of cancer and noncancer diseases. Radiation Research, 177, 229–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacchioli, D. (2013). Communication in the Fukushima crisis: How did officials, scientists, and the media perform? Oceanus, 50, 24–26.
   Google Scholar
• Povinelli, E. (2008). The child in the broom closet: States of killing and letting die. South Atlantic Quarterly, 107, 509–530.10.1215/00382876-2008-004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petryna, A. (2013). Life exposed: Biological citizens after Chernobyl. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400845095
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, S. (2002). Half-lives and healthy bodies: Discourses on ‘contaminated’ food and healing in post-Chernobyl Ukraine. Food and Foodways, 10, 27–53.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R., & Slovic, P. (2003). The social amplification of risk. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.10.1017/CBO9780511550461
   Google Scholar
• Rondeau, K., & McIntyre, L. (2010). ‘I know what’s gone into it’: Canadian farmwomen’s conceptualization of food safety. Health Risk & Society, 12, 211–229.10.1080/13698571003710357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, D., Morioka, R., & Danzuka, H. (2014). Micro-politics of radiation. Critical Asian Studies, 46, 485–508.10.1080/14672715.2014.935138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, P., & Peters, K. (2015). Wet ontologies, fluid spaces: Giving depth to volume through oceanic thinking. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33, 247–264.10.1068/d14148p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultana, F. (2011). Suffering for water, suffering from water: Emotional geographies of resource access, control, and conflict. Geoforum, 42, 129–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvester, C. (2006). Bare life as a development/postcolonial problematic. The Geographical Journal, 172, 66–77.10.1111/geoj.2006.172.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venn, C., & Terranova, T. (2009). Introduction: Thinking after Michel Foucault. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 1–11.10.1177/0263276409353776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D., & Baverstock, K. (2006). Chernobyl and the future: Too soon for a final diagnosis. Nature, 440, 993–994.10.1038/440993a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2003). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar