References

• Adler, M. A., & Brayfield, A. (2006). Gender regimes and cultures of care: Public support for maternal employment in Germany and the United States. Marriage & Family Review, 39(3/4), 229–253.
   Google Scholar
• Åkerlund, U., & Sandberg, L. (2015). Stories of lifestyle mobility: Representing self and place in the search for the ‘good life’. Social & Cultural Geography, 16(3), 351–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., & McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and geography. Area, 43(2), 124–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J., Kitchin, R., & Leszczynski, A. (2018). Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2014). Gifted places: The inalienable nature of belonging in place. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(4), 658–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke, C. M., Freddolino, P. P., & Mullen, E. E. (2009). Ageing and technology: A review of the research literature. The British Journal of Social Work, 39(4), 641–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunt, A., & Varley, A. (2004). Geographies of home. Cultural Geographies, 11, 3–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, S. (2011). Friendship, co-presence and care: Neglected spaces. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(6), 605–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, S. (2012). Recognising the time-space dimensions of care: Caringscapes and carescapes. Environmnt and Planning A, 44(9), 2101–2118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickell, K. (2012). ‘Mapping’ and ‘doing’ critical geographies of home. Progress in Human Geography, 36, 225–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clancey, G. (2012). Intelligent Island to Biopolis: Sick bodies and millennial turns in Singapore. Science, Technology and Society, 17(1), 13–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloutier, D. S., Martin-Matthews, A., Byrne, K., & Wolse, F. (2015). The space between: Using ‘relational ethics’ and ‘relational space’ to explore relationship-building between care providers and care recipients in the home space. Social & Cultural Geography, 16(7), 764–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, T., Kearns, R. A., & Wiles, J. (2016). Older adults’ experiences of home maintenance issues and opportunities to maintain ageing in place. Housing Studies, 31(8), 964–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, J., & Walton-Roberts, M. (2016). What about the workers? The missing geographies of health care. Progress in Human Geography, 40(2), 158–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conradson, D. (2003). Geographies of care: Spaces, practices and experiences. Social & Cultural Geography, 4, 451–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couclelis, H. (2009). Rethinking time geography in the information age. Environment and Planning A, 41, 1556–1575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (2013). Gendered spaces of commoditised care. Social & Cultural Geography, 14(5), 491–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, S., Gesler, W., Fabian, K., Francis, S., & Priebe, S. (2007). Therapeutic landscapes in hospital design: A qualitative assessment by staff and service users of the design of a new mental health inpatient unit. Environment and Planning C, 25, 591–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Silva, M. (2017a). Making the emotional connection: Transnational eldercare circulation within Sri Lankan-Australian transnational families. Gender, Place and Culture. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Silva, M. (2017b). The care pentagon: Older adults within Sri Lankan-Australian transnational families and their landscapes of care. Population, Space and Place, 23, e2061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, C. (2010). On the role of affect and practice in the production of place. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(5), 881–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyck, I., Kontos, P., Angus, J., & McKeever, P. (2005). The home as a site for long-term care: Meanings and management of bodies and spaces. Health & Place, 11, 173–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, K. (2000). ‘It’s really hitting home’: The home as a site for long-term health care. Women and Environments International Magazine, 48/49, 25.
   Google Scholar
• England, K., & Dyck, I. (2012). Migrant workers in home care: Routes, responsibilities, and respect. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(5), 1076–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, M. (2015). Cultures of Care. In J. Twigg & W. Martin (Eds.), Routledge handbook of cultural gerontology (pp. 269–276). Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B., & Kearns, R. (2001). Remoralising landscapes of care. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19(1), 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M., & Lawson, V. (2011). Recentring care: Interrogating the commodification of care. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(6), 639–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, C. (2015). Hospital closures: The sociospatial restructuring of labor and health care. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(5), 1094–1110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The culture of politics: Traditional, postmodern, cold-modern and warm-modern ideals of care. In A. R. Hochschild (Ed.), The commercialization of intimate life: Notes from home and work. Berkeley: University of California Press, 331-346.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S., Thang, L. L., & Toyota, M. (2012). Transnational mobilities for care: Rethinking the dynamics of care in Asia. Global Networks, 12(2), 129–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaika, M. (2004). Interrogating the geographies of the familiar: Domesticating nature and constructing the autonomy of the modern home. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(2), 265–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaika, M., & Swynegdouw, E. (2000). Fetishizing the modern city: The phantasmagoria of urban technological networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(1), 120–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, L., & Woods, O. (2018a). Smart eldercare in Singapore: Negotiating agency and apathy at the margins. Journal of Aging Studies, 47, 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, L., & Woods, O. (2018b). The ideological alignment of smart urbanism in Singapore: Critical reflections on a political paradox. Urban Studies, 55(4), 679–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lager, D., Van Hoven, B., & Huigen, P. (2016). Rhythms, ageing and neighbourhoods. Environment and Planning A, 48(8), 1565–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, V. (2007). Geographies of care and responsibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, C., Mennecozzi, C., Not, E., Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M., Gennai, F., & Cristoforetti, A. (2009). Knocking on elders’ door: Investigating the functional and emotional geography of their domestic space. Proceedings of CHI, 2009, 1703–1711. Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. (2016). Speculative futures: Cities, data, and governance beyond smart urbanism. Environment and Planning A, 48(9), 1691–1708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levande, D. I., Herrick, J. M., & Sung, K.-T. (2000). Eldercare in the United States and South Korea: Balancing family and community support. Journal of Family Issues, 21(5), 632–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhurst, R. (2017). Reflecting on regendering care at different scales: Bodies, home, community and nation. Dialogues in Human Geography, 7(1), 79–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lulle, A., & King, R. (2015). Ageing well: The time-space of possibility for older female Latvian migrants in the UK. Social & Cultural Geography, 17(3), 444–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque-Ayala, A., & Marvin, S. (2015). Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism? Urban Studies, 52(12), 2105–2116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattingley, D. J. (2001). The home and the world: Domestic service and international networks of caring labor. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(2), 370–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKie, L., Gregory, S., & Bowlby, S. (2002). Shadow times: The temporal and spatial frameworks and experiences of caring and working. Sociology, 36, 897–924.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, K. K., & Ho, K. (2004). Filial piety revisited in the context of modernizing Asian societies. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 4(S1), S77–S78.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, C. (2000). ‘Bearing the burden’: Towards a restructured geography of caring. Area, 32(1), 49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, C. (2001). Geographies of care: Space, place and the voluntary sector. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, C. (2005). From home to ‘home’: Situating emotions within the caregiving experience. Environment and Planning A, 37, 2105–2120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, C., & Wiles, J. (2010). Landscapes of care. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 736–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Culture. (1984). Report of the committee on the problems of the aged. Retrieved from http://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/data/pdfdoc/755-1984-03-23.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ochiai, E. (2009). Care diamonds and welfare regimes in East and Southeast Asian societies: Bridging family and welfare sociology. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 18(1), 60–78.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G. (1992). Counting care: Numbers and types of informal caregivers. In J. Twigg (Ed.), Carers: Research and practice (pp. 6–29). London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Parvati, R. (2016). Locating care ethics beyond the Global North. ACME: an International Journal for Critical Geographies, 15(3), 511–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, A., & Hall, E. (2018). Placing care in times of austerity. Social & Cultural Geography, 19(3), 303–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, R. (2016). The space in between: Mobile policy and the topographies and topologies of the technocracy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(3), 420–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseneil, S., & Budgeon, S. (2004). Cultures of intimacy and care beyond ‘the family’: Personal life and social change in the early 21st century. Current Sociology, 52(2), 135–159.
   Google Scholar
• Rozario, P. A., & Rosetti, A. L. (2012). “Many helping hands”: A review and analysis of long-term care policies, programs, and practices in Singapore. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 55, 641–658.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schultz, J. S., André, B., & Sjøvold, E. (2016). Managing innovation in healthcare: A glimpse into what and how public healthcare organizations are planning to deliver healthcare services for their future elderly. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 9(3), 169–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, R., Wahl, H.-W., Matthews, J. T., Dabbs, A., Beach, S. R., & Czaja, S. J. (2015). Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. The Gerontologist, 55(5), 724–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SingStat. (2018a). Births and fertility. Retrieved from: https://www.singstat.gov.sg/finddata/search-by-theme/population/births-andfertility/latest-data
   Google Scholar
• SingStat. (2018b). Death and life expectancy. Retrieved from https://www.singstat.gov.sg/find-data/search-by-theme/population/death-and-lifeexpectancy/latest-data
   Google Scholar
• SingStat. (2018c). Population and population structure. Retrieved from https://www.singstat.gov.sg/find-data/search-by-theme/population/population-andpopulation-structure/latest-data
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (1998). Residential separation and patterns of interaction between elderly parents and their adult children. Progress in Human Geography, 22(3), 368–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrant, A. (2013). Grandfathering as spatio-temporal practice: Conceptualizing performances of ageing masculinities in contemporary familial carescapes. Social & Cultural Geography, 14(2), 192–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, P., Chan, A., & Straughan, P. (2003). Providing health care for older persons in Singapore. Health Policy, 64(1), 399–413.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Twigg, J. (1999). The spatial ordering of care: Public and private in bathing support at home. Sociology of Health and Illness, 21(4), 381–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twigg, J. (2000). Carework as a form of bodywork. Ageing and Society, 20, 389–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley, A. (2008). A place like this? Stories of dementia, home, and the self. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 47–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles, J. (2003). Daily geographies of caregivers: Mobility, routine, scale. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 1307–1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiles, J. (2011). Reflections on being a recipient of care: Vexing the concept of vulnerability. Social & Cultural Geography, 12, 573–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A. (2002). Changing geographies of care: Employing the concept of therapeutic landscapes as a framework in examining home space. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 141–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, O. (2018). The digital subversion of urban space: Power, performance and grime. Social & Cultural Geography, 1–21. doi:10.1080/14649365.2018.1491617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, O., & Kong, L. (2017). Mobile cities, modelling policies: Importing/exporting the Singapore ‘model’ of development. In J. R. Short (Ed.), A research agenda for cities (pp. 206–217). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Yeoh, B., & Huang, S. (2014). Singapore’s changing demography, the eldercare predicament and transnational ‘care’ migration. TraNS: Trans-Regional and National Studies of Southeast Asia, 2(2), 247–269.
   Google Scholar
• Yeoh, B., & Huang, S. (2015). Cosmopolitan beginnings? Transnational healthcare workers and the politics of carework in Singapore. The Geographical Journal, 181(3), 249–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar