Rethinking gamified democracy as frictional: a comparative examination of the Decide Madrid and vTaiwan platforms

References

• Anderson, B. (2017). Cultural geography 1 : Intensities and forms of power. Progress in Human Geography, 41(4), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516649491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J. (2009). Emerging spatialities of the screen : Video games and the reconfiguration of spatial awareness. Environment & Planning A, 41(9), 2105–2125. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J. (2015). Technology and affect : Towards a theory of inorganically organised objects. Emotion, Space and Society, 14 , 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2013.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J., Anderson, B., Gordon, R., & Langley, P. (2018). Digital interface design and power: Friction, threshold, transition. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space, 36(6), 1136–1153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818767426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J., Kitchin, R., & Leszczynski, A. (2018). Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516664800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, C. (2003). Culture and democracy: Media, space and representation. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, C. (2004). Media, democracy and representation: Disembodying the public. In C. Barnett & M. Low (Eds.), Spaces of democracy : Geographical perspectives on citizenship, participation and representation. SAGE. 185–206 .
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, C. (2018). Playing work, or gamification as stultification. Information, Communication & Society, 21(9), 1193–1203. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1450435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, J., Bermudez, S., Pilet, J. B., & Soubiran, T. (2020). Power users in online democracy: Their origins and impact. Information Communication and Society, 23(13), 1838–1853. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1621920
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2009). Web 2.0 : New challenges for the study of E-Democracy in an Era of informational exuberance. Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5(1), 9–41. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9006.003.0005
   Google Scholar
• Cook, I. (2005). Participant observation. In R. Flowerdew & D. Martin (Eds.), Methods in geography: A guide for students doing a research project (2nd ed., pp. 167–188). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2010). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space, 28(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1068/d11407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2012). Mobilities II: Still. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511423349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2014). Mobilities III: Moving on. Progress in Human Geography, 38(5), 712–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514530316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decide Madrid. (n.d.). DecideMadrid. from https://decide.madrid.es/presupuestos-participativos-resultados
   Google Scholar
• Deterding, S., O’Hara, K., Sicart, M., Dixon, D., & Nacke, L. (2011). Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming contexts. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery. January, 2425–2428. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979575
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2019). Inside Taiwan’s new digital democracy. The Economist. from https://www.economist.com/open-future/2019/03/12/inside-taiwans-new-digital-democracy
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. (2020). Digital games, developing democracies, and civic engagement: A study of games in Kenya and Nigeria. Media, Culture and Society, 42(7–8), 1309–1325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720914030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fominaya, C. F. (2009). Autonomous Movements and the Institutional Left : Two Approaches in Tension in Madrid ’ s Anti-globalization Network. South European Society & Politics, 12(3), 335–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608740701495202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., & Richards, R. C. (2017). Embracing digital democracy. PS, Political Science & Politics, 50(3), 758–763. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517000555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, K. L., & Van Dijk, J. (2000). What is digital democracy ? In K. L. Hacker & J. Van Dijk (Eds.), Digital democracy (pp. 1–9). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hague, B., & Loader, B. (1999). Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, L. (2017). Governments should play games: Towards a framework for the gamification of civic engagement platforms. Simulation & Gaming, 48(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878116683581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, L., & Valentine, G. (2014). Emotion and politics in a mediated public sphere : Questioning democracy, responsibility and ethics in a computer mediated world. Geoforum, 52 (0) , 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.01.008
   Google Scholar
• Juris, J. (2012). Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Anthropological Association, 39(2), 259–279.
   Google Scholar
• Karpp, P. (2011). Noise channels : Glitch and error in digital culture. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsley, S. (2014). The matter of “virtual” geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 364–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513506270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Journal Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. (2014). Making democracy fun: How game design can empower citizens and transform politics. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. (2019). Glitchy vignettes of platform urbanism. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space, 38(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819878721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, B. D. (1997). The governance of cyberspace. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loader, B. D., & Mercea, D. (2011). Introduction networking democracy? Social media innovations and participatory politics. Information Communication and Society, 14(6), 757–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.592648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, G. (2016). Decide Madrid’s legacy: source code and support for more and more eParticipation portals in Spain. European Commission. Epractice.Eu. Epractice.Eu. https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/egovernment/document/decide-madrids-legacy-source-code-and-support-more-and-more-eparticipation-portals-spain
   Google Scholar
• McGonical, J. (2011). Reality is Broken. The Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: Technology, solutionism, and the urge to fix problems that don’t exist. The penguin books.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, S. (2010). Creating citizens through play: The role of leisure in Indonesian nation-building. Social and Cultural Geography, 11(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360903414577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66(3), 745–758. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40971349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. https://doi.org/JA 71.M6. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• The New York Times. (2019). A strong democracy is a digital democracy. The New York Times. from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/15/opinion/taiwan-digital-democracy.html
   Google Scholar
• Pallett, H. (2015). Public participation organizations and open policy: A constitutional moment for British democracy? Science Communication, 37(6), 769–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015612787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perng, S.-Y., & Kitchin, R. (2016). Solutions and frictions in civic hacking: Collaboratively designing and building wait time predictions for an immigration office. Social & Cultural Geography, 19(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1247193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbiosi, C. (2019). The frictional geography of cultural heritage. Grounding the Faro Convention into urban experience in Forlì, Italy. Social and Cultural Geography 23 1 , 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2019.1698760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranciere, J. (1998). Dis-agreement: Politics and Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J., Panagia, D., & Bowlby, R. (2001). Ten theses on politics. Theory & Event, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2001.0028
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2016). Rethinking the geographies of cultural ‘objects’ through digital technologies: Interface, network and friction. Progress in Human Geography, 40(3), 334–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515580493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saulière, S., Escudero, D., & Rebeca Abellán, A. (2018). Digital analysis of Decide Madrid: Users, themes and strategies proposals, for the strengthening of communities. Media Lab Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. G. R., & Sharp, J. P. (2013). Playing with the future: Social irrealism and the politics of aesthetics. Social and Cultural Geography, 14(3), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2013.765027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J., Bass, T., Boelman, V., & Mulgan, G. (2017). Digital Democracy: The tools transforming political engagement. Nesta. https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/digital-democracy-the-tools-transforming-political-engagement/
   Google Scholar
• Thiel, S. K., Reisinger, M., Röderer, K., & Fröhlich, P. (2016). Playing (With) democracy: A review of gamified participation approaches. EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 8(3), 32–60. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v8i3.440
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, Y. (2021). Navigating the Field. In M. O. Ajebon, C. Y. M. Kwong, & D. A. de Ita (Eds.), Navigating the Field (pp. 91–100). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68113-5
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, Y. (forthcoming). Assemblage thinking as a methodology for studying Urban AI phenomena. AI & SOCIETY. Springer.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. (2005). Friction. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The United Nation. (2018). 2018 UNPSA Winners. from https://publicadministration.un.org/unpsa/database/Winners/2018-winners
   Google Scholar
• Vanolo, A. (2018). Cities and the politics of gamification. Cities, 74(2018), 320–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.021
   Google Scholar
• Waitt, G. (2005). The Sydney 2002 Gay Games and querying Australian national space. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space, 23(3), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1068/d401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, O. (2020). The digital subversion of urban space: Power, performance and grime. Social and Cultural Geography, 21(3), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2018.1491617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2011). Politics as usual ? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation. New Media & Society, 14(2), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. (2012). Assessing (e-) Democratic Innovations : “ Democratic Goods ” and Downing Street E-Petitions. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(4), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2012.712820
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S., & Street, J. (2007). Democracy, deliberation and design: The case of online discussion forums. New Media and Society, 9(5), 849–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807081230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar