References

• Adams-Hutcheson, G., & Longhurst, R. (2017). ‘At least in person there would have been a cup of tea’: Interviewing via Skype. Area, 49(2), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2013). The cultural politics of emotion. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, I., & Niedomysl, T. (2010). Clamour for glamour? city competition for hosting the swedish tryouts to the eurovision song contest. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 101(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00520.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, A. L., & Nash, C. J. (2006). Undressing the researcher: Feminism, embodiment and sexuality at a queer bathhouse event. Area, 38(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00663.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. (2021, May 26). If you don’t get it, if you, if you don’t get it: Eurovision 2021 and the struggle for racial justice (part 2). Catherine Baker. Retrieved June 30, 2021, from https://bakercatherine.wordpress.com/2021/05/26/if-you-dont-get-it-if-you-if-you-dont-get-it-eurovision-2021-and-the-struggle-for-racial-justice-part-2/
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. (2017). The ‘gay Olympics’? The Eurovision Song Contest and the politics of LGBT/European belonging. European Journal of International Relations, 23(1), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066116633278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. (2020). ‘I am the voice of the past that will always be’: The Eurovision Song Contest as historical fiction. Journal of Historical Fictions, 2(2), 102–125.
   Google Scholar
• Bohlman, F. (2007). The politics of power, pleasure and prayer in the Eurovision Song Contest. Muzikologija, January(7), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.2298/MUZ0707039B
   Google Scholar
• Bonner-Thompson, C. (2017). ‘The meat market’: Production and regulation of masculinities on the Grindr grid in Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(11), 1611–1625. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1356270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Browne, K., Brown, M., Roelvink, G., Carnegie, M., & Anderson, B. (2011). Sedgwick’s geographies: Touching space. Progress in Human Geography, 35(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510386253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. (2006). Cosmopolitan camouflage:(post-) gay space in Spitalfields. In J. Binnie, J. Holloway, S. Millington, & C. Young (Eds.), Cosmopolitan Urbanism (pp. 130–145). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. P. (2005). Closet space: Geographies of metaphor from the body to the globe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, K., & Bakshi, L. (2011). We are here to party? Lesbian, gay, bisexual and, trans leisurescapes beyond commercial gay scenes. Leisure Studies, 30(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2010.506651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, A., Schafran, A., & Carpenter, G. (2018). What does it mean when people call a place a shithole? Understanding a discourse of denigration in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 43(3), 496–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-P. (2016). Playing with digital gender identity and cultural value. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2015.1013455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleto, F. (1999). Camp: Queer aesthetics and the performing subject: A reader. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cockayne, D. G., & Richardson, L. (2017). Queering code/space: The co-production of socio-sexual codes and digital technologies. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(11), 1642–1658. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockayne, D., Leszczynski, A., & Zook, M. (2017). # HotForBots: Sex, the non-human and digitally mediated spaces of intimate encounter. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space, 35(6), 1115–1133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817709018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupples, J. (2002). The Field as a Landscape of Desire: Sex and Sexuality in Geographical Fieldwork. Area, 34(4), 382–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4762.00095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Craene, V. (2017). Fucking geographers! Or the epistemological consequences of neglecting the lusty researcher’s body. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(3), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1314944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EBU. (2021, May 31). 183 million viewers welcome back Eurovision Song Contest as online engagement soars. Retrieved 8 July 2021, from https://www.ebu.ch/news/2021/05/183-million-viewers-welcome-back-eurovision-song-contest-as-over-half-of-young-audiences-tune-in
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, K. (2015). Eurovision song contest: More than music? In ÖRF (Ed.) , Eurovision and the ‘new’ Europe (pp. 8–15). Vienna: ÖRF: Public Value .
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, K., Moreo, E., & Singleton, B. (2007). Part of the show: The global networking of Irish Eurovision Song Contest fans. In K. Fricker & R. Lentin (Eds.), Performing global networks (pp. 139–162). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, K. (2013). ‘It’s just not funny any more’: Terry Wogan, Melancholy Britain, and the Eurovision Song Contest. In K. Fricker & M. Gluhovic (Eds.), Performing the ‘New’ Europe: Identities, Feelings, and Politics in the Eurovision Song Contest (pp. 53–76). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137367983_3
   Google Scholar
• Fuss, D. (Ed.). (1991). Inside/out: Lesbian theories, gay theories. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geoghegan, C. (2016, April 22). Preparing For Eurovision with song contest superfans in London. Vice. Retrieved December 4, 2019, from, https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/pp4xzg/eurovision-song-contest-europe-party-event-gay
   Google Scholar
• Ghaziani, A. (2015). ‘Gay Enclaves Face Prospect of Being PassÉ’: How Assimilation Affects the Spatial Expressions of Sexuality in the United States. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 756–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieseking, J. J. (2017). Messing with the attractiveness algorithm: A response to queering code/space. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(11), 1659–1665. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1379955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman-Murray, A. (2013). Straight–gay friendships: Relational masculinities and equalities landscapes in Sydney, Australia. Geoforum, 49(October), 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.09.014
   Google Scholar
• Halliwell, J., & Wilkinson, S. (2021). Mobile phones, text messaging and social media. In N. Von Benzon, M. Holton, C. Wilkinson, & S. Wilkinson (Eds.), Creative methods for human geographers (pp. 259–272). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. D. (2014). A New Song for a New Motherland: Eurovision and the Rhetoric of Post-Soviet National Identity. The Russian Review, 73(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/russ.10718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemish, D. (2007). Gay brotherhood: Israeli gay men and the Eurovision Song Contest. In I. Raykoff & R. D. Tobin (Eds.), A song for Europe: Popular music and politics in the Eurovision song contest (pp. 123–134). Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leyshon, M., DiGiovanna, S., & Holcomb, B. (2013). Mobile technologies and youthful exploration: Stimulus or inhibitor? Urban Studies, 50(3), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012468897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnekin, J. (1998). Fieldwork and families: Constructing new models for ethnographic research. In L. Marshall & J. Armstrong (Eds.), Family and other uncontrollables: Impression management in accompanied fieldwork (pp. 71–83). University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maliepaard, E. (2017). Bisexual safe space (s) on the internet: Analysis of an online forum for bisexuals. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 108(3), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maliepaard, E. (2020). Spaces with a bisexual appearance: Re-conceptualizing bisexual space(s) through a study of bisexual practices in the Netherlands. Social & Cultural Geography 21(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2018.1454979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F. (2000). From citizenship to queer counterpublic: Reading Taipei’s New Park. Communal/Plural: Journal of Transnational & Cross-Cultural Studies, 8(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13207870050001475
   Google Scholar
• Messner, M. A. (1993). “Changing men” and feminist politics in the United States. Theory and Society, 22(5), 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miazhevich, G. (2012). Ukrainian Nation Branding Off-line and Online: Verka Serduchka at the Eurovision Song Contest. Europe-Asia Studies, 64(8), 1505–1523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2012.712274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, S. (2018). Still getting it on online: Thirty years of queer male spaces brokered through digital technologies. Geography Compass, 12(11), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrovic, M. (2009). Colours of the new face of Serbia: National symbols and popular music. Glasnik Etnografskog Instituta, 57(2), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI0902007M
   Google Scholar
• Munt, S. R. (2007). Queer Attachments: The Cultural Politics of Shame. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315245478
   Google Scholar
• Nash, C. J. (2013). The age of the “post-mo”? Toronto’s gay Village and a new generation. Geoforum, 49(October), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.11.023
   Google Scholar
• O’Riordan, K. (2007). Queer theories and cybersubjects: Intersecting figures. In K. O’Riordan & D. J. Phillips (Eds.), Queer online: Media technology and sexuality (pp. 13–30). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Oswin, N. (2010). The modern model family at home in Singapore: A queer geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(2), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00379.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probyn, E. (2000). Sporting Bodies: Dynamics of Shame and Pride. Body & Society, 6(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X00006001002
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. K. (2006). Mapping US Homonormativities. Gender, Place & Culture, 13(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690500531014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehberg, P. (2007). Winning failure. Queer nationality at the Eurovision song contest. SQS: Journal of Queer Studies in Finland, 2, 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Sandover, R., Kinsley, S., & Hinchliffe, S. (2018). A very public cull – The anatomy of an online issue public. Geoforum, 97(December), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.016
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, E. K., & Frank, A. (1995). Shame and its sisters: A Silvan Tomkins reader. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, E. K. (1990). Epistemology of the closet. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sieg, K. (2013). Cosmopolitan empire: Central and Eastern Europeans at the Eurovision Song Contest. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 244–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549412450639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. (1994). Television And Everyday Life. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, B., Fricker, K., & Moreo, E. (2007). Performing the queer network. Fans and families at the Eurovision Song Contest. SQS–Suomen Queer-Tutkimuksen Seuran Lehti, 2, 12–24.
   Google Scholar
• Tabberer, J. (2021, June 29). Eurovision winners Måneskin kiss on stage in Poland in protest of homophobia. Attitude. Retrieved July 7, 2021, from, http://attitude.co.uk/article/eurovision-winners-maneskin-kiss-on-stage-in-Poland-in-protest-of-homophobia/25269/
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Y., Falconer, E., & Snowdon, R. (2014). Queer youth, Facebook and faith: Facebook methodologies and online identities. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1138–1153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814544000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong, J. (2018a). Attending to others: How digital technologies direct young people’s nightlife. Geographica Helvetica, 73(2), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-193-2018
   Google Scholar
• Truong, J. (2018b). Collapsing contexts: Social networking technologies in young people’s nightlife. Children’s Geographies, 16(3), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1458214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderbeck, R. M. (2005). Masculinities and Fieldwork: Widening the discussion. Gender, Place & Culture, 12(4), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690500356537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waitt, G., & Gorman-Murray, A. (2008). Camp in the Country: Re-negotiating Sexuality and Gender Through a Rural Lesbian and Gay Festival. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 6(3), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766820802647616
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S. (2019, November 27). Hungary pulls out of Eurovision amid rise in anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/nov/27/Hungary-pulls-out-of-eurovision-amid-rise-in-anti-lgbt-rhetoric
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. (2002). Publics and Counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-14-1-49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, J. J., & Young, D. (2011). Queer Bonds. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 17(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-1163382
   Google Scholar
• Wellings, B., Jay, Z., & Strong, C. (2019). ‘Making Your Mind Up’: Britain, Europe and Eurovision Scepticism. In J. Kalman, B. Wellings, & K. Jacotine (Eds.), Eurovisions: Identity and the International Politics of the Eurovision Song Contest since 1956 (pp. 47–72). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9427-0
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, C. (2016). ‘Babe, I like your lipstick’: Rethinking researcher personality and appearance. Children’s Geographies, 14(1), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2015.1039370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebracki, M., & Luger, J. (2019). Digital geographies of public art: New global politics. Progress in Human Geography, 43(5), 890–909. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518791734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar