2,094
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Missed connections? Everyday mobility experiences and the sociability of public transport in Amsterdam during COVID-19

¿Conexiones perdidas? Experiencias cotidianas de movilidad y la sociabilidad del transporte público en Ámsterdam durante el COVID-19

Correspondances ratées ? Les expériences quotidiennes de mobilité et la sociabilité des transports en commun à Amsterdam pendant la pandémie de COVID-19

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 1693-1712 | Received 01 Oct 2021, Accepted 14 Apr 2022, Published online: 01 Jun 2022

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). Affective Economies. Social Text, 22(2), 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117
  • Aloi, A., Alonso, B., Benavente, J., Cordera, R., Echániz, E., González, F., Ladisa, C., Lezama-Romanelli, R., López-Parra, Á., Mazzei, V., Perrucci, L., Prieto-Quintana, D., Rodríguez, A., & Sañudo, R. (2020). Effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on urban mobility: Empirical evidence from the city of Santander (Spain). Sustainability, 12(9), 3870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093870
  • Anderson, B. (2009). Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society, 2(2), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005
  • Aoustin, L., & Levinson, D. M. (2021). Longing to travel: Commute appreciation during COVID-19. Findings, January , 18523. https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.18523
  • Augé, M. (2002). In the metro. (T. Conley, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
  • Berkovich, A., Lu, A., Levine, B., & Reddy, A. V. (2013). Observed customer seating and standing behavior and seat preferences on board subway cars in New York City. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2353(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.3141/2353-04
  • Bille, M., & Simonsen, K. (2021). Atmospheric practices: On affecting and being affected. Space and Culture, 24(2), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331218819711
  • Bissell, D. (2007). Animating suspension: Waiting for mobilities. Mobilities, 2(2), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100701381581
  • Bissell, D. (2010). Passenger mobilities: Affective atmospheres and the sociality of public transport. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(2), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1068/d3909
  • Bissell, D. (2016). Micropolitics of mobility: Public transport commuting and everyday encounters with forces of enablement and constraint. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(2), 394–403. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315266336-17
  • Borkowski, P., Jażdżewska-Gutta, M., & Szmelter-Jarosz, A. (2021). Lockdowned: Everyday mobility changes in response to COVID-19. Journal of Transport Geography, 90(January), 102906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102906
  • Butcher, M. (2011). Cultures of commuting: The mobile negotiation of space and subjectivity on Delhi’s Metro. Mobilities, 6(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2011.552902
  • Cats, O., Reimal, T., & Susilo, Y. (2014). Public transport pricing policy: Empirical evidence from a fare-free scheme in Tallinn, Estonia. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2415(2415), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.3141/2415-10
  • Conradson, D., & Mckay, D. (2007). Translocal subjectivities: mobility, connection, emotion. Mobilities, 2(2), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100701381524
  • Craddock, S. (2000). City of Plagues: Disease, poverty, and deviance in San Francisco. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern Western world. Routledge.
  • Cresswell, T. (2010). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1068/d11407
  • Darling, J., & Wilson, H. F. (2016). Encountering the city: Urban encounters from accra to New York. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.nl/books?id=Ao-uDAAAQBAJ
  • De Haas, M., Faber, R., & Hamersma, M. (2020). How COVID-19 and the Dutch ‘intelligent lockdown’ change activities, work and travel behaviour: Evidence from longitudinal data in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 6(July), 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100150
  • Epley, N., & Schroeder, J. (2014). Mistakenly seeking solitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 1980–1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037323
  • Fincham, B., McGuinness, M., & Murray, L. (Eds.). (2010). Mobile methodologies. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Fleetwood, N. (2004). “Busing it” in the city: Black youth, performance, and public transit. TDR/The Drama Review, 48(2), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1162/105420404323063382
  • Goffman, E. (1966). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings (1st ed.). The Free Press.
  • Honkatukia, P., & Svynarenko, A. (2019). Intergenerational encounters on the metro: Young people’s perspectives on social control in the media city. Emotion, Space and Society, 32(August), 100545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2018.10.001
  • James, A. C. (2020). Don’t stand so close to me: Public spaces, behavioral geography, and COVID-19. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(2), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820620935672
  • Jensen, O. B. (2006). “Facework”, flow and the city: Simmel, Goffman, and mobility in the contemporary city. Mobilities, 1(2), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100600726506
  • Jensen, O. B. (2009). Flows of meaning, cultures of movements – Urban mobility as meaningful everyday life practice. Mobilities, 4(1), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100802658002
  • Koefoed, L., Christensen, M. D., & Simonsen, K. (2017). Mobile encounters: Bus 5A as a cross-cultural meeting place. Mobilities, 12(5), 726–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1181487
  • Löfgren, O. (2008). Motion and emotion: Learning to be a railway traveller. Mobilities, 3(3), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100802376696
  • McCormack, D. P. (2008). Engineering affective atmospheres on the moving geographies of the 1897 Andrée expedition. Cultural Geographies, 15(4), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474008094314
  • Nikolaeva, A., Lin, Y.-T., Lin, Y. T., Nello-Deakin, S., & Rubin, O. (2021). What does it mean to be less mobile? Insights from COVID-19 lockdown. Centre for Urban Studies, WP(52), 30. https://urbanstudies.uva.nl/content/working-paper-series/working-paper-series-no.52.html.
  • Pinkster, F. M. (2020). Interviewing in urban research. In N. Verloo & L. Bertolini (Eds.), Seeing the city (pp. 70–84). Amsterdam University Press.
  • Purifoye, G. Y. (2015). Nice–Nastiness and other raced social interactions on public transport systems. City & Community, 14(3), 286–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12116
  • Rink, B. (2016). Race and the micropolitics of mobility. Transfers, 6(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.3167/TRANS.2016.060106
  • Rokem, J., & Vaughan, L. (2019). Geographies of ethnic segregation in Stockholm: The role of mobility and co-presence in shaping the ‘diverse’ city. Urban Studies, 56(12), 2426–2446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018795561
  • Rubin, O., Nikolaeva, A., Nello-Deakin, S., & te Brömmelstroet, M. (2020). What can we learn from the COVID-19 pandemic about how people experience working from home and commuting? Centre for Urban Studies, University of Amsterdam. https://urbanstudies.uva.nl/content/blog-series/covid-19-pandemic-working-from-home-and-commuting.html
  • Russell, M., Price, R., Signal, L., Stanley, J., Gerring, Z., & Cumming, J. (2011). What do passengers do during travel time? Structured observations on buses and trains. Journal of Public Transportation, 14(3), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.14.3.7
  • Sandstrom, G. M., & Dunn, E. W. (2014). Is efficiency overrated?: Minimal social interactions lead to belonging and positive affect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613502990
  • Sengupta, S., Abdul, G., Andreoni, M., & Penney, V. (2021, March 25). Riders are abandoning buses and trains. That’s a problem for climate change. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/25/climate/buses-trains-ridership-climate-change.html
  • Shaker, R. (2021). “Saying nothing is saying something”: Affective Encounters with the muslim other in amsterdam public transport. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 7(111) , 2130–2148. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1866488
  • Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268
  • Te Brömmelstroet, M., Nikolaeva, A., Glaser, M., Nicolaisen, M. S., & Chan, C. (2017). Travelling together alone and alone together: Mobility and potential exposure to diversity. Applied Mobilities, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2017.1283122
  • Te Brömmelstroet, M., Nikolaeva, A., Cadima, C., Verlinghieri, E., Ferreira, A., Mladenović, M., Milakis, D., De Abreu, E., Silva, J., & Papa, E. (2021). Have a good trip! Expanding our concepts of the quality of everyday travelling with flow theory. Applied Mobilities, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2021.1912947
  • Thomas, F. M. F., Charlton, S. G., Lewis, I., & Nandavar, S. (2021). Commuting before and after COVID-19. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 11(September), 100423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100423
  • Thrift, N. J. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect (1st ed.). Routledge.
  • Tonnelat, S., & Kornblum, W. (2017). International express: New Yorkers on the 7 train. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/tonn18148
  • Tuvikene, T., Kębłowski, W., Weicker, T., Finch, J., Sgibnev, W., Sträuli, L., Laine, S., Dobruszkes, F., & Ianchenko, A. (2021). Public transport as public space in European cities. Leipzig: Leibniz-Institut für Länderkunde e.V. (IfL) . https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/72914/ssoar-2021-tuvikene_et_al-Public_transport_as_public_space.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-2021-tuvikene_et_al-Public_transport_as_public_space.pdf
  • Untokening. (2020). Mobility Justice and COVID-19 [Web publication]. Untokening Collective.
  • Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Polity Press.
  • Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133308089372
  • Valentine, G., & Sadgrove, J. (2014). Biographical narratives of encounter: The significance of mobility and emplacement in shaping attitudes towards difference. Urban Studies, 51(9), 1979–1994. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013504142
  • Welch, R. V., & Panelli, R. (2007). Questioning community as a collective antidote to fear: Jean-Luc Nancy’s ‘singularity’ and ‘being singular plural. Area, 39(3), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00755.x
  • Wilson, H. F. (2011). Passing propinquities in the multicultural city: The everyday encounters of bus passengering. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(3), 634–649. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43354