Everything All Right at the Internal EU Borders? The Ambivalent Effects of Cross-Border Integration and the Rise of Euroscepticism

References

• Agape (Agence d’urbanisme Nord Lorraine). 2009. Développement du Grand-duché du Luxembourg – Impacts et enjeux sur le nord-lorrain. Agape report. Longwy, France: Agape.
   Google Scholar
• Aussilloux, V., and B. Le Hir. 2016. The economic cost of rolling back schengen. France Strategie Report. Paris, France: France Strategie.
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J. 2004. From ‘spaces of place’ to ‘spaces of flows’? Territorial and functional governance in cross-border regions in Europe and North America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28/3:530–548, 545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. 1999. Towards convergence in Europe? Institutional adaptation to Europeanisation in Germany and Spain. Journal of Common Market Studies 39 (4):573–96.
   Google Scholar
• Bouillaud, C., and E. Reungoat. 2014. Tous des opposants? De l’euroscepticisme aux usages de la critique de l’Europe. Politique Européenne 43 (1):9–45.
   Google Scholar
• Brack, N., and N. Startin. 2015. Introduction: Euroscepticism, from the margins to the mainstream. International Political Science Review 36 (3):239–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunet-Jailly, E. 2005. Theorising borders: An interdisciplinary perspective. Geopolitics 10 (4):633–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bürkner, H.-J. 2015. Beyond constructivism: Europeanisation and bordering under the impact of power and imaginaries. In Borderscaping: Imaginations and practices of border making, ed. C. Brambilla, J. Laine, and J. Scott, 27–40. Oxon, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, S., and P. Gerber. 2009. De la mobilité résidentielle à la construction des espaces de la vie quotidienne. Recherche Transports Sécurité 25 (102):61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, S., and P. Gerber. 2010. Quelles conséquences de la mobilité résidentielle transfrontalière sur les déplacements quotidiens et les espaces de vie? In Mobilité résidentielle transfrontalière entre le Luxembourg et ses régions voisines, ed. S. Carpentier, 85–109. Forum Europa 6, Luxembourg: Editions Saint Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Chilla, T., E. Evrard, and C. Schultz. 2012. On the territoriality of cross-border cooperation: ‘Institutional mapping’ in a multi-level context. European Planning Studies 20 (6):961–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC). 2008. Green paper on territorial cohesion turning territorial diversity into strength. Stockholm, Sweden: Nordregio. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/consultation/terco/paper_terco_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• De Boe, P., C. Grasland, and A. Healy. 1999. Spatial integration: Study programme on European spatial planning. Final report 1.4. Stockholm, Sweden: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• De Voogd, J. 2014. Redrawing Europe’s map. World Policy Journal 31 (4):21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., and F. Durand. 2016. Building a cross-border territorial strategy between four countries: Wishful thinking? European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1195796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., and F. Durand. 2017. Challenges and obstacles in the production of cross-border territorial strategies: The example of the greater region. Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning 1 (1):65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., F. Durand, and V. Feltgen. 2015. Opportunities of cross-border cooperation between small and medium cities in Europe. Report realised on behalf of the Department for Spatial planning. Ministry for sustainable development and Infrastructures in Luxembourg in the frame of the Luxembourg, Italian and Latvian EU Trio Presidency. 55. Luxembourg: Department of Spatial Planning and Development - Ministry of Sustainable Development and Infrastructure.
   Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., F. Durand, C. Sohn, and O. Walther. 2013. Comparing cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe: Towards a functional typology. Journal of Borderlands Studies 28 (2):221–37.
   Google Scholar
• Díez Medrano, J. 2003. Framing Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diop, L. 2011. Métropolisation transfrontalière et spécialisation sociale à Luxembourg – La concentration spatiale des actifs métropolitains supérieurs. L’Espace Géographique 40 (4):289–304.
   Google Scholar
• Diop, L. 2013. La production de l’espace résidentiel dans l’aire métropolitaine transfrontalière de Luxembourg. PhD thesis, Université Paris X Nanterre, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F. 2014. Challenges of cross-border spatial planning in the metropolitan regions of Luxembourg and Lille. Planning Practice & Research 29 (2):113–32.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F. 2015. Theoretical framework of the cross-border space production - the case of the Eurometropolis Lille-Kortrijk–Tournai. Journal of Borderlands Studies 30 (3):309–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dürrschmidt, J. 2006. So near yet so far: Blocked networks, global links and multiple exclusion in the German-Polish borderlands. Global Networks 6 (3):245–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESPON. 2014. ESPON Atlas - Mapping European territorial structures and dynamics. Luxembourg: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. Cross-border cooperation in the EU. Flash Eurobarometer 422 Aggregate report. http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/ResultDoc/download/DocumentKy/67980.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, DG Employment and Social Affaires, ed. 2009. Scientific report on the mobility of cross-border workers within the EU-27/EEA/EFTA Countries. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gabel, M. 1998. Interests and integration. Market liberalisation, public opinion, and European Union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gualini, E. 2003. Cross-border governance: Inventing regions in a trans-national multi-level polity. disP - the Planning Review 152:43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, L., and C. Sohn. 2014. The cross-border metropolis in a global age: A conceptual model and empirical evidence from the US–Mexico and European border regions. Global Society 28 (4):441–61.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, L., and C. Sohn. 2017. The co-mingling of bordering dynamics in the San Diego–Tijuana cross-border metropolis. Territory, Politics, Governance. doi:10.1080/21622671.2017.1323003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 1997. The making of a polity: The struggle over European integration. European Integration Online Papers 1 (4):1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2009. A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining. British Journal of Political Science 39 (1):1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. 2003. European integration and new forms of uneven development: But not the end of territorially distinctive capitalisms in Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies 10/1:49–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBA. 2012. Die Arbeitsmarksituation in der Grossregion, 8. Bericht der Interregionalen Arbeitsmarktbeobachtungsstelle an den 13. Gipfel der Exekutive der Großregion. www.iba-oie.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Berichte/DE_IBA-Bericht_No8.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• INSEE. 2014. Rhône-Alpes‘Haute-Savoie: Un des départements les plus dynamiques de France. INSEE report. http://www.insee.fr/fr/insee_regions/rhone-alpes/themes/syntheses/lettre_analyses/02220/02220_lettre_RP_Haute_Savoie.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• INSEE Lorraine. 2011. Nord Lorrain: Rebond démographique tiré par la dynamique luxembourgeoise. Economie-Lorraine, INSEE Report 257.
   Google Scholar
• Knippschild, R. 2011. Cross-border spatial planning: Understanding, designing and managing cooperation processes in the German-Polish-Czech Borderland. European Planning Studies 19 (4):629–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knippschild, R., and A. Schmotz. 2016. Border regions as disturbed functional areas: Analyses on cross-border interrelations and quality of life along the German-Polish border. Journal of Borderland Studies. doi:10.1080/08865655.2016.1195703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolossov, V., A.-L. Amilhat, I. Liikanen, D. Newman, P. Joenniemi, N. Yuval-Davis, S. Rosière, and J. Scott. 2012. EUBORDERSCAPES: State of the debate. Report 1 EUBORDERSCAPES FP7 Project. http://www.euborderscapes.eu/index.php?id=project_reports.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, V. 2015. Toward a theory of borders in motion. Journal of Borderland Studies 30 (1):1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramsch, O., and B. Hooper, eds. 2004. Cross-border governance in the European Union. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krastev, I. 2012. European disintegration? Journal of Democracy 23 (4):23–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krätke, S. 1999. Regional integration or fragmentation? The German-polish border region in a New Europe. Regional Studies 33 (7):631–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 2011. Europa ante portas: Border residence, transnational interaction and Euroscepticism in Germany and France. European Union Politics 13 (1):94–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, J. 2016. The multiscalar production of borders. Geopolitics 21 (3):465–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Monde. La France rétablit les contrôles aux frontières, une décision rendue possible par les règles de Schengen. http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2015/11/14/la-france-va-fermer-ses-frontieres-une-possibilite-exceptionnelle-rendue-possible-par-les-regles-de-schengen_4809529_3224.html.
   Google Scholar
• Leconte, C. 2015. From pathology to mainstream phenomenon: Reviewing the Euroscepticism debate in research and theory. International Political Science Review 36 (3):250–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibenath, M., E. Korcelli-Olejniczak, and R. Knippschild, eds. 2008. Cross-border governance and sustainable spatial development. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lundquist, K.-J., and M. Trippl. 2013. Distance, proximity and types of cross-border innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. Regional Studies 47 (3):450–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, C. W. 2005. The Öresund Area: Pre- and post-bridge cross-border functional integration: The bi-national regional question. Geojournal 61 (1) (2004):31–39.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, L. 2006. Identity, interests, and attitudes to european integration. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Meijers, M. 2015. Contagious euroscepticism? The impact of the eurosceptic challenger support on mainstream party positions on European integration. Party Politics. doi:10.1177/1354068815601787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mission Opérationelle Transfrontalière (MOT). 2004. Atlas de la cooperation transfrontalière. Dynamiques transfrontalières et projets de territoire. Paris, France: MOT.
   Google Scholar
• Morehouse, B. J. 2004. Theoretical approaches to border-spaces and identities. In Challenged borderlands: Transcending political and cultural boundaries, ed. V. Pavlakovich-Kochi, B. J. Morehouse, and D. Wastl-Walter, 19–41. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• MOT (Mission Opérationnelle Transfrontalière). 2006. Problématiques foncières et immobilières dans les agglomérations transfrontalières de Genève et de Bâle. Report commissioned by Direction Générale Urbanisme, Habitat et Construction du Ministère des Transports, de l’Equipement, du Tourisme et de la Mer. Paris, France: Ministére des Transports de l’Équipement du Tourisme et de la Mer.
   Google Scholar
• Nelles, J., and F. Durand. 2014. Political rescaling and metropolitan governance in cross-border regions: Comparing the cross-border metropolitan areas of Lille and Luxembourg. European Urban Regional Studies 21 (1):104–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, J. P. 2002. The many faces of Europeanisation. Journal of Common Market Studies 5:921–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. 1999. Building governance institutions across European borders. Regional Studies 33 (7):657–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. 2007. Construction of new territorial scales: A framework and case study of EUREGIO cross-border region. Regional Studies 41:253–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. 2003. The Europeanisation of public policy. In The politics of europeanisation, ed. K. Featherstone and C. Radaelli, 30. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ratti, R., and S. Reichman, eds. 1993. Theory and practice of transborder cooperation. Basel, Switzerland: Verlag Helbing & Lichtenhahn.
   Google Scholar
• Reitel, B. 2013. Border temporality and space integration in the European transborder agglomeration of Basel. Journal of Borderlands Studies 28 (2):239–56.
   Google Scholar
• Rumford, C. 2012. Towards a multiperspectival study of borders. Geopolitics 17 (4):887–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saurruger, S. 2014. Europeanisation in times of crisis. Political Studies Review 12:181–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidberger, M. 1997. Regionen und europäische Legitimität. Der Einfluss des regionalen Umfeldes auf Bevölkerungseinstellungen zur EU. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, C. 2014a. Modelling cross-border integration: The role of borders as a resource. Geopolitics 19 (3):587–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, C. 2014b. The border as a resource in the Global Urban Space: A contribution to the cross-border metropolis hypothesis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (5):1697–1711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, C., B. Reitel, and O. Walther. 2009. Cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe: The case of Luxembourg, Basel and Geneva. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27 (5):922–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spierings, B., and M. Van Der Velde. 2013. Cross-border differences and unfamiliarity: Shopping mobility in the Dutch-German Rhine-Waal Euroregion. European Planning Studies 21 (1):5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiss Confederation. 2016. Les accords bilatéraux Suisse–Union europénne. Bern, Switzerland:Departement fédéral des Affaires Etrangéres.
   Google Scholar
• Terlouw, K. 2012. Border surfers and Euroregions: Unplanned cross-border behaviour and planned territorial structures of cross-border governance. Planning Practice and Research 27 (3):351–66.
   Google Scholar
• Topaloglou, L., D. Kalliora, P. Manetos, and G. Petrakos. 2005. A border regions typology in the enlarged European Union. Journal of Borderlands Studies 20 (2):67–89.
   Google Scholar
• Trenz, H.-J., and P. De Wilde. 2009. Denouncing European integration: Euroscepticism as reactive identity formation. RECON Working Paper Series 10 (2009):1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Usherwood, S., and N. Startin. 2013. Euroscepticism as a persistent phenomenon. Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahl, M., and N. Grolimund. 2006. Integration without membership - Switzerland’s bilateral agreements with the European Union. Brussels, Belgium: CEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Velde, M., and T. Van Naerssen, eds. 2015. Mobility and migration choices: Thresholds to crossing borders. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Van Houtum, H. 2000. An overview of European geographical research on borders and border regions. Journal of Borderlands Studies 15 (1):57–83.
   Google Scholar
• Vintilǎ, G., M. Onofrei, and I. Ţibulcǎ. 2014. Fiscal convergence in an enlarged European union. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 41:213–23.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, O., and B. Reitel. 2013. Cross-border policy networks in the Basel region: The effect of national borders and brokerage roles. Space & Polity 17 (2):217–36.
   Google Scholar
• Wassenberg, B., and B. Reitel. 2015. Territorial cooperation in Europe. A historical perspective. Luxembourg: European Commission – Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Zhurzhenko, T. 2011. Borders and memory. In The research companion to border studies, ed. D. Wastl-Walter, 63–84. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar