References

• Åhr, J. (2008). Memory and mourning in Berlin: On Peter Eisenman’s “Holocaust-Mahnmal”. Modern Judaism, 28, 283–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2009). Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society, 2, 77–81.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. (2014). Encountering affect: Capacities, apparatuses, conditions. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, J. (2015). The interface envelope: Gaming, technology, power. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, D. (2014). Post-digital humanities: Computation and cultural critique in the arts and humanities. Educause, May/June, 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bevernage, B., & Wouters, N. (2018). State-sponsored history after 1945: An introduction. In B. Bevernage & N. Wouters (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of state sponsored history after 1945 (pp. 1–36). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. (2001). Thing theory. Critical Inquiry, 28, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camp des Milles. Retreived January 10, 2017,fromhttp://www.campdesmilles.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ciolfi, L., & Banno, L. (2007). Designing hybrid places: Merging interaction design, ubiquitous technologies and geographies of the museum space. CoDesign, 3, 159–180.
   Google Scholar
• Closs Stephens, A., Hughes, S., Schofield, V., & Sumartojo, S. (2017). Atmospheric memories: Affect and minor politics at the ten-year anniversary of the London bombings. Emotion, Space and Society, 23, 44–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crang, M., & Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (2010). Nation, race, and affect: Senses and sensibilities at national heritage sites. Environment and Planning A, 42, 2315–2331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, D. (2015). Affect, heritage, feeling. In E. Waterton & S. Watson (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research (pp. xx). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Drozdzewski, D., De Nardi, S., & Waterton, E. (2016). Geographies of memory, place and identity: Intersections in remembering war and conflict. Geography Compass, 10/11, 447–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. (2012). Illuminated atmospheres: Anticipating and reproducing the flow of affective experience in Blackpool. Environment and Planning D, 30, 1103–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, G. (2012). Others: A prologue. In E. Giaccardi (Ed.), Heritage and social media: Understanding heritage in a participatory culture (pp. xiv–xvii). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L., Nienass, B., & Daniell, R. eds. (2016). Memory i materiality i sensuality. Special Issue Of Memory Studies, 9, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, L., Horst, H., Galloway, A., & Bell, G. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge companion to digital ethnography. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, H. (2016). Mobile intimacies: Everyday design and the aesthetics of mobile phones. In S. Pink, E. Ardèvol, & D. Lanzeni (Eds.), Digital materialities: Design and anthropology. Bloomsbury: London.159–174.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins, G. (2007). Materialising memory at Angel Island immigration station, San Francisco. Environment and Planning A, 39, 437–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntsman, A. (2012). Introduction: Affective fabrics of digital cultures. In A. Karatzogianni & A. Kuntsman (Eds.), Digital cultures and the politics of emotion feelings, affect and technological change (pp. 1–17). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T., Martin, F., & Sun, W. (2016). Telemodernities: Television and transforming lives in Asia. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muzaini, H. (2015). On the matter of forgetting and ‘memory returns’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40, 102–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2015). Doing sensory ethnography, (2nd ed). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Ardèvol, E. & Lanzeni, D. (Eds.), (2016) Digital materialities: design and anthropology. Bloomsbury: London.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., & Sumartojo, S. (2018). The lit world: Living with everyday urban automation. Social and Cultural Geography, 19, 833–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2016). Rethinking the geographies of cultural ‘objects’ throughdigital technologies: Interface, network and friction. Progress in Human Geography, 40, 334–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sather-Wagstaff, J. (2017). Making polysense of the world: Affect, memory, heritage. In D. P. Tolia-Kelly, E. Waterton, & S. Watson (Eds.), Heritage, affect and emotion: Politics, practices and infrastructures (pp. 12–30). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. C. (2013). Designing heritage for digital culture. In W. Gunn, T. Otto, & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Design anthropology: Theory and practice. Bloomsbury: London.117–138
   Google Scholar
• Sturken, M. (2016). The objects that lived: The 9/11 Museum and material transformation. Memory Studies, 9, 13–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumartojo, S. (2015). On atmosphere and darkness at Australia’s Anzac Day Dawn Service. Visual Communication, 14, 267–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumartojo, S. (2016). Commemorative atmospheres: Memorial sites, collective events and the experience of national identity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41, 541–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumartojo, S. (2019). Sensory impact: Memory, affect and photo-elicitation at official memory sites. In D. Drozdzewski & C. Birdsall (Eds.), Doing memory research: New methods and approaches (pp. 21–37). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Sumartojo, S., & Graves, M. (2018). Rust and dust: Materiality and the feel of memory at Camp des Milles. Journal of Material Culture. doi:10.1177/1359183518769110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolia-Kelly, D. P., Waterton, E., & Watson, S. (2017). Introduction: Heritage, affect and emotion. In D. P. Tolia-Kelly, E. Waterton, & S. Watson (Eds.), Heritage, affect and emotion: Politics, practices and infrastructures (pp. 1–11). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J., & Peters, K. (2015). Unlocking carceral atmospheres: Designing visual/material encounters at the prison museum. Visual Communication, 14, 309–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterton, E. (2014). A more-than-representational understanding of Heritage? The “past” and the politics of affect. Geography Compass, 8, 823–833.
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, E., & Dittmer, J. (2014). The museum as assemblage: Bringing forth affect at the Australian War Memorial. Museum Management and Curatorship, 29, 122–139.
   Google Scholar
• Witcomb, A. (2007). The materiality of virtual technologies: A new approach to thinking about the impact of multimedia in museums. In F. Cameron & S. Kenderdine (Eds.), Theorizing digital cultural heritage: A critical discourse (pp. 35–48). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witcomb, A. (2013). Understanding the role of affect in producing a critical pedagogy for history museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 28, 255–271.
   Google Scholar