Towards a research agenda for animal and disability geographies: ableism, speciesism, care, space, and place

References

• Adams, C. J. (1990). The sexual politics of meat. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, C. J. (2018). Discussion. In L. Gruen & F. Probyn-Rapsey (Eds.), Animaladies (pp. 231–246). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. (1997). A walk on the wild side: A critical geography of domestication. Progress in Human Geography, 21(4), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673999021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. (2000). “The beast within”: Race, humanity, and animality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1068/d229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Martínez, D. E. (2020). Geoforum Canicide by Cop: A geographical analysis of canine killings by police in Los Angeles. Geoforum, 111, 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolman, B. (2019). Parroting patriots: Interspecies trauma and becoming-well-together. Medical Humanities, 45(3), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2018-011630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonehill, J., von Benzon, N., & Shaw, J. (2020). ‘The shops were only made for people who could walk’: Impairment, barriers and autonomy in the mobility of adults with cerebral palsy in urban England. Mobilities, 15(3), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2020.1746057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, H. (2014). Animal geographies I. Progress in Human Geography, 38(2), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1068/d150411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R., & Bowlby, S. (1997). Bodies and spaces: An exploration of disabled people’s experiences of public space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15(4), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1068/d150411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R., & Parr, H. (1999). Mind and body spaces. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, J., Gorman, R., & Thieleman, K. (2020). Evaluating care farming as a means to care for those in trauma and grief. Health and Place, 62, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, N., & Wolkowitz, C. (2019). Bringing dogs onto campus: Inclusions and exclusions of animal bodies in organizations. Gender, Work and Organization, 26(3), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouinard, V., Hall, E., & Wilton, R. (2016). Towards enabling geographies: ‘Disabled’ bodies and minds in society and space. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collard, R. C., & Gillespie, K. (2015). Introduction. In K. Gillespie & R.-C. Collard (Eds.), Critical Animal Geographies (pp. 1–16). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–168. https://philpapers.org/archive/CREDTI.pdf?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000603
   Google Scholar
• Deckha, M. (2009). Intersectionality and posthumanist visions of equality. Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender, and Society, 23(2), 249–268. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/wiswo23&div=15&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals
   Google Scholar
• Donald, M. M. (2018). Entanglements with empathy A critical exploration of more-than-human ethics in a school of veterinary medicine. University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Eason, F. (2020). Human-Canine Collaboration in Care. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, C., & Maxwell, N. (2021). Disability, hostility and everyday geographies of un/safety. Social and Cultural Geography, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2021.1950823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, G., Wolch, J., & Emel, J. (1998). Race, Place, and the Bounds of Humanity. Society and Animals, 6(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853098X00140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emel, J. (1995). Are you man enough, big and bad enough? Ecofeminism and wolf eradication in the USA. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13(6), 707–734. https://doi.org/10.1068/d130707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emel, J., & Neo, H. (2015). Political ecologies of meat. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, A., & Schuurman, N. (2019). Aging animal bodies: Horse retirement yards as relational spaces of liminality, dwelling and negotiation. Social and Cultural Geography, 20(7), 918–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2017.1392592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, L. (2020). Animal geographies I: Hearing the cry and extending beyond. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 769–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519863483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, L. (2021). Animal geographies II: Killing and caring (in times of crisis). Progress in Human Geography, 45(2), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520942295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, K. (2014). Sexualized violence and the gendered commodification of the animal body in Pacific Northwest US dairy production. Gender, Place and Culture, 21(10), 1321–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2013.832665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, K., & Collard, R. C. (2015). Critical animal geographies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B. (1999). Geographies of Disability. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2013). Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disability and Society, 28(5), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.717884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2019). Provocations for Critical Disability Studies. Disability & Society, 34(6), 972–997. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, R. (2019). What’s in it for the animals? Symbiotically considering ‘therapeutic’ human-animal relations within spaces and practices of care farming. Medical Humanities, 45(3), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2018-011627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, E. (2014). An Interview with Sunaura Taylor. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 12(2), 9–16. https://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/JCAS-Vol-12-Issue-2-May-20145.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grue, J., & Lundblad, M. (2020). The biopolitics of disability and animality in harriet McBryde johnson. In N. Watson & S. Vehmas (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies (2nd) ed., pp. 117–126). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gruen, L., & Probyn-Rapsey, F. (2018). Animaladies. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, H. (1989). Disability and the reproduction of bodily images: The dynamics of human appearances. In J. Wolch & M. Dear (Eds.), The Power of Geography (pp. 370–388). Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (2018). A critical geography of disability hate crime. Area, 51(2), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E., & Bates, E. (2019). Hatescape? A relational geography of disability hate crime, exclusion and belonging in the city. Geoforum, 101, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2008). When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, J., de Bruin, S. R., Berget, B., & Elings, M. (2017). Exploring the role of farm animals in providing care at care farms. Animals, 7(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7060045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, P. (2018). Feminist geographies and intersectionality. Gender, Place and Culture, 25(4), 585–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1460331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovorka, A. J. (2012). Women/chickens vs. men/cattle: Insights on gender-species intersectionality. Geoforum, 43(4), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2014.993546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovorka, A. J. (2015). The gender, place and culture jan monk distinguished annual lecture: Feminism and animals: Exploring interspecies relations through intersectionality, performativity and standpoint. Gender, Place and Culture, 22(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516646291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovorka, A. J. (2017). Animal geographies I: Globalizing and decolonizing. Progress in Human Geography, 41(3), 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517699924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovorka, A. J. (2018). Animal geographies II: Hybridizing. Progress in Human Geography, 42(3), 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517699924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovorka, A. J. (2019). Animal geographies III: Species relations of power. Progress in Human Geography, 43(4), 749–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518775837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovorka, A. J., McCubbin, S., & Van Patter, L. (2021). A research agenda for animal geographies. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hovorka, A. J., Mccubbin, S., & Van Patter, L. (2021). Introduction to A research agenda for animal geographies: Visioning amidst socio-ecological crises. In A. J. Hovorka, S. McCubbin, & L. Van Patter (Eds.), A research agenda for animal geographies (pp. 1–20). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie, R. (1996). Disability and the City. Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie, R. (2001). Barriered and bounded places and the spatialities of disability. Urban Studies, 38(2), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980124639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie, R., & Edwards, C. (2007). The geographies of disability: Reflections on the development of a sub-discipline. Geography Compass, 1(3), 623–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00032.x
   Google Scholar
• Jampel, C. (2018). Intersections of disability justice, racial justice and environmental justice. Environmental Sociology, 4(1), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2018.1424497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S., Struthers Monford, K., & Taylor, C. (2020). Disability and animality: Crip perspectives in critical animal studies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. (2020). Zoos, Circuses, and freak shows: A cross-movement analysis. In S. Jenkins, K. Struthers Monford, & C. Taylor (Eds.), Disability and Animality: Crip Perspectives and Critical Animal Studies (pp. 57–74). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, C. (2008). Beyond the clearing: Towards a dwelt animal geography. Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 633–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508089825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, J., Nevins, J., & Schneiderman, J. (2015). Commodification, violence, and the making of workers and ducks at Hudson Valley Foie Gras. In K. Gillespie & R.-C. Collard (Eds.), Critical animal geographies (pp. 93–107). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist Queer Crip. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaley, A., Hatton, C., & Milligan, C. (2019). Therapeutic spaces of care farming: Transformative or ameliorating? Social Science and Medicine, 227, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, D. (2016). Dangerous dogs, dangerous owners and the waste management of an ‘Irredeemable species. Sociology, 50(3), 560–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038514568232
   Google Scholar
• McKee, T. V. S. (2015). The cost of a second chance: Life, death, and redemption among prison inmates and thoroughbred ex-racehorses in Bluegrass Kentucky. In P. J. Lopez & K. Gillespie (Eds.), Economies of Death (pp. 55–72). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McKeithen, W. (2017). Queer ecologies of home: Heteronormativity, speciesism, and the strange intimacies of crazy cat ladies. Gender, Place and Culture, 24(1), 122–134 https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2016.1276888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalko, R. (1999). The two-in-one: Walking with smokie, walking with blindness. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, C. (2007). Geographies of voluntarism: Mapping the terrain. Geography Compass, 1(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00008.x
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, H. (2018). Ableism, speciesism, animals, and autism: The devaluation of interspecies friendships. In L. Gruen & F. Probyn-Rapsey (Eds.), Animaladies (pp. 89–100). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Nast, H. J. (2006). Critical pet studies? Antipode, 38(5), 894–906. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2006.00484.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (2021). Vegan world-making in meat-centric society: The embodied geographies of veganism. Social and Cultural Geography, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2021.1975164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, D. C., Radford, J. P., & Vickers, M. H. (1998). Disability studies in human geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 208–233. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298672928786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, H., & Butler, R. (1999). New geographies of illness, impairment and disability. In R. Butler & H. Parr (Eds.), Mind and Body Space (pp. 1–24). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton, N. (2019). Cocreating guide dog partnerships: Dog training and interdependence in 1930s America. Medical Humanities, 45(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2018-011626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philo, C. (2004). A geographical history of institutional provision for the insane from medieval times to the 1860ʹs in England and wales. Edwin Mellen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philo, C. (2012). The ugly laws: A beautiful book. Social and Cultural Geography, 13(6), 659–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2012.713249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philo, C., & MacLachlan, I. (2018). The Strange Case of the Missing Slaughterhouse Geographies. In S. Wilcox & S. Rutherford (Eds.), Historical animal geographies. Routledge 86–106 .
   Google Scholar
• Philo, C., & Wilbert, C. (2000a). Animal spaces, beastly places. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Philo, C., & Wilbert, C. (2000b). Introduction. In C. Philo & C. Wilbert (Eds.), Animals spaces, beastly places (pp. 1–37). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Philo, C., & Wolch, J. (1996). Guest editors’ introduction: Through the geographical looking glass: Space, place, and society-animal relations. Society and Animals, 6(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2018-011630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, A. (2016). What is meat culture? In A. Potts (Ed.), Meat Culture (pp. 1–30). Brill Books.
   Google Scholar
• Probyn-Rapsey, F. (2018). The “crazy cat lady. In L. Gruen & F. Probyn-Rapsey (Eds.), Animaladies (pp. 175–186). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. S. (2019). Finding healing through animal companionship in Japanese animal cafés. Medical Humanities, 45(2), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2018-011635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweik, S. M. (2009). The Ugly laws. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M. (2020). Critical disability studies: Rethinking the conventions for the age of postmodernity. In N. Watson & S. Vehmas (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability studies (2nd) ed., pp. 32–44). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (2001). Writings on an ethical life. Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (2015). Animal liberation (4th) ed.). The Bodley Head.
   Google Scholar
• Socha, K. A., Bentley, J. K. C., & Schatz, J. L. (2014). Eco-Ability the intersection of Earth, animal, and disability. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 12(2), 1–180. https://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/JCAS-Vol-12-Issue-2-May-20145.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Somers, K., & Soldatic, K. (2020). Productive bodies: How neoliberalism makes and unmakes disability in non-human animals. In S. Jenkins, K. Struthers Monford, & C. Taylor (Eds.), Animality and disability: Crip perspectives in critical animal studies (pp. 35–56). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, K. (2013). The biopolitics of animal being and welfare: Dog control and care in the UK and India. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(1), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00501.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2017). Beasts of Burden: Animal and disability liberation. The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, N., & Twine, R. (2014). Locating the “critical” in critical animal studies. In N. Taylor & R. Twine (Eds.), The rise of critical animal studieS (pp. 1–15). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Urbanik, J. (2012). Placing animals: An introduction to the geography of human-animal relations. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. (2015). Animal geographies, anarchist praxis, and critical animal studies. In K. Gillespie & R. C. Collard (Eds.), Critical animal geographies (pp. 19–35). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• White, L. (2021). ‘I have to know where I can go’: Mundane mobilities and everyday public toilet access for people living with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Social and Cultural Geography, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2021.1975165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R. (2021). Advancing trans-species social and spatial justice through critical animal geographies. In A. J. Hovorka, S. McCubbin, & L. van Patter (Eds.), A research agenda for animal geographies (pp. 183–198). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Wolch, J., & Emel, J. (1998). Animal geographies. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Wolch, J., & Philo, C. (2000). From distributions of deviance to definitions of difference: Past and future mental health geographies. Health and Place, 6(3), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-8292(00)00019-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar