References

• Adam, B. (2000). The temporal gaze: The challenge for social theory in the context of GM food. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/000713100358462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALRC. (2014). Equality, capacity and disability in commonwealth laws: Final report. Australian Law Reform Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., Finlay, W. M. L., & Walton, C. (2009). Choices for people with intellectual disabilities: Official discourse and everyday practice. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 6(4), 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2009.00230.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2012). 4433.0.55.003- Intellectual disability, Australia, 2012. [online document]. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/Lookup/4433.0.55.003Main+Features12012?OpenDocument
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C. (2016). Commentary by Christine Bigby on “Reducing the inequality of luck: Keynote address at the 2015 Australasian Society for intellectual disability national conference” (Bonyhady, 2016). Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(2), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2016.1230835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Douglas, J., Carney, T., Then, S. N., Wiesel, I., & Smith, E. (2017). Delivering decision-making support to people with cognitive disability—What has been learned from pilot programs in Australia from 2010 to 2015. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 52(3), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, S. (2012). Recognising the time–space dimensions of care: Caringscapes and carescapes. Environment and Planning A, 44(9), 2101–2118. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, T. (2012). Guardianship,“social” citizenship and theorising substitute decision-making law. In Beyond elder law (pp. 1–17). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, T., Tait, D., Wakefield, A., Ingvarson, M., & Touyz, S. (2005). Coercion in the treatment of anorexia nervosa: Clinical, ethical and legal implications. Medicine & Law, 24, 21–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carney, T., Then, S. N., Bigby, C., Wiesel, I., Douglas, J., & Smith, E. (2019). Realising ‘will, preferences and rights’: Reconciling differences on best practice support for decision-making? Griffith Law Review (Pre-print), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouinard, V. (2018). Living on the global peripheries of law: Disability human rights law in principle and in practice in the global south. Laws, 7(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws7010008
   Google Scholar
• Cuskelly, M., & Bryde, R. (2004). Attitudes towards the sexuality of adults with an intellectual disability: Parents, support staff, and a community sample. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 29(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250412331285136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, C., & West, R. (2017). NDIS self-management approaches: Opportunities for choice and control or an Uber-style wild west? Australian Journal of Social Issues, 52(4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., & Bigby, C. (2020). Development of an evidence-based practice framework to guide decision making support for people with cognitive impairment due to acquired brain injury or intellectual disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(3), 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1498546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., Drummond, M., Knox, L., & Mealings, M. (2015). Rethinking social-relational perspectives in rehabilitation: Traumatic brain injury as a case study. In K. McPherson, B. E. Gibson, & A. Leplege (Eds.), Rethinking rehabilitation theory (pp. 137–162). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. M. (2013). Conceptualizing self and maintaining social connection following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 27(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2012.722254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, E., & Arstein-Kerslake, A. (2014). Legislating personhood: Realising the right to support in exercising legal capacity. International Journal of Law in Context, 10(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552313000384
   Google Scholar
• Galderisi, S. (2019). The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: Great opportunities and dangerous interpretations. World Psychiatry, 18(1), 47–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gooding, P. (2013). Supported decision-making: A rights-based disability concept and its implications for mental health law. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20(3), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2012.711683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. M. (2000). The emergence of assisted (supported) decision-making in the Canadian law of adult guardianship and substitute decision-making. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 23(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2527(99)00034-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (2005). The entangled geographies of social exclusion/inclusion for people with learning disabilities. Health & Place, 11(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollomotz, A., & Roulstone, A. (2014). Institutionalised lives and exclusion from spaces of intimacy for people with learning difficulties. In K. Soldatic, H. Morgan, & A. Roulstone (Eds.), Disability, spaces and places of policy exclusion (pp. 147–162). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, L. (2007). Children’s sociospatial (re) production of disability within primary school playgrounds. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(5), 783–802. https://doi.org/10.1068/d73j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, L., Jeffries, J., Hall, E., & Power, A. (2019). Geographies of co‐production: Learning from inclusive research approaches at the margins. Area, 51(3), 390–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, L., Douglas, J., & Bigby, C. (2017). “I’ve never been a yes person”: Decision-making participation and self-conceptualisation after severe traumatic brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(22), 2250–2260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1219925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, N. A., Blumenthal, J. A., & Campbell, A. T. (2013). Supported decision-making: A viable alternative to guardianship? Penn State Law Review, 117(4), 1111–1157.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson, H., Fox, A., Street, S., Cull, J., Jenner, T., Lake, D., Lake, M., & Hart, S. (2016). Listening space: Lessons from artists with and without learning disabilities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(2), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775815613093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey, R., & Ryan, D. (2001). Experiences of staff in dealing with client sexuality in services for teenagers and adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45(1), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2001.00285.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, C., & Wiles, J. (2010). Landscapes of care. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 736–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510364556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn, N. D. (1992). The cultural anthropology of time: A critical essay. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21(1), 93–123. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.000521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, V. (2019). Co‐producing knowledge: Reflections on research on the residential geographies of learning disability. Area, 51(3), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, A., & Bartlett, R. (2018). Self-building safe havens in a post-service landscape: How adults with learning disabilities are reclaiming the welcoming communities agenda. Social & Cultural Geography, 19(3), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2015.1031686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, A., Bartlett, R., & Hall, E. (2016). Peer advocacy in a personalized landscape: The role of peer support in a context of individualized support and austerity. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 20(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629516634561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T., & Kwan, M. P. (2012). Critical space–time geographies. Environment and Planning A, 44(9), 2043–2048. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Lassmann, H., & Forber-Pratt, A. J. (2017). Supported decision-making: A synthesis of the literature across intellectual disability, mental health, and aging. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(2), 144–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szmukler, G. (2019). “Capacity”, “best interests”, “will and preferences” and the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. World Psychiatry, 18(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Then, S. N. (2013). Evolution and innovation in guardianship laws: Assisted decision-making. Sydney Law Review, 35(1), 133–166.
   Google Scholar
• Then, S. N., Carney, T., Bigby, C., & Douglas, J. (2018). Supporting decision-making of adults with cognitive disabilities: The role of law reform agencies–recommendations, rationales and influence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 61, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tideman, M. (2016, November 18). Swedish “God Man”: An unique supported decision making system–but does it work? [Paper Presentation], The Living With Disability Research Center Roundtable: supporting people with cognitive disabilities with decision making, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. (2001). An ethic of care. In M. B. Holstein & P. B. Mitzen (Eds.), Ethics in community-based elder care (pp. 60–68). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wareham, P., McCallin, A., & Diesfeld, K. (2005). Advance directives: The New Zealand context. Nursing Ethics, 12(4), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1191/0969733005ne800oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel, I., & Bigby, C. (2015). Movement on shifting sands: Deinstitutionalisation and people with intellectual disability in Australia, 1974–2014. Urban Policy and Research, 33(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2014.980902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel, I., & Bigby, C. (2016). Mainstream, inclusionary, and convivial places: Locating encounters between people with and without intellectual disabilities. Geographical Review, 106(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2015.12153.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel, I., Whitzman, C., Gleeson, B., & Bigby, C. (2019). The national disability insurance scheme in an urban context: Opportunities and challenges for Australian cities. Urban Policy and Research, 37(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2018.1481026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilton, R., Schormans, F. A., & Marquis, N. (2018). Shopping, social inclusion and the urban geographies of people with intellectual disability. Social & Cultural Geography, 19(2), 230–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1274773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar