Seeing, feeling, and showing ‘bodies-in-place’: exploring reflexivity and the multisensory body through videography

References

• Barker, J. (2009). The tactile eye: Touch and the cinematic experience‬. Berkeley: University of California Press.‬‬‬‬
   Google Scholar
• Bondi, L. (2003). Empathy and identification: Conceptual resources for feminist fieldwork. ACME, 2(1), 64–76.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Degen, M., & Rose, G. (2012). The sensory experiencing of urban design: The role of walking and perceptual memory. Urban Studies, 49, 3271–3287.10.1177/0042098012440463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. (2000). Walking in the British countryside: Reflexivity, embodied practices and ways to escape. Body & Society, 6(3–4), 81–106.10.1177/1357034X00006003005
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. A. (2004). Experiential learning, spatial practice, and critical urban geographies. Journal of Geography, 103(2), 55–63.10.1080/00221340408978576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• France, D., & Wakefield, K. (2011). How to produce a digital story. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(4), 617–623.10.1080/03098265.2011.560658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. L. (2011). Videographic geographies: Using digital video for geographic research. Progress in Human Geography, 35(4), 521–541.10.1177/0309132510388337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. L. (2013). Worlds through glass: Photography and video as geographic method. In K. Ward (Ed.), Researching the city (pp. 135–152). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Geurts, K. L. (2002). Culture and the senses: Embodiment, identity, and well-being in an African community. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J.-K. (2004). Area studies after poststructuralism. Environment and Planning A,36, 405–419.10.1068/a3652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillen, J. (2016). Streets of fire: Motorbike mobilities in Vietnam. Area, 48(1), 64–69.10.1111/area.12225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, M. R. (2014). Encouraging reflexivity in urban geography fieldwork: Study abroad experiences in Singapore and Malaysia. Journal of Geography in Higher Education., 38(1), 69–85.10.1080/03098265.2013.836625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, M. R. (2015). Teaching critical reflexivity in short-term international field courses: Practices and problems. Journal of Geography in Higher Education., 39(4), 554–567.10.1080/03098265.2015.1084610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, M. R., & Rose-Redwood, R. (Eds.). (2014). Performativity, politics, and the production of social space. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, D. P. (2014). Walking the global city: The politics of rhythm and memory in Singapore. Space and Culture, 17(1), 16–28.10.1177/1206331212451686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros, F. (2014). A philosophy of walking. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, H., & Straughan, E. R. (2014). Nano-art, dynamic matter and the sight/sound of touch. Geoforum, 51, 130–139.10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes, D. (2003). Sensual relations: Engaging the senses in culture and social theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.11852
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D. (2005). Introduction. In D. Howes (Ed.), Empire of the senses: The sensory culture reader (pp. 1–17). Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D. (2006). Charting the sensorial revolution. Senses & Society, 1(1), 113–128.10.2752/174589206778055673
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, C., & Lorimer, H. (2013). Sensing the city. Cultural Geographies, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, A. (2003). Research, performance, and doing human geography: Some reflections on the diary-photograph, diary-interview method. Environment and Planning A, 35(11), 1993–2017.10.1068/a3587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, A., & McCormack, D. P. (2007). Digital photography and web-based assignments in an urban field course: Snapshots from Berlin. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(2), 241–256.10.1080/03098260601065110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, A., & McCormack, D. P. (2009). Thinking with images in non-representational cities: Vignettes from Berlin. Area, 41(3), 252–262.10.1111/area.2009.41.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lant, A. (1995). Haptical cinema. October, 74, 45–73.10.2307/778820
   Google Scholar
• Law, L. (2013). Sensing the city. In P. Cloke, P. Crang, & M. Goodwin (Eds.), Introducing human geographies (2nd ed.). (pp. 439–450). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lorimer, H. (2005). Cultural geography: The busyness of being “more-than-representational”. Progress in Human Geography, 29, 83–94.10.1191/0309132505ph531pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, K. E. Y. (2015). The sensuous city: Sensory methodologies in urban ethnographic research. Ethnography, 16(3), 295–312.10.1177/1466138114552938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture and Society, 17(3), 26–54.10.1177/02632760022051202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malam, L., & Grundy-Warr, C. (2011). Liberating learning: Thinking beyond “the grade” in field-based approaches to learning. New Zealand Geographer, 67, 213–221.10.1111/nzg.2011.67.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, L. U. (2000). The skin of the film: Intercultural cinema, embodiment, and the senses. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, L. U. (2002). Touch: Sensuous theory and multisensory media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGuinness, M., & Simm, D. (2005). Going global? Long-haul fieldwork in undergraduate geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29, 241–253.10.1080/03098260500130478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcguinness, M. (2009). Putting themselves in the picture: Using reflective diaries in the teaching of feminist geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(3), 339–349.10.1080/03098260902742425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, S. (2011). The body and the senses: Visual methods, videography and the submarine sensorium. Body and Society, 17(1), 53–72.10.1177/1357034X10394670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2011). Walking paths through postcolonial political geographies. Political Geography, 30, 239–240.10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newstead, C. (2009). Pedagogy, post-coloniality and care-full encounters in the classroom. Geoforum, 40, 80–90.10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. (2009). Haptic geographies: Ethnography, haptic knowledges and sensuous dispositions. Progress in Human Geography, 33(6), 766–788.10.1177/0309132509103155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. (2011). More-than-visual approaches to architecture. Vision, touch, technique. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(3), pp. 263–281. Special issue ‘Practiced Architectures: Spaces, Performances, Events’, Eds. J. Jacobs and P. Merriman.10.1080/14649365.2011.564733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. (2015). On aisthêsis, “inner touch”, and the aesthetics of the moving body. In H. Hawkins & E. Straughan (Eds.), Geographical aesthetics: Imagining space, staging encounters (pp. 35–52). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. (2017). On haptics, tactile interactions, and the possibility of a distinctly ‘haptic media’. New Media and Society, 19(10), 1541–1562. Special Issue: ‘Haptic Media Studies’, Edited by D. Parisi, M. Paterson, & J. Archer.10.1177/1461444817717513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, M., & Glass, M. R. (2015). The world through Glass: Developing novel methods with wearable computing for urban videographic research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(2), 275–287.10.1080/03098265.2015.1010143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, R., & Johns, J. (2012). Fieldwork for human geography. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Richard (2015). Playful and multi-sensory fieldwork: seeing, hearing and touching New York. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(4), 617–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinder, D. (2005). Arts of urban exploration. Cultural Geographies, 12, 383–411.10.1191/1474474005eu347oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2006). The future of visual anthropology: Engaging the senses. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography: Images, media and representation in research. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.10.4135/9780857025029
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2008). An urban tour: The sensory sociality of ethnographic place-making. Ethnography, 9(2), 175–196.10.1177/1466138108089467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2009). Doing sensory ethnography. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446249383
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320.10.1191/030913297673302122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2007). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ruby, J. (1996). Visual anthropology. In D. Levinson & M. Ember (Eds.), Encyclopedia of cultural anthropology (Vol. 4, pp. 1345–1351). New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, J. (1998). Picturing empire: Photography and the visualization of the British empire. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serres, M. (2008). The five senses: A philosophy of mingled bodies. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Sobchack, V. (2004). Carnal thoughts: Embodiment and moving image culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidaway, J. (2009). Shadows on the path: Negotiating geopolitics on an urban section of Britain’s South West Coast Path. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27, 1091–1116.10.1068/d5508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, I. (1998). Lights out for the territory: 9 Excursions into the secret history of London. London: Granta Books.
   Google Scholar
• Solnit, R. (2006). A field guide to getting lost. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. (2006). A place of sense: A kinaesthetic ethnography of cyclists on Mont Ventoux. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24(5), 709–732.10.1068/d66j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. (2011). A chance to catch a breath: Using mobile video ethnography in cycling research. Mobilities, 6(2), 161–182.10.1080/17450101.2011.552771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoller, P. (1997). Sensuous scholarship. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9780812203134
   Google Scholar
• Vannini, P. (2015). Non-representational ethnography: New ways of animating lifeworlds. Cultural Geographies, 22(2), 317–327.10.1177/1474474014555657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergunst, J. (2010). Rhythms of walking: History and presence in a city street. Space and Culture, 13(4), 376–388.10.1177/1206331210374145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volvey, A. (2012). Fieldwork: How to get in(to) touch. Towards a haptic regime of knowledge in geography. In M. Paterson & M. Dodge (Eds.), Touching space, placing touch (pp. 103–130). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. (1988). Reflexivity is the ethnographer of the text. In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of scientific knowledge (pp. 14–36). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin: Symphony of a Great City. Dir. Walther Ruttman. Deutsche Vereins-Film. 1 hr 3 mins. 1927 [Restored version 1 hr 14 mins, 1990].
   Google Scholar
• Leviathan. Dirs. Lucien Castaing-Taylor, Verena Paravel. Cinema Guild. 1 hr 27 mins. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sleep Furiously. Dir. Gideon Koppell. Bard Entertainments. 1 hr 35 mins. 2011.
   Google Scholar