References

• Ault, A. (1996). Ambiguous identity in an unambiguous sex/gender structure: The case of bisexual women. The Sociological Quarterly, 37, 449–463. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1996.tb00748.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. (1995). Bi-sexuality – A place on the margins. In S. Whittle (Ed.), The margins of the city: Gay men’s urban lives (pp. 129–141). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bettani, S. (2015). Straight subjectivities in homonormative spaces: Moving towards a new, ‘dynamic’ heteronormativity? Gender, Place & Culture, 22, 239–254. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2013.855713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowes-Catton, H., Barker, M. J., & Richards, C. (2011). ‘I didn’t know that I could feel this relaxed in my body’: Using visual methods to research bisexual people’s embodied experiences of identity and space. In P. Reavey (Ed.), Visual methods in psychology (pp. 255–270). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. (2007). Autonomy, affinity and play in the spaces of radical queer activism. In K. Browne, J. Lim, & G. Brown (Eds.), Geographies of sexualities: Theory, practices and politics (pp. 195–206). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. (2008). Ceramics, clothing and other bodies: Affective geographies of homoerotic cruising encounters. Social and Cultural Geography, 9, 915–932. doi:10.1080/14649360802441457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Browne, K., & Lim, J. (2007). Introduction, or why have a book on geographies of sexualities. In K. Browne, J. Lim, & G. Brown (Eds.), Geographies of sexualities: Theory, practices and politics (pp. 1–18). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (2000). Closet space: Metaphor from the body to the globe. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, K. (2006). Challenging queer geographies. Antipode, 38, 885–893. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2006.00483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, K. (2007). (Re)making the other, heterosexualising everyday space. Environment and Planning A, 39, 996–1014. doi:10.1068/a38165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, K., & Bakshi, L. (2011). We are here to party? Lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans leisurescapes beyond commercial gay scenes. Leisure Studies, 30, 179–196. doi:10.1080/02614367.2010.506651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doan, P. L. (2010). The tyranny of gendered spaces – Reflections from beyond the gender dichotomy. Gender, Place & Culture, 17, 635–654. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2010.503121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadie, J. (1995). Activating bisexuality: Towards a bi/sexual politics. In J. Bristow & A. R. Wilson (Eds.), Activating theory: Lesbian, gay, bisexual politics (pp. 31–46). London, UK: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Flanders, C. E., LeBreton, M. E., Robinson, M., Bian, J., & Caravaca-Morera, J. (2017). Defining bisexuality: Young bisexual and pansexual people’s voices. Journal of Bisexuality, 17, 39–57. doi:10.1080/15299716.2016.1227016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gad, C., & Jensen, C. B. (2014). The promises of practice. The Sociological Review, 62, 698–718. doi:10.1111/1467-964X.12200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, K. A., Ramirez, J. L., & Galupo, M. P. (2017). ‘I was and still am’: Narratives of bisexual marking in the #StillBisexual campaign. Sexuality & Culture, 21, 493–515. doi:10.1007/s12119-016-9401-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman-Murray, A. (2008a). Reconciling self: Gay men and lesbians using domestic materiality for identity management. Social and Cultural Geography, 9, 283–301. doi:10.1080/14649360801990504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman-Murray, A. (2008b). Queering the family home: Narratives from gay, lesbian and bisexual youth coming out in supportive family homes in Australia. Gender, Place and Culture, 15, 31–44. doi:10.1080/09663690701817501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman-Murray, A., Johnston, L., & Waitt, G. (2010). Queer(ing) communication in research relationships: A conversation about subjectivities, methodologies, and ethics. In K. Browne & C. J. Nash (Eds.), Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research (pp. 97–112). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, J. E. (2013). Creating a bisexual display: Making bisexuality visible. Journal of Bisexuality, 13, 39–62. doi:10.1080/15299716.2013.755727
   Google Scholar
• Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., Halliwell, E., & Malson, H. (2013). Visible lesbians and invisible bisexuals: Appearance and visual identities among bisexual women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 40, 172–182. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C. (1997). From landmarks to spaces: Mapping the territory of a bisexual geneaology. In G. B. Ingram, A. M. Bouthillette, & Y. Retter (Eds.), Queers in Space: Communities, public spaces, sites of resistance (pp. 147–162). Seattle, WA: Bay Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, C. (2002). Bisexual spaces: A geography of sexuality and gender. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, M., & Griffin, C. (2003). Being gay, being straight and being yourself. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 6, 404–425. doi:10.1177/13675494030063008
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, P. (2008). Here, there, everywhere: The ubiquitous geographies of heteronormativity. Geography Compass, 2, 640–658. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00096.x
   Google Scholar
• Klein, F., Sepekoff, B., & Wolf, T. (1985). Sexual orientation. Journal of Homosexuality, 11, 35–49. doi:10.1300/J082v11n01_04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, N. M. (2012). Remapping disclosure: Gay men’s segmented journeys of moving out and coming out. Social and Cultural Geography, 13, 211–231. doi:10.1080/14649365.2012.677469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, N. M. (2016). Urban encounters and sexual health among gay and bisexual immigrant men: Perspectives from the settlement and aids service sectors. Geographical Review, 106, 235–256. doi:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2015.12142.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingel, J. (2009). Adjusting the borders: Bisexual passing and queer theory. Journal of Bisexuality, 9, 381–405. doi:10.1080/15299710903316646
   Google Scholar
• Maliepaard, E. (2015a). Bisexual spaces: Exploring geographies of bisexualities. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 14, 217–234. Retrieved from https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1148/916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maliepaard, E. (2015b). Bisexuals in space and geography: More-than-queer? Fennia: International Journal of Geography, 193, 148–159. doi:10.11143/46303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maliepaard, E. (2017a). Bisexual safe space(s) on the internet: Analysis of an online forum for bisexuals. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 108, 318–330. doi:10.1111/tesg.12248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maliepaard, E. (2017b). Bisexuality in the Netherlands: Connecting bisexual passing, communities, and identities. Journal of Bisexuality, 17, 325–348. doi:10.1080/15299716.2017.1342214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, J. (2003). Daily desires: Everyday geographies of bisexual men (Unpublished master thesis). Burnaby: Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, K. (2007). Hiding in the closet? Journal of Sociology, 43, 151–166. doi:10.1177/1440783307076893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, K. (2008). Inside, outside, nowhere: Bisexual men and women in the gay and lesbian community. Journal of Bisexuality, 8, 63–80. doi:10.1080/15299710802143174
   Google Scholar
• Monro, S. (2015). Bisexuality: Identities, politics, and theories. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, C. (2013). The age of the “post-mo”? Toronto’s gay village and a new generation. Geoforum, 49, 243–252. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.11.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, C., & Bain, A. (2007). ‘Reclaiming raunch’? Spatializing queer identities at Toronto women’s bathhouse events. Social and Cultural Geography, 8, 47–62. doi:10.1080/14649360701251809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, C., & Gorman-Murray, A. (2014). LGBT neighbourhoods and ‘New Mobilities’: Towards understanding transformations in sexual and gendered urban landscapes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 756–772. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30, 1391–1418. doi:10.1177/0170840609349875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orne, J. (2011). ‘You will always have to “out” yourself’: Reconsidering coming out through strategic outness. Sexualities, 14, 681–703. doi:10.1177/1363460711420462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswin, N. (2008). Critical geographies and the uses of sexuality: Deconstructing queer space. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 89–103. doi:10.1177/0309132507085213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popova, M. (2017). Inactionable/unspeakable: Bisexuality in the workplace. Journal of Bisexuality, 1–13. doi:10.1080/15299716.2017.1383334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 243–263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Rodó-De-Zárate, M. (2017). Affective inequality and heteronormative discomfort. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 108, 302–317. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (1997). Practices and actions: A Wittgensteinian critique of Bourdieu and Giddens. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 27, 283–308. doi:10.1177/004839319702700301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2000). Wittgenstein and the social context of an individual life. History of the Human Sciences, 13, 93–107. doi:10.1177/09526950022120629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Practice mind-ed orders. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.) The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 42–55). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2008). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social (4th ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2010). The timespace of human activity: On performance, society, and history as indeterminate teleological events. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. (1999). Matter out of place: Visibility and sexualities in leisure spaces. Leisure Studies, 18, 213–232. doi:10.1080/026143699374934
   Google Scholar
• Toft, A., & Yip, A. K. (2018). Intimacy negotiated: The management of relationships and the construction of personal communities in the lives of bisexual women and men. Sexualities, 21, 233–250. doi:10.1177/1363460716679793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. (2007). Theorizing and researching intersectionality: A challenge for feminist geography. The Professional Geographer, 59, 10–21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00587.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, G., & Skelton, T. (2003). Finding oneself, losing oneself: The lesbian and gay ‘scene’ as a paradoxical space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27, 849–866. doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2003.00487.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, G., Skelton, T., & Butler, R. (2003). Coming out and outcomes: Negotiating lesbian and gay identities with, and in, the family. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21, 479–499. doi:10.1068/d277t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, G. (2008). The homonormalisation of white heterosexual leisure spaces in Bloemfontein, South Africa. Geoforum, 39, 1344–1358. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, G., Browne, K., & Gupta, C. (2014). Embracing the “And”: Between queer and bisexual theory at Brighton BiFest. Journal of Homosexuality, 61, 1605–1625. doi:10.1080/00918369.2014.944055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waitt, G., & Gorman-Murray, A. (2011). ‘It’s about time you came out’: Sexualities, mobility and home. Antipode, 43, 1380–1403. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00876.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J., & Winstanley, D. (2005). Coming out at work: Performativity and the recognition and renegotiation of identity. The Sociological Review, 53, 447–475. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00561.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, E. (2013). Learning to love again: ‘Broken families’, citizenship and the state promotion of coupledom. Geoforum, 49, 206–213. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar